MovieChat Forums > Madea's Family Reunion (2006) Discussion > MESSAGE? BEATING KIDS IS OKAY.

MESSAGE? BEATING KIDS IS OKAY.


Tyler Perry seems completely unaware of the contradictory messages espoused in Family Reunion.

For example...

One one side it's played for laughs when Madea slaps the kid on the bus or hits Nikki a belt. Such scenes seem to suggest that it's helpful (and funny) to slap some sense into children.

Yet the scenes with Carlos pounding on Lisa are meant to be taken with deadly seriousness.

Conclusion: beating kids is funny, smacking grown women/spouses is not.
Isn't there a problem here?

reply

You bet there's a problem. This gross exuse for a film is full of contradictions like the ones you mentioned.

I particularly hated the advice of Lisa's mother who told her to suck it up and be a good wife, kind of suggesting that to do so is to follow god's laws.

A terrible film.

reply

Point #1: There was no contradiction here. Yes, beating bad kids who disrespect adults IS NECESSARY. You see what trying to reason to little kids will get you -in the middle of the grocery story with Little Johnny slapping the hell out of his mother. No, beating GROWN adults is not good, especially in a MARRIAGE where both partners are supposed to be equals. Doesn't seem contradictory to me.

The point of the film is that kids need to mind adults and not disrespect them. Notice that the kids that got whooped are a 12 year old boy who told a grown woman to "shut up", a 12 year old boy who told a grown woman that she was going to "beat her up", and another 12 year old girl who repeatedly disobeyed a grown woman's orders (to hang up the phone). Madea tried talking and the talking didn't work. Why would she keep talking to a little kid to get them to act right? It's a movie. Get over it.

Point #2: Um hello? You obviously missed the point of the film. Lisa's mother was the "villain", for a lack of a better word, in this film. The point was made very obviously in the film that Lisa's mother was crazy and we know why she had the opinion that she did about Lisa "sucking it up." That was the conflict in the movie...you understand the point of conflict in a fictional story, right? It's part that thing they need to develop for a fictional story, you know a PLOT??? In order to develop a plot, u need a conflict and then a resolution. Idiot.

reply




I'm black and am from Texas and know a little sumin sumin about kids getting their butts whooped. In the movie the kids that got slapped and hit were eiher
1. being disrespectful, or
2.being bad and disobedient
Everyone has a right (me as a 14 yr old girl saying this) to hit their kids if they're bad. Plus, you over exagerrated it, the kids weren't beat, they were hit. Carlos beat his fiance. Get it straight. And dont tyry to start stuff that u have no idea wat ur talking about.


If Practice Makes Perfect and Nobody's Perfect,Why Practice?

reply

Bravo! Can't say it better myself.

reply

The 12-year-old girl (the one with the phone) was never whooped. Madea only yelled at her and she (the kid) went back in the house. That's it.

reply

thank you SOO MUCH for saying something

reply

[deleted]

Point #1: There was no contradiction here. Yes, beating bad kids who disrespect adults IS NECESSARY.


CORRECTION: No one has the right to BEAT anyone, especially a child. However, there are times when a child needs to be spanked. There is, believe it or not, a difference between spanking a child on the bottom and beating him or her with a belt, a switch, a fist, etc.

reply

Thank you Jara. I have a child I don't beat but there are plenty of kids who need a good butt whooping. I am a school administrator and daily I watch kids curse and talk back to their parents. They have no respect. My child was raised to know that I am the one in charge. Unfortunately, I watch parents begging their kids to behave. THAT is why we have so much wrong with kids today. This is a movie but maybe some people could take a little lesson from it. Abuse is wrong a butt whooping with discipline in mind for the child is ok. Notice that Madea was aiming for the butt and followed it up with loving, understanding and limit setting.

reply

There is nowhere in God'd law where it says 'women let your husband beat you'. It says 'husbands love your wive's as Christ loves the church'. This movie portrayed all the things that goes on in most families, they're just kept hidden.

reply

It's a movie of course beating your kids aren't okay. But I honestly think some of you are reading too much into this. I was beat as a kid,and I was not offended at all by any of his movies. Different people/background puinsh their children in different ways. And for those of you who aren't from these different backgrounds or who have never grown up in the type of house hold I or parts of a family that I have grown up in. I know that you won't get the meaning of what it is like nor would you understand. To beat a child isn't right. But then again maybe if Jeffery Dahmer would have gotten this tale end whipped maybe he wouldn't have been eating things that he shouldn't.

reply

um actually if u pay attetion shes defending the guy who is beating her.
she's supposed to be a bad mother not defending GODS laws. and God never said that beating ur wife is okay. You should really read the bible man and talk to a pastor about it all. Study to show urself approved.

reply

Its not okay to "beat" anyone but kids do need to be punished and sometimes put in there places. Kids are not suppose to say "shut up old lady". If he had done that at my school when I was there he probably would have gotten jumped by some of the other boys. I see kids all the time cussing at their mothers and the mothers don't know what to do. They expect there mothers to feed, clothe, protect and shelter them but they don't want to do anything in return. All they need is a good foot in their behinds. The world would be a better place because of it and I don't care who doesn't like it. These kids get away with too much. They cut school and they want to send the parents to jail. When I was growing up, I was afraid to cut school because I knew that if my parents found out and I would be in big trouble. Now, a lot of the parents are afraid of their kids, which is there own fault. I'll be damned if I'm gonna let some kid that I raised and cared for punk me in my own home. You're not doing these kids any favors by doing that because they are going to try that with the wrong person.

