Ending (spoilers)


The general consensus is that two of the most tragic/moving scenes in the film are - 1) Damien's shooting and 2) Chris Reilly's shooting.

I'm sure some of you have already picked up on what I am about to explain below, however, since I've found no mention of it on the board, I've resolved to write this post in hope of reading your opinions and/or interpretations of the following.

While walking with Sinead through the forest, Damien discloses what transpired between him and Chris Reilly's mother. He explains, "And I showed her the grave and I'd put a cross and some flowers on it. And she turned to me and she said, 'I never want to see your face again'.
Damien then said, 'I've crossed the line now, Sinead'.

In hindsight, I find this interesting. Following Damien's execution, Teddy visits Sinead as the indirect bearer of ill tidings and the bearer of Damien's final letter and necklace. Although he doesn't explicitly mention what had happened, Sinead intuits that Damien is dead. In her grief and heartache, she cries out, 'I don't ever want to see you again'.
This was the last line of dialogue in the film.

Damien personally acknowledges that he has crossed a line, thereby intimating he has wronged Chris, Chris' mother and his own former principles. Although Teddy does not verbally admit his wrongdoing, the viewer vicariously feels his pain and guilt, which is evident in his tears and facial expressions. I believe, that, in the wake of his brother's death, and with further time to reflect on what misfortune he ultimately allowed unfold, he only truly realises he has overstepped the threshold of morality when Sinead utters that line. Similarly, I don't think Damien truly grasped the full extent of his actions until Chris'’ mother told him, coolly and sombrely, to disappear from her sight and more importantly, her life.

I feel, that, as both lines are said to the two characters (or perhaps even in the moments that follow Chris and Damien’'s shootings), both lives are irrevocably transformed, irrespective of which direction their lives would take from that point onward. They had both prioritised nationalistic needs and loyalties over family and friends, they both had blood on their hands and they had both reached the point of no return.

Teddy'’s fate is not explored but one could infer that, he, too, would meet an untimely end, or live with the remorse to the end of his days. I find everything to be incredibly devastating..the failed realisation of Damien'’s previous dreams, the deaths, the ending, what happened in between, the lives forever altered, the many souls sacrificed to the elusive quest for independence and freedom.

I must confess my ignorance of Ireland'’s history prior to watching this film. The Wind That Shakes The Barley has inspired me to engage in self-research and try to understand the grimy, harrowing details.

Naturally, I accept that you may or may not entertain my views on the parallels drawn in these particular scenes. Be that as it may, I am curious to hear your thoughts about what I've written above, and for that matter, the aftertaste your first viewing of TWTSTB left you with.

reply

I think your post is excellent. I can't reply now but I respomded as a type of 'bump'. Will reply soon.

Your's sincerely, General Joseph Liebgott

reply

babii-g1^


"They had both prioritised nationalistic needs and loyalties over family and friends, they both had blood on their hands and they had both reached the point of no return."


Interesting comment.

Almost an inherent dilemma -- one would think that the actions taken and sacrifices made would revolve around the needs of 'family and friends', but then when placed opposite (?) the 'nationalistic needs and loyalties' you speak of, one wonders if one could always act in a way that would preserve both when going down the various paths these characters did, or would one be (as depicted in this film) forced at some point to choose one over the other, with the ramifications of either choice resulting in some terrible outcome, either way?

I found many 'divides' and 'conflicts' of various natures explored in this film.

I thought this was a very good film and want to see it again.

I, like you, also would like to do some more research about these times in Irish history.


Thanks for your wonderful comments!


"I can't stand a naked light bulb, any more than..a rude remark or a vulgar action" Blanche DuBois

reply

What else can close love ones say under those terrible circumstances ?

Agree with you the movie and its story, to use your own words, "incredibly devastating", as all wars for independence, against colonialism or imperialism or whatever isms that follows the credo of "might is right", had been, and still is, in some parts of this world today.

I'm Asian and my country's past history is wrought with revolutions against invaders -Spanish, American, Japanese - so we also had sectors of our freedom fighters during those long ago years accepting compromises with the enemies, even collaborating with them, also had to deal with betrayals, disappointments with the members of the church (especially during the Spanish period when the Catholic Church is exclusive for Spaniards). We've regained our freedom mid 40's. Then as now, we had a predominantly Catholic faith, and there are times even today when our clergy comes under fire for their tendency to forget their vows of poverty and chastity, seeing how they would often grace high society functions of the perfumed crowd.

That being the case, I empathize greatly with what the Irish went through before they became a Free State.

I remember about fifteen years ago, I read a novel by Leon Uris - Trinity - about a fictional three families that figured in the history of Ireland (but I wonder, then and even now, maybe Uris has just changed the names and made some modifications in the characters?). The historical background is quite accurate, since I remember researching for facts about the country after reading the book - (not from Wikipedia). When I first read that book, it took me a long time to finish it because there is so much about it that is quite similar with my own country's history, and I had to put it down from time to time. It took me five years later to be able to read it again. Leon Uris said in his book "It was on Easter Monday of 1916 that a terrible beauty was born by a declaration of independence." That Ireland has a "terrible beauty" in its struggles I can quite truly agree with.




Truth inexorably,inscrutably seeks and reveals Itself into the Light.

reply

To Torian06 and everybody else, I guess I'm not really replying, but I just wanted to say that your posts are great. I completely understand where Torian06 is coming from, I'm not Irish or Asian but my countrymen too have fought off invaders, and then plunged into civil war, twice in our most recent history. Brother against brother, ex freedom fighters turned into collaborators, compromises, we too have seen all that. That's one of the reasons this film moved me. I'll look up the book you mentioned Torian06. Thanks for the posts everyody.

reply

There must be some mistake, an intelligent and perceptive thread on IMDB. Thank you all for your posts.

Apart from the interpretation you make, which is undoubtedly intended for max dramatic effect, I wonder is Laverty/Loach [L/L] trying to make a contrast between how easy it is to kill people you don't know v how difficult it is when you know them?

Humans have a long way to evolve before we will deserve much respect, as highlighted by that contrast. When a few months bootcamp can turn probably normal people into killers, we haven't advanced too far out of the jungle. It's a point made by many war films, and this one is really much the same, just different location.

It's a raw movie, very well done, but the themes are universal I guess. Ancient Greek theater is full of this kind of family and circle killing, as is Shakespeare et al. The dramatic ploy of getting the audience to ask "Could I kill my [insert relative/friend]?" has a much stronger effect than "Could I kill a guy from another county/country?".

L/L may also be saying that many of us are unaware of the true consequences of our actions until the cold slap of a wet fish appears--such as a broken woman telling you to never appear before her again. Or a different twist, re how easy it is for good people to delude themselves into doing the most evil things, realisation only dawning with wet fish. Of course, many never get wet fished, and are free to bask in perpetual delusion--bomberpilots or missile launchers would probably be good examples, any ranged weapons' operators I guess.

reply


a really good cinematic example of the sort Ancient Greek tragedy you you mentioned is Iphigenia - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076208/reference


I'm proud to say my poetry is only understood by that minority which is aware.

reply