MovieChat Forums > Outlander (2008) Discussion > F-word does not belong in this film...

F-word does not belong in this film...


The use of the F-word in the film is incorrect. The word was not in exsistence in 709 AD. If you are thinking that Kainan knew it from the where he was from in his language...I doubt that it would have come out as the F-word in English since the word did not exsist then. Plus it was also used by Boromir in a scene that was deleted from the film.

reply

That WAS silly and unnecessary. I rolled my eyes when he said it. Took me right out of the movie. I don't expect a whole lot of accuracy from this sort of movie, but that was just ridiculous. It becomes downright puzzling, if you take into account that they actually bothered to make the language Kainan speaks authentic Old Norse. What the *beep*? Why? You put in all that effort, and then you ruin it with a self-indulgent, completely pointless "*beep*"? What kind of reasoning is that?


Reminds me of some of those completely ridiculous moments in the LotR movies, like Legolas skating down a flight of stairs on a shield or whatever it was. I strongly suspect these decisions get made when the entire crew is completely exhausted and fed up with everything, and everyboy just wants to wrap and go home. How these things make it past the final edit, though, that's a mystery.

reply

I agree with some of the OTHER POSTERS on this. Since we are just HEARING English (he is really speaking old norse) I just assumed he was cursing an appropriate profanity of the time. It didn't have to mean exactly our MODERN cursing, but had to convey the same Sentiment. That's all.

Didn't bother me at all. I was always keenly aware what WE were hearing and what they were saying were vastly different, just for the sake of OUR viewing experience.

Dr. Kila Marr was right. Kill the Crystalline Entity.

reply

I don't really have a problem with it at all. He was speaking Norse, not modern English. So he didn't actually say the F-word, he said some Norse equivalent. I find it perfectly reasonable to assume there was some old Norse vulgarity used as an expression of exasperation, and that's what he was really saying.

I'm not sure exactly when this movie supposedly takes place, but it's possible nothing resembling modern English existed at all back then. Old English (think Beowulf) and Middle English (think Chaucer) are different enough that a modern English speaker would have to study them like any other foreign language before they could understand them. Early Modern English (think Shakespeare and King James) is the oldest variant that most modern English speakers can parse without training, and even that can be an uphill slog.

So modern English was used in Outlander for the benefit of the audience, and the F-word was a stand-in for some Norse vulgarity. I see no more problem with that than with any other use of modern English in the movie.

reply

You make a good point, but I maintain that even if it can be reasoned out in the way you just did, in the viewing of the movie it's still jarring. It clashes with the tone. This is my instinctive reaction, before I stop to consider why it might be justifiable. I believe that probably many other people would have a similar gut reaction.


There's no reason, after all, why Legolas wouldn't have independently invented skating down stairs on a board-like object, but that isn't my first thought.

reply

There's no reason, after all, why Legolas wouldn't have independently invented skating down stairs on a board-like object, but that isn't my first thought.


I had a lot of thoughts like that when first exposed to fantasy as my inclination was that stories like this were meant to be set in a "mythological made real" past, but it goes away once you get to understand the set up behind these concepts (the same goes for the whole language thing which is pretty common in fiction like this) - A lot of fantasy stories are not set on Earth, but on completely different worlds and their development is separate from that of our own as a result of added factors; namely, the mythological and fictional creatures that are tossed into the mix... such as elves. When you have entirely new species running around that have different levels of intelligence, different physical capabilities, different cultural drives, and (yes) different magical attributes then "realistically" ideas and such will pop up at a different rate.

With our own history, you could take out a handful of people and add in a handful of others and the development of ideas would have gone completely differently. There were people like Copernicus, Galileo, Einstein, etc., who were ahead of their time and if not for them then someone may not have unlocked the knowledge they contributed to us for who knows how much longer. Likewise, who knows what knowledge we "lost" because people died young or because people were pushed in different directions by parents/society. Small changes in the lives of a few individuals could have led us living in who know what kind of civilization right now.

So if we imagine a world where there are entire civilizations of curious gnomes and wise old elves, the logical conclusion would be that this would have a significant impact and cause things to go differently than it did for us. The problem people seem to get caught up on is the whole medieval aspect. But, basically, the idea tends to be that either it's an example of a parallel civilization or medieval humans somehow found their way to this magical world (I'm not much of a Tolkien fan so I could be off, but I think the concept is that everything takes place on lost continents that European humans reached by boat). They are then kept in that state for thousands of years because magic acts as a replacement for technological development. You do have highly intelligent curious species like gnomes who like to tinker with ideas and create things like hot air balloons (this is commented on a lot by people who don't know fantasy that well and don't expect to see such a development in a medieval setting) and gear based devices, but many of the inhabitants depend on magic to cure diseases, help them fight wars, and make their lives easier in various other ways. Therefore, the drive to fix these problems through natural development is not the same as it was for us. Further, you tend to have the people who wield this magic in positions of power and the last thing they want to do is lose that and so they can sometimes stifle developments that they see as a threat.

reply

Mel Gibson used it Apocalypto, and that movie had zero aliens or dragons.

And you know what, I read that at that time in their language they had words similar to the F word even back then, of course it wasn't the F word, but it was something similar

reply

Oh yeah. I'm sure Vikings were dainty fellows who only spoke a proper literary language without cursing ever.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

Maybe the F word was used on Kainan's home planet. Besides, if you had to learn a foreign language the way he did, you'd be cursing too.

Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!

reply