Before trying cookies for the first time, Cookie Monster's name was Sid.

reply

Umm, this is a bad movie but I'm sure everyone who isn't mentally handicapped realised that Lisa's mother was an antagonist and that her advice or morals weren't to be followed.

Having said that, religious people tend to be the most violent domestically because their 'god' condones this so I wouldn't be surprised if some religious nut got ideas from this movie.

reply

Beating kids is okay when it comes to those who are like the little girl... disrespective...

I mean when your black it makes since... I mean its a black movie... its aimed at black people

As for the abuse... I mean we can't have a laugh about that for thats everyday *beep* but however it was funny when she pulled a Al green's wife... you know hot grits and a skillet lol

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

Demon boy, that's a terrible response.

Wasn't Lisa just as "disrespectful" (an abstract term) as Nikki? By your logic, they both should be beaten.

reply

No.. i did not mean it sound to make it like that...

Nikki was a little hoodlum and was whooped into a real woman

Lisa was a woman who allowed her *beep* husband to whoop her ass like Ike did Tina just to make her mother happy...

In no *beep* way possible is it funny seeing a black woman muchless any woman getting beat like a bad dog

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

But, see, you're still arguing for the beating of a female. Just because one is young, it's okay to do it to make her "a real woman"?

I'm sure there are lots of parents who hit their children or spouses and use that same excuse - that the punishment is necessary to magically transform those weaker than they are into "real" women/men.

Also you're using abstract, unquantifiable terms. What is a "real woman"? One who respects an elder who abuses her?

reply

[deleted]

Ah, it's clear now. If you aren't sneaky about smacking around a person it's fine. Make sure that everyone knows you're administering beatings and belt whip away while the rest of us chuckle. It all makes sense...

reply

i think you are being unfair. problem with a lot of parents is that they dont want to punish their child when anybody can see it (because they want to pretent to be a perfect family, with perfectly obedient kids), instead giving in to the child's demand (e.g. buying the candy the kid wants), sending the messsage to the child that treatening to scream, or getting angry in public will aways get them what they want.
a child has to listen to it's parents, if he continually refuses that he has to be punished (i think that refusal to punish a disobedient child makes you a bad parent), privatly or publicly (though of course never unreasonably harsh), whereas no man or woman ever has to be obedient towards their spouse, meaning 'punishment' is never in place.

reply

If they whip their kids, their kids should be taken away by DCF. It is NEVER, EVER ok to whip a child.

All it does it perpetuate a cycle of abuse. All children learn is violence is good.

reply

Let me try to make it perfectly clear

I DON'T CONDONE abbuse of woman... I live with my mother and consider myself a somewhat gentleman (I curse to often thats really my only problem)

And as someone said it was corporal punishment... and most black people believe it... now of coarse i don't support it for i'm on the receiving in...
Its not abbuse for the fact it only happens when i do something bad and i mean really bad like if i get suspeneded or w/e and that hasn;t happen in years so don't start trying to bash me just because i have gotten suspended...

Now... stop messing with me and mixing my words to attempt to make me look like a bad person

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

If you're going to impersonate T.Perry, don't think I'm so foolish as to actually see any of his movies twice!

reply

FIRST OFF...
Nikki was not abused, she was disciplined. Black people are known to whup their kids, because overall it does help keep them in line. Abuse and discipline are two different things. A couple of hits with a belt on ur butt is ot equal to punches and slaps in the Face. My mother never abused me, but if I stepped put of line, every now and then she'd hit me with a belt. her aim wasnt to hurt me seriously...a sore bottom isnt detrimental. Sure it hurt a little, but it wasnt the actual pain of a fist slamming into me, or a slapping me, or shoving me. This type of punishment is known among the African-American race. In the bible it even says "spare the rod, spoil the child". Lisa was getting physically and emotionally abused. Medea was disciplinging Nikki, and in that way only when she was majorly disrespectful. Theres no comparing the two.

~

reply

I stopped reading this thread after the first 2 pages, but if this was said somewhere after that, excuse me.
I'm not gonna say that spankings and reprimands help a child, because someone else will say they don't.
What i dont get is how nobody mentioned that the girl (umm nikki i think) did something wrong, got punished for it, won't do it again.
Fiancee (forgot her name too) did NOTHING wrong and got punished. repeatedly. for NO REASON. so for those of you saying were justifying madea and putting down carlos, yes, we are.
Only an idiot hits people for no reason.

Whoever compared this so called 'everyone is doing it' or 'mob mentality' to the Holocaust, I'd love to hear your tall tales. You seem to be an expert at hyperbole.

reply

I stopped reading this thread after the first 2 pages, but if this was said somewhere after that, excuse me.
I'm not gonna say that spankings and reprimands help a child, because someone else will say they don't.
What i dont get is how nobody mentioned that the girl (umm nikki i think) did something wrong, got punished for it, won't do it again.
Fiancee (forgot her name too) did NOTHING wrong and got punished. repeatedly. for NO REASON. so for those of you saying were justifying madea and putting down carlos, yes, we are.
Only an idiot hits people for no reason.


