My primary problem was with the film. (I found it boring and muddled. Not the story, mind you...the presentation.)
Oh, mr. shoot from the hip, here. That didn't take long, did it?
So, it's now the "presentation" that's boring and muddled, huh? You're hilarious. Fair enough, then. So, tell us, what is boring and muddled about the presentation?
I found the hippie, i.e. Mike, to be a rather comic figure. I looked him up, and you can imagine my surprise when I learned he was a Marxist.
And, his politics would have what to do with,
a) rather or not he was telling the truth
b) the ..."presentation" of the film being boring and muddled?
Examples, turing.
(He also has a tenuous relationship with THE TRUTH, as the Salon article details...I suggest you check it out.)
Why don't you give some examples as to his tenuous relationship with the truth in this movie? What points that Davis made in Bastards of the Party were not truthful?
reply
share