Why'd it bomb in the US?


It's not any worse than any of the other millions of romcoms out there!

reply

Because americans are idiots.

"He had sex with my mamma, WHY?"

reply

[deleted]

good lord - did you really ask this question - i made the mistake of seeing this film last weekend and while i didn't think it would be good - i had no idea it would be unwatchable -

you brits have become increasingly provincial and arrogant - the fact that some uk book publisher paid a huge sum for pegg's memoirs because he appeals to americans is mind boggling - most americans don't even know who simon pegg is - shaun of the dead was a minor cult film over here - hot fuzz bombed big time - and spaced has only shown on bbc america a station that almost no one watches with the exception of expats from that rock you people call a country -

i like pegg myself - but jesus - get a clue and get over yourselves - no one over here gives a crap about your poorly made little films unless it involves old people taking their clothes off and embarrassing themselves with bad dance moves -

I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am.

reply

i liked this movie, & i think Simon Pegg is a funny guy, i don't know why it bombed

reply

ya - it was a bit off the wall - but had an amazing cast, great acting, and funny. not oscar worthy but a good and entertaining watch.

reply

Docudrama67 - there's no need to be like that. It was merely a question. I'm a Brit and I'm not in agreement that 'Americans are idiots', so please don't take the second posters comment as being the view of every British person because it just isn't.

reply

Well "glass houses", it's just not very good. I'm a big fan of Simon Pegg and I was really disappointed. From the corny slapstick stuff to the very unnecessary nudity, it was not funny. I agree with the notion that maybe he's doing a bit of cashing in right now. Whatever the reason, I hope he finds better material in the future.

reply

I have to admit that it was nowhere near as good as I was expecting it to actually be. But I didn't hate it. I think Pegg has enormous talent and to waste it is a shame. I live in hope that 'Star Trek' will be better. I'm mostly looking forward to 'Paul' though. He is always at his best with Nick Frost by his side.

reply

The fact that Young's memoirs are a devastating satire and critique of New York life/society is probably one reason Americans aren't enjoying this film. I loved the audiobook, but parts of it made me uncomfortable--and it was abridged!
I still look forward to seeing the movie.

reply

I didn't feel the book was a devastating satire of New York life/society. I know that's what its billed as but it read more like the hurt finger-pointing by a man who was convinced he was talented and desirable and went to NYC only to recieve a brutal kick in the ego.

It seemed all of his failures are admitted through gritted teeth and the only thing he excels at is pointing out how horrible and pointless rich and successful people are behind closed doors.

Americans may well hate this film because it criticises NYC. Knock yourselves out.

Personally I hate Toby Young because he represents the pudgy, balding, impotent malaise of the British journalistic establishment.

reply

I didn't feel the book was a devastating satire of New York life/society. I know that's what its billed as but it read more like the hurt finger-pointing by a man who was convinced he was talented and desirable and went to NYC only to receive a brutal kick in the ego.

It seemed all of his failures are admitted through gritted teeth and the only thing he excels at is pointing out how horrible and pointless rich and successful people are behind closed doors.


Yeah, or maybe he's right and New York life/society (as well as "society" everywhere) really is just a bunch of privileged, undeserving snotballs who are only there through family money, and maybe many rich and successful people really are horrible and pointless and deserve to have this fact about them pointed out not only behind closed doors but in public as well. But Heaven forbid that somebody talk bad about the "darling" celebrities and wealthy people who fill the pages of the glorious glossy gossip magazines that the general populace devour to make their boring, penniless lives more enjoyable, or disparage the "stars" of the abysmally disgusting and disgraceful reality shows that slime across their flat screen TVs nightly and anaesthetize their brains so they can face another day or drudgery.

You know? Maybe that.

I thought this movie was great - and it's the only thing I've ever liked Kirsten Dunst in and her performance in this has made me realize that she's a pretty good actress and quite nice-looking. She's certainly a better blonde than a redhead.

reply

Simon Pegg was fine, the movie was not. It was a mediocre copy of Devil Wears Prada (or at least it comes off that way).




Free speech

reply

Bsg,

re: "...mediocre copy..."

Hm. You got me thinking. The similarities are definitely very strong. But I felt there was a depth to "Alienate" that "Prada" lacked. Two things I can think of: The writing is genuinely funnier--more acid; I like that--and the themes run deeper--consider the writing around Sydney's dad in "Alienate" vs. the dinner scene between Andy and her dad in "Prada". Also consider the way the leads' love interests are handled. A lot more depth and commitment and profound love in "Alienate", I felt anyway.