You were right on the girl's name; it was Nikki.
The fiancee's name was Lisa.

Nikki was not only rude to Madea & other adults, she was also rude to Vanessa's kids. When the little girl said "good morning" to her, Nikki gave her a dirty look. Madea told her to say it back to her; I don't remember whether or not she said it back.

reply

Do you know that Jesus says in the Bible:

"Those who strike a child, better it is that they had never been born".

reply

I'm sorry but i think nothing of the bible... it to me is like the greek and roman myths nice story... but nothing more

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

[deleted]

The Nazis killed more than Jews. They killed Gypsies, Gays, Communists, and sterilized the mentally retarded and blacks from their colonies in Africa who lived in Germany. Later they killed some of their own wounded soldiers rather than leave them to be captured by the Russians. If a member of the underground in an occupied country killed a German soldier they would go to the nearest houses and kill 10 or 20 men and boys at random no matter who you were.

I remember in the 1960's in Dallas when black on black murder was called misdemenor murder. One surprise was that black women killed more black men than white women killed white men. White women just sort of gave up if their ex-husband stalked them.

Black women KNEW they weren't going to get any backup from their church, family or the police. Although many police referred to these killings as a nickel divorce (cost of a .38 bullet). These women usually got 5 year suspended sentences for "Murder without malice" of they showed the husband got what he deserved. That charge no longer exists.



reply

Yes, the big difference here is age and status. A young child should not "disrespect" an elder whose job it is to raise them to be a better, more productive citizen of society. And disrespect is not an abstract term, although it is somewhat subjective. A child that talks back and constantly disobeys rules needs to get disciplined. Each child is different. Some understand talking or taking away something they love or whatever. But there are those other kinds with the hard heads who don't understand anything but physical pain. Those are the ones that got dealt with by Madea in that movie.

You know what the great thing about being a parent or a legal guardian of a child is? You're the boss, which means that what you say (in your subjective opinion) GOES. If the child thinks they're being physically abused, you know what they can do? Pack up their stuff and MOVE OUT of the house that's being paid for by the ADULT they're "disrespecting" (here goes that word again).

Also, comparing a wife getting beat by her husband and child getting beat by her or his parent are like comparing apples and cars. A wife is an equal partner in the marriage. Two adults. A parent/child relationship is not one of equals. The child is supposed to listen to the adult. Period. That's why we have so many bad ass kids in America today, because there are parents who won't lift a finger to discipline their bad kids. I'm so sick of watching kids take the stores with them when they leave because of the temper tantrums and whatnot. And the parents (mostly white) don't have any idea what to do, sitting there trying to rationalize with a child like the kid has a choice in whether or not to act right.

Madea is a movie that is made with blacks in mind, so if you don't understand, oh well! I'm sure Tyler Perry is happy he got your $9.50. lol

reply

I'm tired of these damn posts. STRAIGHT TO THE POINT

This movie was made for black people, and for you white people out there who keep bashing this film, go so BrokenBack Mountain with the homos!

reply

LOL... the homo thing maybe to far but still... that was funny

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

[deleted]

A few questions for you....

"I mean when your black it makes since..."

I think you mean, "it makes sense", right?


"I mean its a black movie... its aimed at black people"

So you're saying only black people can enjoy the movie?

-Art

reply

To question one: Yes i guess so

To question two: no... but it maybe difficult to understand/ or think its funny if your not into black comedies... and when i say black comedies i mean the more raunchy and urban stuff

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

[deleted]

The holocaust and Corporal punishment are different things okay...

Corpural punishment is for kids that need more than a time out and deprivation okay... and Black kids including myself are very rebellious and unfortunately only answer to violence now i know it sounds very weird but it works

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

Mr. Perry, (though I doubt you're the same Perry that made Madea's FR)

I still take issue with the message you're condoning.

If my dog chews up my shoes and I kick it with love, that's legitimate.
If my dog chews up my shoes and I kick it in anger, that's wrong.

If my son never completes his homework and I belt him, but feel love for him as I do it, that's proper.
If my son never completes his homework and I belt him, but do it out of displeasure, that's wrong.

If my girlfriend talks back to me and I slap her in the chops but have great love, respect, and affection for her, it's permissible.
If my girlfriend talks back to me and I slap her in the chops but do it because I've had a bad day at work, that's wrong.

Come now, don't you see the absurdity in trying to justify one action and not the other? Shouldn't violence be wrong regardless of the feelings of the person acting out the attack?

reply

If you dog chew up your shoes and you swat it on the nose, that's fine.
If your dog chews your shoes and you beat it it up or seriously harm it, that's not.

If your son never completes his homework and you spank him, that's fine.
If your some never completes him homework and you leave bruises or, worse, cuts, that isn't.

You don't hit your girlfriend, because you aren't in a position of authority over her.

The point with corporal punishment is to cause some pain, but not harm.

reply

As for Demon boy...

You "only answer to violence". Great answer. As you put it "it works." No wonder there are so many shootings...

So, Demon boy, you've never learned anything without it having it beaten into you? Every bit of education and growth that you've ever had has come via the route of physical coercion?

If you answer no to that then my point is made. You don't need to beat children to teach/educate/love/improve them.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Amen, to that Naked.

