Worst of the Worst


I had never heard about this movie until about 2 weeks ago. With a name like "The Worst Horror Movie Ever" it got my interest. Upon seeing it I made the conclusion about 10 minutes into the film that this was just horid. Horid in a good way. This movie was so bad and yet you can't get enough of it. The gore moments are as fake as it gets (watermelon heads, smily face bag heads, aluminum foil axes, etc.) the acting is over the top and there is absolutly no story. This all makes for an interesting film, if you can make it all the way through. Anyone else like this film?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I liked it too. I thought it was just 'awfully' funny in that in parts of the movie you sat there feeling like you were laughing guilty. Because you found such humor in such a horrid movie. It wasn't all together the worst move ever made!

reply

(laughs) I suppose you are right. I suppose when you intentionally make a movie this horrible that it really can't be the worst movie ever. I suppose that is reserved for films that were suppose to be good but turned out horrible.

reply

Read this review...I must see this film! Haha

http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror_reviews_5938.htm

And you can blame it on me, just set your guilt free honey, I don't want to hold you back now love.

reply

We found it hilarious as well. Once you get over the fact it's SUPPOSED to look bad, and have every monster ever within one movie, it gets pretty funny. I could how people wouldn't like it though, once your used to the slick look of film and effects, this looks terrible. But c'mon, just consider it a comedy/horror, much like the ones you probably made as a kid, and it's actually a pretty funny flick in that regard...

"Look, it's not that i'm lazy, it's that I just don't care..." - Peter Gibbons

reply

I'm not sure if it's SUPPOSED to look bad, or if it really has no choice in the matter.

reply