So: "Copy", yes. "Mediocre"...? Mmmmm. Not so sure.

reply

I'm pretty sure the movie is based on the book which is a Toby Young piece, not a Simon Pegg one. Or are you kidding/ I'm mistaken?

reply

I didn't like it, an i'm British.
I saw it yesterday, well, i snuck in and saw it yesterday lol.
And everyone was laughing and i was just sitting there, thinking wtf?!


Say it aint so.. I will not go.. Turn the lights off.. Carry me home..

reply

[deleted]

i know it is a toby young piece - but simon pegg is the lead in this movie - and the movie is quite removed from the book from what i understand - the whole rom-com male bridget jones thing wasn't in the book from what i've heard -

the fact is the channel four folks who made this film butchered it the same way hollywood often does - they tried to add a romantic comedy element to a project that shouldn't have had one - the filmmakers never settled on a tone for the movie - and it didn't have a sense of time or place -

the script was a sloppy mess - it was obviously rushed into production and it showed - its not just a bad movie - its darn near unwatchable - and simon pegg agreed to star in it - i don't always blame actors for the whole script but pegg who has shown talent as a writer must have known what a pile of steaming dung this one was and he agreed to do it anyway -

I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am.

reply

Frankly I was shocked when I found out that it was down to only 1 show a day on it's second week at my local theater. Though I don’t consider that an indicator of if a movie is good or bad, only that there was no interest in it (and for that I don’t know why…you tell me Simon Pegg is in it and I’m there no matter what the story is). I went today with a friend and watched it and we we're both laughing hysterically in parts (so were other’s in the theater). True, for Simon’s part it wasn’t his usual kind of comedy, but I’m not going to fault him for trying to branch. And I thought he was just fine in the role.

Also I do agree that the romantic storyline felt a little forced, didn’t really get that part of it from the marketing. I don’t think the film is “un-watchable” as some people here have been saying, though I can see how it wouldn’t be everyone’s cup of tea (British pun not intended).

And I must say, in response to:

“and simon pegg agreed to star in it - i don't always blame actors for the whole script but pegg who has shown talent as a writer must have known what a pile of steaming dung this one was and he agreed to do it anyway”.

You really can’t know sometimes from a script alone. If you could a great deal of movies would never get made. And sometimes it’s not the script, but what gets edited out, or just edited in a weird way, or re-written during the filming (ok…technically I guess you could still call that last one script, but hopefully you get my point). Though I'm not saying that’s the case here necessarily.

reply

That's a tad upsetting because I both loved the book and can find merit in Simon Pegg.

reply

[deleted]

you brits have become increasingly provincial and arrogant

"bbc america a station that almost no one watches with the exception
of expats from that rock you people call a country"

"no one over here gives a crap about your poorly made little films unless
it involves old people taking their clothes off
and embarrassing themselves with bad dance moves"

Nothing provincial or arrogant about those statements then!!!!!!!!!!

reply

My god your a tw@t!

"provincial and arrogant" is what most of the world thinks about the US, no wonder most people east of the Urals cant stand you lot

reply

What publisher paid for pegg's memoirs? If you mean this film it's about Toby Young.

reply

You're a *beep* docudrama

reply

I am sorry, but Americans come up with ridiculous shows sometimes and that is - possibly - why Brits feel so arrogant. Sunset Tan anyone?

reply

But this guy just confirmed that Americans are idiots... WTF Do you overreact like that, it just goes to show that most Americans, like you, think you know best and what you say and like goes... Get a life.

The movie is good, but I'm afraid the humour might just be to much for some people to get... It has no fart jokes and no tits... So basically it will bomb in America.

reply

I love how the statements of one person can confirm that an entire country are idiots. Are you kidding me? The guy got upset because of a really ignorant and simplistic second poster. Now he was obviously upset and reacted badly, but the picture that he painted wasn't too far from the truth, I can truthfully say the majority of people that reside in both places are a bunch of idiots. In fact, I have not lived any place on earth that I didn't dislike the majority of people. That's just kind of the way things go.

As for this movie, there was no excuse for how bad it was. A pretty solid cast that did a good job with what they were given, but both the script and the misleading promotion of this movie were what did it in.

reply

jcsmit,

No tits? Was I hallucinating, then? Gotta stop drinking the hot chocolate here in Taiwan!