I'm not saying that it's all black people who beat their kids, white ppl beat them too. But it's always the ones white or black that I know that were never whipped or punished that ended up with no discipline and no respect for their parents. Now some of them are in jail; of course that sounds just a little extreme but it is true. When a child does not understand the concept of having a bad consequence when they do something bad there is no telling what wrong behaviors a child can learn.
Now, if Medea was just beating them just to take out her fustrations on her like some abusive parents do then yes I would have a problem with it. I mean I remember trying to get smart with my grand-mother once and she popped me on the lip, not with enough force to take my head off, but enough force to make me not want to do it again.






Well, ever since I started soaking cork, I'm the most popular girl at school.-SNL

reply

Its obvious that some people here don't understand black culture..they know nothing about the importance of respecting a parent. Nor do they understand the usage of punishment in black communities. No one advocates child abuse and there is a clear distinction between child abuse and punishing a child.
And its clear the movie doesn't advocate abuse. However, there is clearly cultural differences between how whites and blacks raise children. When I was a child and when I was out of line I got my ass whipped. And guess what, I'm glad my parents punished me for my actions when I was wrong. And I learned from that. See, this is an example once again of people not of the black race that probably don't understand or know the internal sphere of black culture and the black community. I was raised to respect my parents and when I did wrong I got punished...and don't like like white people don't spank their children when they get out of line. Yesterday I was at the supermarket and this white woman smacked her child right across the face at the check out counter because she was acting like a brat and throwing groceries all over the place because her mother wouldn't get her some chips and a chocolate bar. The girl shaped up real quick when her mother punished her..because the girl was wrong and out of line.

reply

As Ladymaryspidermanjane and bjorkpluto seem to have not read the early parts of this thread, I'll copy and paste this for repetition:

So many failures...

Black, white, green, or orange, race has nothing to do with this argument yet demon and crowflow try to lend support to their arguments by saying that "most black people whip their children/believe [in] it."

The "everyone's doing it so it's okay" is a hollow argument.

Here's why. Let's pretend it's 1944. Plenty of Germans are in the process of gassing Jews. On their way to an approximate total of 6 000 000 murdered. The 1939 census list a German population of 80 million. So, since many (not all) of those 80 000 000 Germans were allowing the death of the Jews to happen, it was acceptable.

That's the exact same logic you're using when you're saying "most black people whip their children". The majority is doing it so it makes it okay? No!

reply

You are right it's not okay to whip children, but I do believe that it's important for them to learn that there are consequences to disrespectful behavior at an early age than rather watch them as they break laws in society and end up in prison because they think they can get off with just a warning.

Now I think the reason why so many Black people tend to whip their children out of displine is because of the fact that it's what our ancestors were taught to do. If a slave got out of line with the master, naturally he/she was whipped into correcting that behavior. Soon this picked up amongst mothers and fathers of slave children who didn't want their children whipped like they saw happened to others for disrespecting or not following the orders of the master so they whipped them into correcting that behavior to save them.
So in time that form of displine was passed down through generations because that's pretty much how we learned to correct our child from learning forms of bad behavior.
I'm not making this reply to point a finger and say it was "the white man's fault". I'm just saying why most blacks are okay with this.


Well, ever since I started soaking cork, I'm the most popular girl at school.-SNL

reply

But is it right?

Using violence to teach?

No way, no how, no matter how many years, decades, or centuries it's gone on.

reply

Well, if it were me, I'm not going to beat my child nor am I going to not deal with the problem and just ship my child off to some military academy.
But I am not going to let my child think that talking back to an adult after doing something wrong is okay. I mean what would happen if my child (god forbid) ends up in front of some judge, since all s/he has experienced is the fact that it is ok to do it in front of one authority figure it's going to be ok to do it in front of another.

Instead of just grounding them to their rooms, and taking away all their material possessions that they are going to get back in a matter of weeks, I'd rather them go and volunteer somewhere like at a soup kitchen or pick up litter. Something that says, this could be you if you keep acting the way you do.



Well, ever since I started soaking cork, I'm the most popular girl at school.-SNL

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Ah, man, that headline made me crack up.

"And whoever compared spanking to the Holocaust..."

Comedy gold.

reply

okay corporal(not sure if i spelled it right). is not abuse. whipping a child when they do something wrong with clothes on is not abuse. now tieing them up and whipping them is. a teacher hitting a child with a pattal on their clothes butt is not abuse. now if we discipline our kids we gotta worry about child care taking them away. WTF??? they dont give a damn about those kids. they make it sound so good but reality????? THEY ARE USUALLY THE ONES THAT ARE ABUSIVE. if you whip the child the pain last about a few minutes but boot camp or jail that's where they would be abused at. especially boot camp i dont think i could send mine there bc they way they beat those kids. i believe in rewarding for good behavior but at the same time use coorperal punishment when it is necessary. i would rather whip my child child out of love or switch them 3 times then have some punk ass boot camp instructor or cop beat em to death

reply

ROFLMAO! A guy who names himself after Sam Peckinpah, a director famous for the use of violence in his films, is objecting to violence in a film.

reply

thats an assumption papibear
that could be someone elses name.
an also he probably was not trying to say spanking was the exact same severity as the holocaust. To my understanding he was bringing out the principle "is violence justified". It's called hyperbole.

