MovieChat Forums > Brotherhood (2006) Discussion > Did Brotherhood have a proper series fin...

Did Brotherhood have a proper series finale or was it cancelled.


I really want to watch this show but I don't want to invest all the time if the show was just cancelled and they don't wrap up enough of the story.

reply

it was cancelled but everything was wrapped up nicely. it was definitely a good conclusion.

watch it

reply

I personally believed it got blackballed by showtime. its finale was a good way to wrap up season 3 but not a good way to end the series. hopefully they will take another crack at it in a couple of years. just hopefully everyone will come back

reply

Great show. I discovered the show in its second season, and it quickly became one of my favorites.

I agree with classclown: I was not satisfied with the way the show ended. Maybe the powers that be will come to their senses and Brotherhood will return.

"You have to have faith for that to work on me, Mr. Vincent." Jerry Dandridge

reply

I'm a big fan of the show and to me it ended the only way it could have, Even if it had run for a few more years this was an appropriate ending. I was satisfied.

reply

It ended well. However, it ended way before it's time.

reply

it ended the only way it could have
Without doubt. No heavy cliffhangers and far more important, no silly closure arcs. I hate when shows feel the need to have so much closure the whole cast "moves on" for big change. Like we need to see a drastic change to close it out. That is worse than cliffhangers. This was perfect.

There has to be small change and some open ends. As odd as that sounds, but that's how a show needs to end.

reply

How come on Direct TV's channel they advertise there are brand new episodes of the Brotherhood ?

reply

they're just rebroadcasting the series

reply

Thanks. They actually say brand new episodes. I guess for Direct TV it is.

reply

I think Brotherhood had an amazing ending for a series without ruining things it ended just how it should have and the way it ended worked perfectly as a series finale it couldn't come back for another season the way the ended it.

reply

I just watched the finale and it was so well written. It was a perfect ending to a compelling series.

reply

SPOILER

So, just to make sure I got it all right :

- Tommy is speaker and Michael is gone.
- The old speaker (Don) takes the wrap, yet the waterfront deal goes through, making Tommy a rich man.
- Freddy runs the Hill again and Colin works for him now.
- Declan fell off the wagon after failing to nail Tommy.



So what about Cath ? I was never quite sure what Colins intention was when he left her in that diner. Going back to shoot Michael so they would be safe, dumping her and going to ask Michael to forgive him, ... ?

Faith means making a virtue out of not thinking. - Bill Maher

reply

I just finished the series for the first time, enjoyed it quite a bit. The series finale is pretty satisfying, though I was still left wanting to see more.

reply

I thought "Brotherhood" was a great, underrated show, and would love to see more seasons, but I'd bet my left nut against a sawbuck that the show will never return.

I did think the final episode was satisfying, though, mostly because it ends with Michael Caffee in exactly the same position he was before the show began ... exiled from Providence, in parts unknown.

http://ocdviewer.com

reply

I think this is one of the best-written shows I saw. As goes for the finale, I have not seen a better one.

reply

[deleted]

What?

Tommy wanted Michael dead. That's why he didn't tip him off that Freddy wanted him dead and that Moe was waiting to ice him after the wedding as he was tipped off by his daughter.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah but like you said yourself, Tommy green lit Michael's murder in the first few episodes. So Rose's quote is hardly a hard and fast axiom of truth.

I agree he changed his mind as his conscience (and mother) got the better of him and gave the snow plow contracts to Freddy. But his intentional failure to tip off his brother to Moe lying in wait of him after the wedding I thought couldn't make it clearer that he had changed his mind again. He had just avoided the close call of speaking to a wire wearing Marty Trio and just decided that enough is enough ... that having his brother around just wasn't worth the cost and hassles it was causing him. Especially if it meant he had to deal with this prick prosecutor out to get him because of who his brother was.

It's also why Tommy straight out told Michael at the end of the 2nd season that he knew Moe was waiting to have him killed after the wedding which caused their big fallout remember?

reply

[deleted]

I'm not sure how tipping Michael off to Moe waiting to kill him would have caused him scrutiny. If he did that, it's not like Freddy would know Michael was tipped off by his brother. Tommy didn't have to tell Freddy that he knew he was trying to kill Michael.

If you remember Tommy did have a heart to heart chat with Michael during the wedding in which he urged him to leave town and go far away so he didn't end up dead. I got the sense this was where he planned to tip off Michael but chose not to when Michael refused to leave town.

reply

[deleted]

"Both of those possibilities are instantly traced back to Tommy. If Mike killed Moe, then Freddy would know that his hitman was specifically targeted. Had Michael fled the wedding reception, then Moe would've told Freddy that Mary-Rose saw the hit about to go down."

