A shocking lack of discussion...


As seems to be the case with the films of Douglas Buck, I was turned onto "Family Portraits" by my friend, Scott. Since he currently works at a video store that tends to lean away from the mainstream as much as possible, he always ends up finding obscure little gems that have slipped far below my own radar.

Mind you, this is NOT an easy film to sit through. All three of these tales are dark, haunting stories about people in traditional "happy" families that are driven to do horrifying things. Occasionally, the violence - emotional and physical - is motivated by spousal abuse, sexual molestation and other terrible things, but what's even more disturbing is when these unspeakable acts are motivated by something as mundane as attempting to break up the monotony of everyday suburban life.

Sure, it's a tough pill to swallow, but "Family Portraits" is a film that demands to be endured. It is a REAL horror movie. This isn't an easily digestible slasher-of-the-week that will escape you as soon as it's over.

Some people may wonder why anyone would want to subject themselves to a film like this. I firmly believe that a film like this is necessary to show people who may have been desensitized by the evening news that the victims of these crimes are real people with real stories, real families and real consequences.

I apologize if I'm coming off as preachy, but based on the customer reviews I read on Netflix and Amazon.com, it seems to me that some people are turning this DVD off during the first film, "Cutting Moments." This is a huge mistake. They might be expecting more blood and gore - granted, "Cutting Moments" has moments that are worthy of Takashi Miike - but the majority of the horror that remains to be seen is of a psychological nature.

Track this one down, see it... and try not to cover your eyes.

reply

I watched all three, though i have to admit that 'cutting moments' was my favorite. The last one (Prologue) was very slow, but a great story nonetheless, and probably the creepiest of the 3 stories.

"First you wanna kill me, now you want "kiss me. Blo(e)w" I Did(aka eBathory)

reply

Cutting Moments is my favorite too. It's probably my favorite horror short of all time, next to Kitchen Sink.

Prologue is good to, though it really reminds me of The Sweet Hereafter. The lead actress even looks like Sarah Polley.

"It Rub's The Lotion On It's Skin Or Else It Get's The Ho(r)se Again"I Can (aka ThrownMuse)

reply

Crap, I thought that WAS Sarah Polley!

I'll have to check out The Sweet Hereafter, even if you just potentially spoiled the plot twist for me. Is Ian Holmes a child molesting killer?

"First you wanna kill me, now you want "kiss me. Blo(e)w" I Did(aka eBathory)

reply

No, I didn't really spoil anything except that sarah polley is in a wheelchair.
sorry

but PLEASE check it out, it's one of my all time favorite films. SO SO SO unbelievably good. it's the first movie i saw on the big screen when i moved to town, so i have a special place in my heart for it :)

also, check out the movie CRUSH by Alison maclean. it's on netflix. it isn't horror, but i think you'd really like it. it's kinda a neo-noir i guess, with marcia gay harden as the femme fatale. she's awesome in it. it's from new zealand!!!! anyways, the short Kitchen Sink is on there, which you will also love.




"It Rub's The Lotion On It's Skin Or Else It Get's The Ho(r)se Again"I Can (aka ThrownMuse)

reply



"First you wanna kill me, now you want "kiss me. Blo(e)w" I Did(aka eBathory)

reply

"Prologue" is my favorite. It's subtle and haunting and well acted. Actually I believe if "Family Portraits" hadn't had such a gory first segment (which I liked, but I'm sure turns many people off to the point they stop watching) I think it's just the kind of flick Ebert and Roeper would give a thumbs up to! Interesting filmmaking.

reply


Agreed. Very subtle, haunting and moving. Definitely the best of the three, although 'Cutting Moments' is also very powerful and raw (in more ways than one)

reply

[deleted]

is this as disturbing, less disturbing, or more disturbing than takashi miike?

reply

--Miike's works(for me at least) are pretty intense at times, but quite silly, over all, and teach us to appreciate raw humanity. As far as the content, Miike visually goes above and beyond dramatic. Buck's trilogy here is modern rabid humanity. There is no excitement or fun to be had, only sad affirmations of us, the first arrogant race on the planet.