So that makes your post comedy Platinum.

reply

"Whipping" is beating with whips.
"Whupping" is spanking, sometimes with a paddle or belt.
"Whipping" can result in cuts.
"Whupping" might leave mild bruises, at worst.
kthxbye.

reply

Thank you bjorkpluto,
I mean I've seen it far and again where these ppl who don't at least reprimand their child in a different tone of voice or one good hit on the hand have the most disrespectful children who grow up believing that everything they do is perfectly ok...screw what authority thinks.
It's that passive thinking that talking down your child that makes a child think that they can get away with anything since all they are going to get is a simple talk, grounding, and that's it.






Well, ever since I started soaking cork, I'm the most popular girl at school.-SNL

reply

I also believe in discipline, but I think there are other ways of achieving discipline and teaching respect. Parents who resort to physically hitting their children deserve to be fixed so they can't abuse any more children. Someone wrote this comment a few days ago:

"Yesterday I was at the supermarket and this white woman smacked her child right across the face at the check out counter because she was acting like a brat and throwing groceries all over the place because her mother wouldn't get her some chips and a chocolate bar. The girl shaped up real quick when her mother punished her..because the girl was wrong and out of line."

First of all, I would not have been able to stand by and watch this unfold without intervening on the child's behalf. The girl probably "shaped up" because she was scared and hurt. Beating your children doesn't teach them respect or discipline; it just teaches them fear and violence. I don't care what your race or your culture is -IT'S NEVER OK TO HIT A CHILD.

reply

fine: how do you propose the mother should have punished the child
a: without sending the message: all you'll have to fear from me are empty treats (if you say: if you do that again i will....., you have to be willing to carry out the treat or the kid will call your bluff soon enough)
b: giving a concrete, immidiate punishment: not going to the zoo next week is way to abstract and far away for a little girl
c: you need to apply a regime that is consequent: it has to be clear to a child what punishment it can get for what misdemeanor (not taking away his toys one time and locking him up in his room another)

intervening would be a bad idea, you are insulting the mother (by suggesting she is abusing her child) and only confusing the child (i behaved bad, mommy punished me for that, what does that other person has to do with it? leave my mother alone!). perhaps you can make the mother so ashamed she won't dare to punish her child in public anymore, instead she'll probably stop taking her child to the store to avoid this situation.

i'm also a white woman and i would have done more or less the same: first: if you do that again i will hit you, if he does it again: boom.(of course only if the child is deliberatly making a mess, if it's accidental i'll just help him clean up)
some kids never seriously misbehave, but others do, and then they need to be corrected, and hitting them (obviously not to hard) is sometimes the best way for that.

reply

[deleted]

I've gotta agree on the corporal punishment side of things, but I don't agree that it's only black parents who use physical discipline on their kids. I'm a middle class Canadian white girl, and when I acted out as a kid, my mom would smack my butt. I consider myself a perfectly well-adjusted, respectful, successful person.

I also don't agree with "Tyler_Perry"s statement (Whether it's the actual film's writer/director or not) that it's the intention behind that kind of treatment that marks the difference between abuse and discipline. The important factor is the impact that the action has. Some people react better to corporal punishment than others, and it's important for parents to remain in control of themselves as much as their children.

I thought the movie actually presented this argument pretty damn well. Although Madea disciplined Nikki, she also gave her positive reinforcement when she deserved it, and all in all, it was a good home environment.

~*Nerds do it better*~

reply

no... see basically you trying to start something man...

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

[deleted]

lets not forget what could been seen as mental abuse on Married... with children

Must be nice... to have someone whos smile is so nice it makes the projects feel like a mansion

reply

Look, What im saying is, this movie WAS aimed for black people. Whether or not whites or anyone else understands it, thats your choice. Its aimed at black people because we can relate. Let me see how many whites live like this and act like that

reply

whippin kids is the point , I got my ass beat and im fine , but Carlos beating his lady is not cool and if you pay attention , Madea wasnt beating a kid , the kid was disrepectful and needed punishment

thats whats wrong with the world now , a few people that probably got their ass beat as kids , now thes same people teel us they shouldnt whip kids and you wonder why things like Columbine or all the kids in jail,drugs or pregnancy is going on, now whipping wont stop these things but it sure helped with my generation coming up
Only God Can Judge Me

reply

Abuse is not love. Beatings are not love. But Spanking an out of control child is loving because its shows that the parents care enough about their child that they would rather woop them then have the police do it. By the way, I just read in Essence that Tyler Perry was abused as a child.

reply

You know what..People that listen to that pop psychology crap...will see when their kids get older if they will respect them. Kids need discipline and some kids are rude and need to be punished. Sure you can take away their toys and games..and try that tough love stuff...but a little ass whopping goes a long way to keep the kids in check.

reply

WHOOP THE HELL OUT YOUR KIDS!
If you whoop the hell out them while they're small, there'll be no hell IN them when they get big!

reply

I imagine that if you didn't immediately start trying to buy your child's love and respect with material possessions, you won't have to take them away later when they act up from all the beatings. My parents never hit me and I haven't shot anyone lately, so I guess I turned out all right. You don't have to hit your kid to get respect, I think.

