MovieChat Forums > Scoop (2006) Discussion > Flimsy Plausibility

Flimsy Plausibility


Too many things too count that just made no sense, and actually like most Woody Allen movies just for the anxiety-driven dialogue of his character.

Like why would Hugh Jackman leave the key to Betty Gibson's flat under the French Horn in his music room, when he already knew his Tarot Deck had been discovered there? And why did he not CHANGE the combination to that Music room when he realized others had been in there?

And when you're in love with someone, you think they are gong to row out on a lake by themselves? Don;t you want to spend every moment with your new-found love?

Was he ultimately asking to be caught?

reply

Scoop does not work as a murder mystery (IMDb lists it as a "Comedy | Mystery").

SPOILERS

* In a murder mystery there needs to be more than one main suspect. In Scoop only the suspected Hugh Jackman character (Peter Lyman) has enough screen time to be considered.
Yes, the handyman (who we never see) confessed to killing some prostitutes. But the movie was not going to end there and the clues kept pointing to Jackman's character. He is the only one who could have killed Betty.
* Bottom line; after about half way through, there was no mystery.

* The Jackman character is the most inept murderer.
By bluekkarma;

"Was he ultimately asking to be caught?"

I don't think he was even that clever.
- As bluekkarma mentioned Jackman's character left the key to Betty's apartment in the place that he knew it would eventually be discovered.
I thought maybe someone would kill Allen's character at the dead prostitute's apartment. But no, Allen's character is allowed to have the evidence but just conveniently dies in an accident for a cheap laugh and to end the movie quicker.
- Jackman's character, Peter Lyman, is at the lake with Scarlett Johansson's character.
He pushed her into the lake thinking she could not swim. But Scarlett's character didn't say previously that she could not swim. She had said she had a cramp.
Watch "The Talented Mr. Ripley" for an example of how a person in a boat can be killed.

* As for the comedy. Sometimes it worked. (And I am a big fan of many of Allen's films.)
But I didn't like the Allen character repeating the line; "You are a credit to your race."
This is something that a comedian might say in the 30s when performers wore black face and when African Americans had few rights and were routinely lynched.
The setting of Scoop is in modern day London. Telling people about their race does not fit.
And I noticed in the last scene when there was a black woman standing in the background, and Allen's character was complimenting people, he then didn't bring up the race line.

* To Sum It Up; for my personal taste, the story of Scoop was at the level of a weak TV mystery series.
- Allen has used the of a magician to get someone to disappear (Oedipus Wreaks).
He has tried the idea of a character who can disappear to learn information (Alice).
Scoop is a variation on this but it is not as well done.

5/10 imo.

BB ;-)

it's just in my opinion - imo -

reply

What has happened to people?

Plausibility, are you serious?!!

This is a comedy, ghost story, mystery, that's written for Woody to tell jokes. It's a fun wacky type of thing like an old time movie from the 40s.

It's meant to be funny and it doesn't matter what kind of plot exists.

reply