DVD Review


This is basically a documentary. It doesn't really have a plot. It's not pornography. This film chronicles the state of gay life in New York City between the Stonewall incident & the beginning of the AIDS epidemic.

Regarding Stonewall, I think it is necessary to say a few words for younger gay people who have been told that we owe everything we have today to that particular night in history. I believe that some younger people honestly believe that gay life before Stonewall was just one long horror after another. It's just not true. The fact is that Stonewall was a very important event in gay history; but it wasn't really the beginning of anything. The fact is that for many years before Stonewall, the gay movement had been in progress. Prior to Stonewall, gay life was very much in evidence in New York and in most other cities of any size. In some ways it wasn't all that different than it is today providing you had a healthy opinion of yourself. (For instance, The Boys in the Band was a snapshot of gay life before Stonewall.) Like the characters in that film, many gay people had issues with self respect; and we still have gay people with those issues today. The problem was that many more gay people were self-loathing then and allowed people and officials to push them around at will. There were still laws that could be enforced, even though they rarely were. Psychiatrists still officially listed homosexuality as an illness, even though most truly enlightened psychiatrists taught self-acceptance. I wouldn't want to go back to the time before Stonewall; but I do want to make the point that it was possible to live life as a well adjusted gay man before that time.

Bars, like Stonewall, were everywhere. The problem is that they were owned or very much influenced by organized crime. The police acted as protectors for these establishments as long as they received a certain agreed-upon payoff. If the bar owner failed to pay, then there were raids because the law allowed such things. During election years, there were raids because politicians needed to get votes from people who were concerned about things that were none of their business. (Has anything really changed with that?) These raids weren't so much directed toward gay people as they were a penalty to bar owners who failed to live up to their agreements with the police and organized crime. In fact, if the bar owners & the police were in sync, there would often be advance notice of a "necessary" raid.

Fortunately there came a time, beginning with Stonewall, when gay people demanded changes to laws which made this charade obsolete. Even though gay life existed in plentiful supply before the summer of 1969, Stonewall represents a kind of epicenter that symbolizes a time when gay people just got fed up with all the ridiculous idiocy and started to stand up for themselves. That was a good thing; and we owe much to the people of that time who finally had the guts to stand up to the people in power. However, it's important to understand that this entire movement was a progression. It didn't happen in one night. In fact, it's still happening today; and we still have quite a way to go.

Gay Sex in the 70's is a look at the years after Stonewall in New York City. Some people have been critical that the film deals almost exclusively with New York. I don't see that as a problem. Other films have dealt with gay life in San Francisco during this time, such as The Times of Harvey Milk. The fact is that New York is, and always has been, the cultural center of this country. What happens in New York filters down to the rest of the country eventually. San Francisco is certainly a wonderful city, but like the rest of California, it is an entity unto itself.

This film is not pornography; and contrary to what some people have alleged, there is almost no pornography in this film. Someone in a previous post said that he/she wasn't sure whether the film was showing pornographic movie shots or actual photos. I assure you that, other than a couple of scenes where pornography is being directly discussed, these images are actual footage from gay life in The City during that time. It is a fascinating look at history.

This film may also serve as a lesson of sorts. When gay people finally started standing up for their rights, they focused almost entirely on the right of sexual freedom. Sexual freedom is certainly a fun thing, at least in the beginning. However, it can also become a very addictive behavior that leads to tragic results. This film demonstrates this very clearly.

Our history of standing up for our rights has taken a natural and overall positive progression. We have come from a time where we focused almost entirely on sexual freedom to a time where we are focusing on more important issues. Life is like that. People don't go to sleep one night as an oppressed minority and wake up the next morning as a fully integrated part of society. During the last fifty years, we've made incredible advancement. We've also made some mistakes; but we've learned from them. This film gave me great hope, even though it also made me remember friends who didn't survive to see how far we've come.

I recommend this film to anyone who is interested in gay history.

reply

Bravo! That review was profound. Seriously... you need to be a WRITER.

reply

Having seen it now, I might say that it was a bit dry. I don't know what I was expecting. I wasn't expecting any shocking footage (though, in fact, there was a bit of that). I just thought the whole thing would be more fun! It wasn't - and several of my friends were dissapointed, too. Actually, I feel asleep half way though - and had to finish the last part the next day. It's INTERESTING, don't get me wrong - but I just think the whole thing should have been a bit brighter in theme!

reply

Having seen it now, I might say that it was a bit dry.


Most documentaries are a bit dry unless you find the subject matter extremely interesting. I did find it interesting, probably because it dealt with a period of time just before my own coming out. (Actually, I started coming out toward the very end of the 70's when I was in my late teens. However, even though I lived in New York in my early years, I really didn't experience very much of that time. My early gay years were spent during the time the New York gay community was so terribly devastated by AIDS, so the period depicted in this film seems like such a carefree time to me ... almost like a fantasy.)

reply

I think it's important to point out that this "review" was written by one of the producers of this embarrassing monstrosity of a film. The film is just depressing and embarrassing to the gay community!! If you want to watch a bunch of old, pathetic "men" who had NO lives back in the 70's brag about sleeping around and how fun it was...enjoy. Otherwise, do the right thing and don't condone this kind of garbage. You would be better off donating the money spent on the DVD or rental to an AIDS charity.

reply

You obviously have no interest in or empathy with the history of the gay community. Certainly by today's standards this film seems foreign; but it does represent a time in gay culture. Whether you approve or disapprove is not important. It is what it is; and this film depicts that time. I can barely wait until YOU are an old, pathetic man and some young, shallow person ... such as yourself ... forty years from now passes judgement on your experiences. Things change ... no doubt about that. Hopefully once you gain a little maturity ... or intelligence ... we can expect some change in you.

Oh, and by the way, I'm not sure how you decided I was one of the producers of the film. I was actually about twelve years old in 1970. I don't think I was producing films then ... or even now, for that matter.

reply

"...it is what it is"

Please NEVER say that phrase again. It makes no sense, and it's a lazy catchphrase when people have nothing to say. I DO care about gay pride and the gay community, THAT is why I am outraged by this film, and I am over 40...so I do know what I am talking about! I witnessed SO many men die from HIV the last 20 years, and the last thing we need is a film glamorizing promiscuous sex that led to the mess we're in today!!

What made me think you were one of the producers is that it makes NO sense for anyone to write as much as you did, especially for a film like this!! Like this film actually has ANY meaning whatsoever!! It is just downright embarrassing for the gay community.

reply

LOL!

I wrote as much as I did because I am a writer. It's as simple as that ... and like most intelligent people, I don't necessarily agree with the practices and behavior I write about. You are correct that the behavior depicted in this film is not advisable; but it resulted from a belief that sexual freedom was part & parcel of gay freedom. That is wrong, of course; but; there are many things that have happened in history that are, in hindsight, quite unfortunate ... many things. I suppose you think that we should not see films about the Holocaust because good Germans wouldn't allow those things today. I'm sure they would not; but we still need the history. It's important.

reply

Uh...that's fine but this film DEPICTS this lifestyle as good. You do get that, right? What part of this film suggests this was "bad" and the behavior shouldn't continue!? If you are a writer, how in the world can you compare the Holocaust to this???

reply

"What part of this film suggests this was "bad" and the behavior shouldn't continue!?"

Probably the part where most people die terribly, and can't be interviewed because they're only faces in pictures and on tiles.

Yeah, pretty sure that's it.

reply