"Nobody who makes pâté this good can be all bad."

reply

It isnt just about respect. Certain behavior warrants a good spanking. I am in no way defending people who abuse children, but what Madea did in this film was not abuse.

reply

Funny that everyone on this post who defends Madea's actions is also quick to condemn Carlos' actions.

They're saying that Carlos' punishment is absolutely wrong yet Madea's is justified. This wouldn't have anything to do with the way the two actions are presented, would it?

On one hand you have the "hero" of the movie dealing out a belt-whipping in a scene that is supposed to be played for laughs. Oh, how hilarious the way the self-righteous Madea whips some sense into a child (and then slaps another on the bus - also supposed to be funny).

Yet when Carlos "the villian" smacks Lisa everyone in the audience takes it as seriously as the movie tells them it should be.

This is part of my point. Don't the lovers of this movie see the quandry here?
If the filmmaker's intent is to show domestic violence as a serious subject then keep it serious. If he wants to play it for humour, fine.

But don't insult my sense of logic and fair-play by suggesting that one person's (Carlos') actions of striking another is a sobering issue whereas a second person's (Madea's) actions of striking a child is humourous.

reply

[deleted]

Hey guys, plain and simple...what you call "beating" in the movie was played for laughs. It was over the top. You see the child was not really hurt. Spankings (not beatings), are a form of discipline. I have to say I'm all for spanking if it is necessary for that particular child. Some kids do well with "time out" and the "naughty chair". Others do not. Both of my brothers and I were spanked as children, after my father sat down and explained to us why we were being spanked, which I have to say was the worst part, because then I felt the shame of doing whatever I had done to disappoint him. I was never at any time "beaten", and I appreciate that my discerning parents understood when it was time for a spanking, for a punishment, or for taking a privilege away. So it's not like black parents just "beat" their kids at any time for any offense. It's a movie. A very over the top movie. So get over it and stop acting like it's reality.

Here's another point. This is going to sound racist, but I guess I can't help it...How many black families do you see on "Supernanny"? We don't play that!!! LOL!

reply

Jas4utoo, thanks for that response. You said everything i was too frustrated and lazy to type.

btw
"Here's another point. This is going to sound racist, but I guess I can't help it...How many black families do you see on "Supernanny"? We don't play that!!! LOL! "

you were'nt the only one thinking that. :-)


"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence." Boondocks

reply

Madea beating Nikki was necessary to turn her into a respectful child, she obviously didn't know any better and the last couple of foster homes that she came from didnt discipline her correctly.

Madea repeatedly hitting a child on a schoolbus for yelling at her was NOT necessary. Furthermore, it would have gotten her arrested and incarcerated for assault, child abuse and various other charges. It would have also gotten her a confrontation from the child's mother when he went home and told her what happened, or when the bus driver or the 20-30 other witnesses told the school/his mother what happened.

BUT, let's not forget people....THIS IS A MOVIE!!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


Kids today are out of control because their parents could care less. (Black or White) NOT because they aren't smacked around.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Kids today are out of control because their parents could care less. (Black or White) NOT because they aren't smacked around.


Good point.

reply

we do seem to be stricken with a generation of lazy parenting

reply

Madea hitting nikki with the belt was funny because those uf us who grew up being raised that way can relate. Its totally a cultural thing. We can laugh at it cuz we remember being little and doin something stupid and getting in trouble for it and thinking our parents were crazy. And then we can look back at those things now and laugh because we know now what we didn't know then which is, all that stuff we did when we were little didn't make any sense. And if we were in our parents place, we would of done the same thing. If you have never been spanked by your parents I'm sure its easy for you to see it as being abusive. Lets not forget that there's many kinds of abuse. Parents who leave their kids in time out all day - that's neglect. Parents who yell and scream all these different things at their kids - verbal/emotional abuse. U really have to look at how extreme something was and the intent before saying something is abusive or not

reply

Many people have used the race issue here by saying that black culture just believes in discipling by spanking or whipping or whatever. I am white and do believe in spanking as one form of punishment. I know many white parents who do spank their children, and many who do not. I have found that those who have never been spanked get into more trouble and are not respectful.

Some cannot understand the difference between spanking a child and beating an adult female. There is a difference. A man and a woman are equals. One should never try to beat an equal to belittle that person. A child, however, is not an adult's equal (and treating one like so has a lot to do with the downfall of many children). I was spanked when I was a child. When I did something wrong, my mother would explain why that was wrong; and when that didn't work, she would spank me. If I ever talked back to her in a disrespectful manner, she would pop my mouth with her hand. The difference I think many people have conveyed is that Madea is not beating or spanking the child for no reason. She has been disrespectful and deserves punishment. A grown woman does not need to be taught how to behave or to be disciplined. When a man beats a woman, it is not out of love...it is because he knows he is inferior and feels the need to make her inferior to him.

As far as discipling a child, let me give you this example. I do have children of my own, but I have had to baby-sit a lot for my aunt. She has a two-year-old son. One day, Caleb went into the computer room. He began pulling out the cords. After I told him that that was bad and wrong and not to do it again, I replaced the cords. I shut the door. Ten minutes later, I caught him doing it again. I went over to him and popped his hand lightly but hard enough to make him stop and cry a little. Was I wrong in doing that? I had tried to vocally discipline him, but it didn't work. Sometimes, force or violence (whatever you want to call it) does work; but not the kind that will cause bruises or welts or any type of bleeding.

reply

Carlos, as Lisa's fiance, is not in a position of authority over her. He leaves bruises.
Madea. as Nikki's foster mother, is in a position of authority over her. She leaves no mark and does no damage.