Oh come on. Do you seriously believe that? There's no WAY Freddy could instantly know that Michael was tipped off if Moe failed to ice Michael and was killed instead. Moe's not exactly known as the most competent guy in the world. There's NO WAY to deduce that Michael was tipped off and even LESS REASON to believe he was tipped off from Tommy if Moe was dead. It's not like Moe had shared meticulous details with Freddy on his airtight plan on how he was going to ice Michael so Freddy would have enough confidence that Moe would get the job done. Moe's whole approach was half ass and ad libbed. He didn't even know how it was going to happen and Freddy knew Moe was a dumbass and could easily make a mistake. There would be just as much reason to believe Moe made a mistake than that Michael got tipped off. He could suspect a tipoff but he could never know for sure, and the tipoff could have happened from a bystander that saw Moe waving a gun for all he would know. If Moe was dead, to claim Freddy would instantly know the tipoff came from Tommy when there's no conceivable way he could possibly know that is just nonsensical.

I think if you were being honest with yourself you would acknowledge how paper thin your claim is.

And even if Michael escaped and Moe survived I doubt he would even admit to Freddy that he was spotted by Tommy's daughter to save himself the embarrassment of having Freddie mock him for getting spotted by a kid. But even if he did, so what? Freddie would have much larger problems to worry about Michael gunning for him for setting him up than to worry about Tommy. And what's he gonna do to Tommy, jeopardize the snow plow contracts he got by bringing scrutiny on himself and Tommy? No that would be ludicrous. He's going to try to assassinate Tommy for tipping his brother off that Moe was planning on killing him? No, that would be ludicrous too. Wise guys like Freddie of all people would know that assassinating politicians would bring heat on him like no tomorrow that he would never want.

He would have to expect that Tommy would try and save his brother. They're family after all. He would hold it against Moe for screwing it up by getting spotted and would either have to go to war with Michael or try to make peace with him.

I agree that he urged Michael to leave because he was facing heat from Ellis. But it seemed to me like he was planning on tipping him off should Michael agree to disappear. But since he didn't, he chose not to because in spite of Michael saying Tommy could tell Ellis whatever he wanted to Tommy still didn't want the scrutiny of Ellis that would remain from Michael sticking around.

In many ways that conversation was a mirror of the final conversation at the end of season 3. In both Tommy was kind of giving Michael an ultimatum although Michael didn't realize it. In the season 3 ultimatum Tommy was much more explicit, saying in 24 hours you'll be either dead or in jail. Michael said there's no way he could ever go back to jail, to which Tommy said "I know, you're my brother, I really don't want to see you dead".


reply

[deleted]

"- Moe's dead
- Michael has vanished
- Tommy threatened to have Michael get rid of Moe.

What do you think will register in Freddy's mind during that moment?"

Sorry I don't recall when Tommy threatened to have Michael get rid of Moe unless you're talking about at the wedding, at which point he didn't have to show his cards to Freddy.

So at that point Freddy would first think that Moe bungled the hit because Moe is such a dumbass. Of course he would have to consider Michael got tipped off but there is NO SMOKING GUN THAT LEADS TO TOMMY. Sorry but there's just isn't. There'd be more reason to believe one of his own guys tipped off Michael to curry favor with him since Michael was coming up and could challenge Freddy than to think a tip came from Tommy who would have no plausible way of knowing. There's not only no smoking gun, but there's no trail whatsoever that would make Freddy connect the dots that Tommy could have obtained that information. None. So your claim that Moe's death would automatically "be traced back to Tommy" just isn't true and it's bizarre that you would refuse to acknowledge this fact.

"He could suspect a tipoff but he could never know for sure, and the tipoff could have happened from a bystander that saw Moe waving a gun for all he would know.


Really?..."

Sure. What if it had been some good samaritan bystander who saw Moe sneaking up and trying to ice Michael in the middle of the parking lot and yelled out a warning to Michael who then blew away Moe? The half ass way Moe had in mind of taking out Michael in the middle of a public parking lot with his gun drawn out and clearly visible while approaching demonstrates how he's hardly the sharpest tool in the drawer. Doing so is subject to all sorts of random possibilities of interference, as he discovered when he was spotted by Tommy's daughter.

"And yet, this same incompetent character is going to be able to make up a believable lie to tell his boss? Freddy has enough sense to know when Moe is lying: he's probably used to prying the truth outta' him on a daily basis."

And he also knows that Moe is a dumbass and could have easily botched the hit. Why is it so hard to admit this? There's no shame in admitting you were wrong, it won't be the end of the world.

"Tommy is suppose to represent state's government and would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law if he was ever caught accepting cash, illegally. I'm certain that whatever would happen to Freddy - in this mutually assured destruction scenario - worse would happen to Tommy."

The point is that there was no reason for Freddy to evoke a MAD scenario regardless if there was asymmetric damage. That there would be any potential damage to him at all would be unwanted. Tommy had done him the favor of giving his son a proper burial so he already had his foot in the door where he felt Tommy could be a future asset to do business with. You don't burn a potential asset like that because your dumbass surrogate was stupid enough to get spotted by the mark's niece who tipped him off, and you ESPECIALLY don't burn an asset like that if it's going to bring any potential heat upon yourself. Because like I said, what could he reasonable expect if Tommy had information like that but to tip off his brother? But this tangent largely irrelevant anyway since I've already explained how there's NO reason to suspect Tommy could have knowledge like that if Moe were dead.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

bring. it. back.

reply