MovieChat Forums > Sin City: A Dame to Kill For (2014) Discussion > What a piece of utter TRASH (spoilers)

What a piece of utter TRASH (spoilers)


Wow... and I say that in a bad way. Perhaps the worst way possible.

I should preface this by saying that Sin City (2005) is one of my favorite films. It's truly the epitome of entertainment with some awesome performances and a groundbreaking style. It's translation/adaptation of Miller at his finest.

This? This movie was a mess from beginning to end. To no one's surprise, the only good story here is classic Miller (A Dame to Kill For). Everything else is pure and utter garbage. The JGL story added nothing and had absolutely no point. Narrative wise it doesn't even fit in with all the other stories. As for Nancy's Revenge, Alba is just a terrible actress. No wonder it fell flat. She shouldn't be a main character.

Willis added nothing to the story. Senator Roark seeing him in the mirror was stupid and made no sense.

Mickey Rourke looked bored and his makeup was off. Lastly, wtf was the point of that opening with him beating the frat boys? It was so random and again, added NOTHING to the narrative.

Josh Brolin was decent but paled in comparison to Clive Owens. Seriously, where was Owens? Why didn't he return? Josh Brolin in a Clive Owens wig was just ridiculous. He looked pathetic. I was hoping he would transform into Owens after the plastic surgery but no...

Recasting Miho... terrible choice. Recasting Bob... even worse choice. Michael Madsen was perfect in the original. Why they replaced him with Pivens is anyone's guess.

Meloni was decent, he looked just like his comic counterpart but pieces of DTKF were missing. In the book Mort and Bob realize that Ava is lying when they speak to the landlord. It's a turning point in the story because it shows that Mort will still do anything for her. Yet that's totally missing from the movie.

Overall this was just an incredibly poor film compared to the original. I thought the critics would be wrong, I didn't want to listen to the 40% on RT. But it's absolutely right. This movie is about to flop at the box office and it deserves to flop. Powers Boothe gave the only good performance in the entire film. As someone who LOVES the original and all of Miller's Sin City comics, I think this may be the most disappointing film I've ever watched in my life. Never have I been more excited and let down at the same time.

reply

So how were jessica alba dance scenes ?

reply

The dance scenes? Only good thing about Alba in this entire film. Then you realize the fact that Alba is playing a stripper and should be naked like Nancy in the book but she refuses to do nudity.

reply

does she at least wear anything revealing or do any sexy moves ?

reply

[deleted]

Erm...No.

This Coven doesn't need a new Supreme. It needs a new rug. - Fiona Goode, Witch Bitch Supreme!

reply

No to what? If you think Nancy's Revenge is a better story than That Yellow Bastard then you are an idiot.

If you think Pivens was a better Bob than Madsen then you are an idiot.

If you think Brolin was better as Dwight than Owens then you are an idiot.

reply

Just no to your negative posts. Why don't you piss off back to the Sam and Cat boards you Ariana Grande loving troll.

This Coven doesn't need a new Supreme. It needs a new rug. - Fiona Goode, Witch Bitch Supreme!

reply

Negative posts aren't allowed on imdb boards? No one can be critical of this film on this board? Seriously? And I'm not exactly a troll considering Sin City is my favorite film. Are you always a dumbass?

reply

Didn't realise 10 year olds like Sin City too. Your post wasn't just negative, it was full of crap!

This Coven doesn't need a new Supreme. It needs a new rug. - Fiona Goode, Witch Bitch Supreme!

reply

[deleted]

There are much better ways to express an opinion than writing it in such a deeply negative tone. You can be negative about a film without trashing it completely. It's as if he wants everyone else to hate it. By the way *beep* you Sylvie.

This Coven doesn't need a new Supreme. It needs a new rug. - Fiona Goode, Witch Bitch Supreme!

reply

Stop building yourself up for movies and the disappointment won't be so bad.

reply

Josh Brolin and sequel or remake = Fail.

reply

I haven't seen it yet, but I'll be going tomorrow, and maybe I'm wrong, but I'm sure I'll enjoy it. Why you ask? Because years of movies based off comics Have hardened me to the kind of disappointment you felt after watching this film. It took a while, but X men DOFP was my turning point. I think with comic movies you have to go in with the state of mind that it has nothing to do with the books you read, and enjoyed. that way if it's close to it's source it's an awesome bonus, and if it's not you can still be entertained.

However a *beep* film is a *beep* film no matter what it's based off of. I hope I don't walk away from this with the same angst you did. I'll come back, and post after I've seen it.

reply

The JGL story made me want to leave the theater as he died. Seriously, he had the most intriguing story and then he just got shot, adding nothing and if anything screwing up any narrative the story had

reply

he dies? then wtf put him in the movie for? wtf seriously

reply

I honestly thought "A Dame to Kill For" storyline was the weakest part of the whole film. That's just me though.

reply

This is almost the perfect review of the film, and echoes my thoughts exactly. I agree that A Dame To Kill For and Powers Boothe performance were really all that I took from the movie. Many roles were terribly miscast, and the replacements from the first movie didn't work in any way. It still looked good, I would give it that, but overall it pales in comparison to what made the first so good. Very disappointing to say the least, and will probably put an end to the Sin City franchise.

reply

Devon Aoki was pregnant when they were filming. Even if she wasn't, she hasn't acted in five years. She's retired. She wasn't going to be in it.

Michael Madsen talked very negatively about the first film, and that he hated filming with the green screen. He wasn't coming back, even if they wanted him back. Most people watching it won't even realize it's the same character.

Roark seeing Hartigan was to show that Nancy wasn't crazy when she was seeing him. She was seeing him. Hartigan says earlier that he is a ghost that has to see Nancy in pain due to what he did.

Someone else on here explained that Levitt's story was to show more about Senator Roark. We've only heard conjecture about how evil and corrupt he is. Just Willis being in jail and keeping his son out of jail. That's about it. We've never seen it fully. NOW, we've seen it. We saw him murder a woman just for a pun. He maimed his own son for the same pun. Then, he kills him, and no one did anything. He wins, because he always wins. This is supposed to be a bleak town, and it's thus far the only story where the bad guy wins.

................
"Fine. You want to eat? Let's see if you can eat... PIZZA!!!"

reply