MovieChat Forums > Secret Smile (2005) Discussion > If Brendon was played by a different act...

If Brendon was played by a different actor... *SPOILERS*


I know this board has been dead for a few months but I've just finished watching Part 2 (watched Pt 1 almost a year ago and never got round to finishing it ) but I have to say one of the things that intrigues me the most about this movie is the opinions of those who have seen it - especially females.

Now, to me, I know Tennant from things like Doctor Who and Casanova, where his character is often a lovable, slightly eccentric, occasionally morally ambiguous joker who, most of the time, you just wanna hang out with and occasionally slap on the back of the head. That said, his portrayal in this as a charming but obviously bordering-on-psychopathic obsessive stalker was absolutely fantastic. Honestly. One of the best performances of his that I've seen (and yes, I am a fan).

However, one thing that slightly concerns me is the reaction by some females to his character. It seems to me that people have a habit of mixing actors with their characters - using an actor's reputation as a 'nice guy' combined with previous parts they've played to try and excuse a despicable character's actions. To me, although I like Tennant, Brendan is someone I would cross the street to avoid. It seemed fairly obvious to me that he was somehow responsible for the death of Miranda's brother and the later murders. Hell, this character was undeniably a rapist! He was not a nice guy! However, because of the actor playing him, many seem to look for any excuse to dismiss this.

So. I have a question. If Brendan wasn't played by Tennant - let's say he was played by some random, generally unknown actor with Tennant's talent - would anyone still try and make excuses for his actions/dismiss them? Or would the general consensus now be that Brendan is as appalling as is evident in the film? In other words, does the casting affect how people see characters?

PS Yes, I am aware that this was made before Tennant became Doctor Who but it doesn't take away from the fact that this is a guy who is generally known for being 'light and fluffy' with his choices of roles - the exceptions (as far as I know) being this and Hamlet/Richard II.


Someday I'm gonna make a movie then laugh watching people over-analyse it

reply

Dominic West might have been a good Brendan.

But the key thing about casting Tennant (to me anyway) was that he has a basic boyish charm to his appearance. To look at him, people would get a first impression that he's a floppish puppy dog kind of guy. The "darkness within" doesn't appear on the outside, because his physical appearance is very benign and jolly.

It's the inside/outside disconnect that makes Brendan so dangerous.

But if you cast an edgier actor like Dominic West or James Purefoy, their appearance is more mature and edgy looking as a basic "look."

So Tennant was especially great for this role.

reply

You know what this may sound VERY creepy but I LOVE seeing actors (mostly the ones I have crushes on like David Tennant, Hugh Jackman, Zachary Quinto and many others) be VERY BAD. I mean if some of the characters these actors play we're real they would be sentenced to a life on prison or death for their crimes. But to me, there is nothing more sexy than a man like David playing the obsessive, abusive, angry, violent man. I think if a guy can pull that off and do it so fantastically, like David, then he has reached into his soul and found a whole new side of himself. He has proven himself as an incredible actor. So many actors have done that and the process has even gone so far as to take the life of one of the greatest young actors ever
(RIP Heath Ledger). And as for David, he did this part in Secret Smile before he became the doctor and I fell in love with him. Now, I only love him more!!! He truly is AMAZING!!!

reply