MovieChat Forums > The Standard (2006) Discussion > Why? Please, somebody tell me why,,,

Why? Please, somebody tell me why,,,


**************SPOILERS********************




Why did I just see this film? Why did I invest a good 70 minutes investing my time into these well written, greatly acted characters, only to have it all taken away by a stupid "school shooting" twist that is a completely manipulative plot device? The movie works greatly without it, as it deals with coming of age struggle in a way that isn't often presented in film. We learn to like and feel for these characters only to have them taken away in a completely disjointed and unconnected way. The only possibly point and meaning behind this film that I can find is to show the audience what it is like to have this happen to them, to put us in the place of the victims. And personally, I really don't think that the audience deserves that. We are already saturated in enough violence and carnage, and when school shootings do occur, we all feel it, whether we are connected or not to it. I really don't think the audience deserves to be put through this film.

The film is manipulative and, honestly, twisted. Jordan Albertsen is a deplorable filmmaker of the worst kind for having created this film. The only reason I can see someone making this film with noble intentions is if they themselves experienced it and filmmaking was the only way they could "get it out". From what I've read, this isn't the case. This is why I say that Jordan Albertsen, despite being very skilled at his craft, is a manipulative, despicable filmmaker.

If Albertsen really wanted it to be a resonating and strong message, not to mention having the story remain character-driven as opposed to just sheerly plot-driven, why not have the kid commit suicide in his car? This helps to serve the theme of change, and how not everyone does change. Not everyone finds their happiness. This can also show how the death of even someone that we don't know or don't care about can resonate deeply.

Instead, but having it play out like a generic "twist" ending, by having the audience think he commits suicide in the beginning, "but wait! He actually gets out and kills everyone!", it is extremely dishonest and *beep* This isn't a story that should be told in a twisty way. This is a story that should be told straightforward, without trying to play trickery on the audience. When the shootings begin, it almost feels as though the filmmakers are saying "Ha ha ha! Gotcha! You thought he was killing himself? Nooo! He kills everyone else! Betcha didn't see that coming! Ha ha ha! Gotcha!" 'Deplorable' is the first word that comes to mind. It takes a heartless, completely unethical director to make this movie in this way.

So please, tell me why I just spent an hour and a half of my time getting to know these characters just to have the "rug pulled out from under me" with a slick "twist" of the school shooting? Why should I ever recommend to anyone to see this film? Why should anyone want to get wrapped up into the stories of these characters just to have us twisted by a horrible plot device? To create controversy? To stir up debate? To piss people like me, who actually put thought and time into movies, off? Why?

I'm just glad that, after Tuesday's events at VTU, this movie will never be picked up for distribution. Not without taking out all elements of school shootings, which would actually make this a worthy and watchable film.

reply

I think it was done to pound the concept that standards are useless and actually deprive people of enjoying life to the fullest. Albertsen wanted to show the viewers that they should never allow the forces of society's expectations to control them because life is fragile and one who allows this is actually not living them self.

Although the scene was very powerful and very well directed, I don't think the movie should have ended this way either. This almost contradicts what I said above, but it also seemed Albertsen took such an optimistic message about being a teen and struggling with conformity and immediately turned it around. With that ending, he pretty much says that differentiation is useless.

reply

**SPOILERS**


Great win for Jordan at this festival.

It was so ironic to see this film a day before what happened in Virginia. I never thought about it in the context of what you stated in this post, but the theme is very well represented with the kid committing suicide at the end of the movie. Reflecting on the time you have, etc. It was very interesting to hear your opinion. I hope your wrong about it being picked up for distribution...now, it might be more difficult. The fragility of life and using what time you have left to the fullest is a strong message in a powerful character driven movie. For 96% of the movie, it is a character driven piece incapsulating high school life. it would be a shame to wash all that away.

reply

I thought it was the most well thought out movie I've seen in a long time and that it is only good WITH it's ending. It makes the frustrating "day in the life" focus make sense. That's how things happen; people are jerks, eat lunch, little goods, little bads, say the right thing, don't know there own feelings... and then everyones everything changes, I think that's(sadly) real. I think the whole movie is hard to watch, in a good way, and should get distribution. It's not a happy movie that I could watch over & over but it IS good.

reply

to the first poster: Wow you got really worked up about this movie. Isn't that what a movie is supposed to do? Inspire emotion.

reply