As for the kid on the bus, You can't really see Madea doing anything to him. Also, she's an old lady, while Carlos is a man in his prime.

Anyway, in an action movie, it's bad when the villain kills the hero's sidekick, but not when the hero kills the villain's henchmen.

reply

Mr.Dog,
Do you hear that sound? It's the reality siren and you're wanted back on this plane of existence.

reply

Mr. Peckinpah,
Are you implying that I shouldn't compare possible double standards in one movie to possible double standards in another movie? If that doesn't seem like a valid point, I did make others.
If that's not what you meant, say what you mean instead of leaving me to guess. I'm not psychic.

reply

my parents never hit me either and i'm also fine, but i was a shy kid that would not seriously question her parents anyway.
but my litle brother has never been shy and sometimes hitting him was just the only way to make him listen.(but if we were home we'd usually prefer to put him in his room till he was calmed down again) now that he's older (7 years) he has learned not to get angry if things don't go his way and rarely has to be punished.(o, and we only started punishing him when it was clear that talking to him was only making matters worse: it gave him a reward (attention) for behaving bad (screaming, getting angry))

parents should always punish their children as little as possible (and give them a load of compliments if they behave well), but i worry about the (pregnant) parents that take much pride in claiming they will never punish their child. such parents often find out (when the child gets 3 or 4 years old) that children just need to be reminded sometimes who is in charge. i think not doing such is basically child-neglect.

reply

So one of the main advantages of having children is that you get to be lord, master, and unquestionable ruler over a less-developed being? If that's the case I'm all for neutering 98% of the species.

reply

[deleted]

exactly

reply

sometimes kids need slams now and then.

reply

oh my god.

"You'd bettah watch yoh step! You just might be cought undah the SpyGlass!"

reply

Hey wildpeckerhead, would passing gas on children constitute abuse?

reply

only if the child's mouth were open...

reply

See, I'm in the Bible belt (jackson, tennessee) and just 20 minutes away is Henderson County, where the schools use paddles as a form of punishment. I don't know if they still do now, but when I was in school I was paddled once and my mother went absolutely balistic. (we're not from Tennessee originally, so she didn't like the idea of anyone paddling me) She went to the school and told them they were never to touch me again. The school couldn't understand why she was so mad, as other parents encouraged it to prevent children from misbehaving. My mother was one of the first parents to state that they needed to offer another form of punishment. In this case, an in school suspension began as a second form of punishment. But years before, a girl was paddled and her mother, so angry that someone did that without her permission, ending up hitting the teacher who did it.

reply

I didn't see a child get a beating. A spanking with a belt on the butt is not a beating and look what all you Sigmund Freud lovers are turning out these days, everything from serial killers to school shootings and suicides. Spankings may not be the answer, but neither are talking and time outs and whatever other BS we're using these days. The kid on the bus got smacked not beaten. The kind of disrespect he showed deserved the result he received. Hitting a woman is a very bad thing. This is not a mixed message. We try to teach our children respect for their elders, consequences for bad actions and hitting women is a no no. This was a good, funny movie. You think this movie sends a bad message then what about movies that glorify drugs and sex and violence. Go pick on the real problem movies not this one because Family Reunion is not the problem. Honestly, if you're not Black, you shouldn't try to critique Black movies because you really cannot understand us. We know what we're supposed to do and we know the difference between right and wrong. We grew up in a very violent America with people who didn't respect us as human beings. We get the message that Tyler Perry is trying to relay. It makes sense to us.

reply

First up, let me say I'm black, and so this 'beating your kids is a black cultural thing' holds very little water with me. Hitting your kids is wrong full stop. It doesn't teach respect, it teaches fear. My mom only ever hit me once, and she regretted doing it ever since. My parents are highly intelligent people, and usually could think up more appropriate punishments than having to resort to beatings... and quite frankly, it worked, I grew up fine, am a reasonably responsible person, with a good job and so far have managed to not kill anyone, and I get along with my parents great. I always feel that if you have reached a stage where by you have to hit a child then you have already failed as a parent, there are very few cases where by a child naturally does something that is so abhorrently wrong they deserve to be hit, and usually there is a medial problem behind that (ADD etc.) which needs to be addressed, and no amount of smacking will sort that out.

If you are a parent and your child needs a beating, I suggest that you give the child up for adoption so it has a chance of a decent, respectful up bringing, don't have any more kids, or, if you do, you might want to sort out your own parenting issues, because you really shouldn't be having them in the first place.

reply

You know as I am reading this, I have to wonder to myself....

How many of you out there actually HAVE kids? Your opinions on a lot of hot topics like these will change when you take that huge step and become a mother/father. I know I changed a ot of my beliefs when I had my first child. And I do believe there is a fine line between abuse and punishment....and let me tell you, sometimes a child deserves a belt to the but. But sometimes other punishments are in line too. Abuse is something that is done in extreme, without regard, often for no reason. Abuse is scary and ful of fear. I know the difference, trust me. When my mother slapped me when I called her a B*tch, I deserved it. I knew I was getting smacked because I was being a little brat. When my boyfriend hit me because he was drunk, THAT was totally different.