--I knew they would be entertaining, but what shocked me was that it was available to rent on a shelf in a major video store chain in the middle of the BIBLE BELT. I'm used to having to spend twice as much to buy specific cult interest dvds for 3 times their actual worth at Border's.

Cutting Moments:
--Hauntingly slow, but definitely paced appropriately. I asked my ex what she thought of it, and she sat in silence for most of an hour and then vomited. She thought I should be imprisoned for watching that. Needless to say, she was much too sensitive for the subject matter, and we're no longer together partly as a result.

Home:
--If you'll pardon the pun, this one hit particularly close to home. East Tennessee(knoxville) is riddled with families that sit in silence. Quiet, submissive mothers who never really speak up, or develop personalities. Children harboring what is deemed way too many questions-until church and school and peers silence them while they are weak. And fathers, who hide under their own father's shadow of being the ideal man. This story saddened me, because it's what most children dream of their parents when they hate them so.

Prologue:
--Continuing the theme of realism, and the itch in the back of your head that you heard this story on the news or read it in the newspaper. But this is the story after the news on it has run its course. Non-violent-but it this one, the viewer is actually hoping the killer is merciless. The protagonist has motive and the antagonist, for lack of a better term, has it coming. When I realized how I felt while watching it, I realized that I am no better than any other human.

--And that's how I like movies to be. Reminding of what we all have the potential to do. I highly suggest this trilogy for anyone willing to turn back on their emotions, instead of turning them off and taking a roller coaster ride-as you would a Miike film.

reply

I totally didn't understand the last of the three stories in this. Did the old man kill his daughter and rape and mutilate the lead actress girl? If so, and the lead girl knows, why wasn't he at least put in prison for this? She is going to just let him go? I'm sorry, but I don't think showing up at his place and showing him your lack of hands is punishment enough. It didn't ring true and it was a major turning point for me in this series. I didn't finish watching the movie, I fast-forwarded to see if there was any eventual confrontation, but instead he just digs a hole in his backyard. I know I fast-forwarded through some plot points, so if anyone can fill me in, or explain, I would appreciate it.

reply

Yes, you are correct on your interpretation of the events. However, I don't think reality is what Buck was going for. I think the point is more that he is being punished already. He feels guilt and self hate, he is torn and tormented by his own darkness (yes, I know that sounds cliché); his going to jail won't do anything to achieve "justice" (whatever that means) and she gets some of her life back, a sense of of security if you will, by seeing what a small and pathetic man he is. He isn't the powerful demon anymore. At least that's what I got.

And really, did this segment ring any less true than "Cutting Moments"?

reply

K Sear, I'm going to be honest with you. I didn't really like any of these stories, I didn't like the work as a whole, but I will not say that they didn't ring true entirely becuause that would be foolish of me. I think we see a lot of crazy junk these days that is very similar in tone to some of the "crimes" committed in this film. I just think it was almost anti-climactic and not showing the old man before when the crime was committed left me unsure about the story. I know these are shorts and some portions need to be insinuated but without that story chunk, it lost some of its impact.

reply

Well, considering Miike doesn't really have any disturbing movies...

reply

People often think that when they only focus on the overt surface of his work. When certain pieces are allowed to sink in further, a number of them turn out to have a very disturbing core.

reply

I kinda agree on this. Miike is more tongue in cheek (ichi the killer)and more trippy (gozu).

I just rented this tonight and have yet to watch it.

Dare I say that I enjoy movies like Irriversible, I Stand Alone, etc...

Hardly ever do films actually press on feelings, leaving you mentally raped. I love horror films but REAL horror is the world around us.

reply

Of course works like "Ichi the Killer", "Full Metal Yakuza", "Happiness of the Katakuris" and the like are meant to be tongue in cheek or full out funny. Other works like "Audition", "Visitor Q" and even "Dead or Alive" have layers to them that go deeper than that, at least if you choose to interpret them that way.

reply


As disturbing!

reply