Now, I'm not saying that every mother or father should smack someone around--but this issue holds a LOT of grey area. Circumstances hold a lot in this argument.

"You and I have unfinished business."
"Baby, you ain't kidding."

reply

How many of you out there actually HAVE kids?

same here. i don't have kids yet, but from what i've heard a lot of parents who first made a big deal about: 'i am NEVER going to punish, let alone hit, my child, i will work purely with positive reïnforcement', find out after a few years of parenting that their child is not behaving as the 'free, giving back all the respect he gets from his parents to everyone around him, having plenty of self-respect' individual, that they had pictured their child to become(something their own parents 'abuse' had deprived them of becoming themselves), instead they find out their child behaves much better(and looks more happy) after it has been disciplined a few times.

but this issue holds a LOT of grey area.

indeed. generic statemets like: hitting children is always wrong, or:spare the rot, spoil the child are usually not enough, only if one knows the whole situation, can one say wether hitting that child was justified.

reply

I agree Clytamnestra--

I have a little boy, and sometimes I am at the store and he is crying away....I know I HAVE to be at the store to get something we need, so I can't just leave, and it is embarassing at how many people just LOOK at you with this disgusted look. Some people even have the nerve to say to me "Did you pinch him?" or "Make him stop already!!"

ANd I can tell you that is the only time I really want to slap someone. I hate it when people tell me how to raise my child when they do NOT know the whole situation. Maybe my child is sick....maybe he is tired....or maybe he is just being "bad." But I know that I will use creative punishment when my child acts up.

HOWEVER. You cannot. reason. with. a. two. year. old. period. They do not really understand "right" or "wrong" at that stage in their life. You can't say to them, "Yelling at people is wrong" "Touching the stove is a no no" and "Stealing is bad." They just act, and wait for reactions. I have a child I know. I've been to school and taken enough classes to know. So sometimes sitting them in a corner is the right punishment. Sometimes a light smack in the butt when they touch the stove is warrented. How else are they going to know? They don't KNOW they hot stove is bad. But if the touch it, and you try to reason with them, they are going to do it again because they do NOT understand.

However, spanking a 13 year old is ridiculous. They DO understand, and you can come up with other punishments.

Another thing--you can't be your child's parent AND their best friend all of the time. Sometimes you have to be mean, take things away from them and tell them how it is. That doesn't mean abuse....that means being a Mom and a Dad.

"You and I have unfinished business."
"Baby, you ain't kidding."

reply

Nichiko are both ur parents black? That can make a difference. Even if they are, just b/c someone is a certain race that doesn't mean that they follow that culture. I don't think anyone is saying every child has 2 be spanked. There are ppl that didn't get spanked that turned good, there are people who did and they turned out great too.

reply

Why do some black people believe that every other black person has to do things just like them? Every friend I have ever had in my life, we had done some things differently. Even when we were of the same basic culture. It's normal. And even when I heard different black families talking, some were into whipping way more than others.
I think some people do deep down feel like they were abused and so to comfort themselves the say "it's a black thing." I'm not saying everyone who has ever got a spanking can classify themselves as being abused, but there are some parents who whip their kids at the slightest thing they did wrong. And those kids grow up and say "I know your momma was as mean as mine coz you black too!"
Some people overly glorify whippings. I have met real misbehaved kids who got whipped all the time. The parents who get better results in obedience are the ones who focus on the morals they instill in their children orally from an early age.

reply

Many Blacks have adopted the "White" way of raring children. You may have turned out okay but for the majority of us, spankings are in order. My parents spanked me and I retired as a very successful computer geek at the age of 53. I respect my parents, the elderly and have grandchildren who are also respectful. The kid on the bus was someone else’s kid who did not have any respect. Where do you think he was going to end up with that attitude? We can agree to disagree but know both methods have worked i.e., you and me.

Be respectful of Tyler Perry's message and don't bash a movie that isn't bad or trying to be anything but funny with an excellent message of love. Focus on the message rather than the methodologies of raising children. Part of his message is it's really not okay to beat your spouse despite how you raise your kids.

reply

I'm seeing a lot of posts on here about how a woman is being abused. I haven't seen the movie yet and I don't know if I want to. I get really disturbed watching a movie where a woman is beat up by her husband, so I want to ask do you actually see Carlos (I think that's his name) hit Lisa?

Joe Eccles. ---><--- Twistan!!!.

reply

Serial killers have always existed. You should read up on history. School violence was actually worse a hundred years ago then it is today. People like you (based on reading some of your other comments and reviews) seem to believe the fiction of movies in the past as if back then there wasn't a lot of violence. People didn't beat their wives, or kids, or molestation wasn't as huge back then as it is now. It was actually worse back then. In many parts of the US up to not so long ago a husband could beat his wife and children and nothing would happen to him because they were seen as his property (figuratively speaking and some places, literally speaking).

On the issue of spanking kids: all you're teaching them is one of two things (or both):

1. Spanking is a good thing because when someone does something you don't like, you get to hit them.

2. This is how a parent shows you they love you.

That's what is being taught. Spanking isn't a deterrent. Never was, never will be.

-Nam

I am on the road less traveled...

reply