If this film gets a lackluster response in the U.S., I think it will be because of marketing issues. I can imagine most folks who go out for romantic comedies being pleasantly surprised by the artful narrative work; something you just don't get all that often in files of this genre marketed in America.

reply

Did you watch the this? No fart jokes or tits? Pretty much all there is, and a prosthetic penis, too. This is nothing but low brow, not that there's anything wrong with that, but let's see this for what it is: a movie for 18 to 25 year olds.


This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

reply



who are you talking to?


reply

You know what i am an Indian and i loved this movie and about it bombing in US as someone before said Americans ARE "IDIOTS" !!!!!!!!

AnnaSophia Robb i love u!!!!!

reply


You amuse me!!

reply

[deleted]

Just goes to show that americans have horrible taste

reply

Here, here!

reply

You (Docudrama67), sir, are a moron.

It bombed because most Americans are like yourself, stupid, slow and arrogant. Most Yanks don't like Brits, full stop.

Also get your facts right about something if you are going to comment upon something; based on Toby Young's memoirs, NOT Simon Pegg's.

reply

"Hot Fuzz" actually did quite well in the US, while "Shaun of the Dead" made No8 on the US box Office listing despite only having something like a 500 screens accolation or something else around that number. Most films in the top 10 that week had over 1,000.

reply

calm down love

reply

Docudrama67 - "You brits". Good work on lumping 58 million people together. Insulting an entire country based on a childish belief that you know everyone there based on a silly stereotype? Bet your mother's proud of you.

stevie77 - When you say "Most Americans" I'm assuming you back this up by having met a large proportion of the population of America. Otherwise you'd be insulting millions of people based solely on what you've heard about the so called 'typical American' on tv and other media. That would of course make you an idiot and I'm sure that couldn't be true.

It's funny that these posts are about a film called 'How to Lose Friends & ALIENATE People'.

reply

docudrama, the film is about Toby Youngs` memoirs, not Simon Peggs! simon pegg is an A-C-T-O-R. The film wan`t great by any means, but it gives you no reason to slag off the britain and its film industry. I don`t know wether you`ve noticed, but the world doesn`t give much of a crap for you americans, either. To quote yourself, jesus - get a clue and get over yourself.


I got it,I got it,I got it...I ain`t got it

reply

the fact that some uk book publisher paid a huge sum for pegg's memoirs because he appeals to americans is mind boggling
Dude, what the hell are you talking about?

Also, wasn't this an American production?

“Friends! Help! A guinea pig tricked me!”

reply

Hot Fuzz bombed? Are you retarded?

It *exceeded* its box office expectations in North America.

reply

I agree w/ "'docudrama""......and I dont care for most British films b/c I cant understand them & need subtitles

reply

Wow, talk about the "arrogant American" stereotype. Thanks for living up to it docudrama67! :)

reply

"you brits have become increasingly provincial and arrogant"

Although the film was below par, this statement sums up just how dumb you seem. You come over as a bit of an idiot. Making the sort of crass generalisations prejudiced idiots make all the time. Educated, intelligent people would shy away from identifying alleged character traits of am entire nation, but then you appear to be neither. If your too stupid to see you're wrong then you are a limited prejudiced tool. Think before you spew out such nonsense.

reply

docudrama67 you sound like you should get over yourself. I am american born and raised and LOVE British TV shows and Movies. My entire family does. We don't have cable so we get our BBC fix via Netflix. and that is 97% of what we watch through it. I thought this movie was good not GREAT no but still really liked it. HUGE fan of Simons.

reply

*beep* you and *beep* your whole disgusting country you clueless, deluded *beep*

reply

stated perfectly on all accounts dd

reply

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahh
americans have taste !!!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaah

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not!

reply

You didn't get it. It's about Hubris (Simon Pegg).

reply

Not all of us are idiots, ya' idiot!

reply

No, just the people who voted for George W. Bush (once or TWICE, same difference) and voted for McCain because of Sarah Palin.

"This are Nice shoes! Couldn't you afford some real Nike?"

reply

Memories said: "No, just the people who voted for George W. Bush (once or TWICE, same difference) and voted for McCain because of Sarah Palin."

Ouch! Touche! Now BACK OFF, woodja?

reply

"Because americans are idiots. "
again a TRUE remark...i already feel "alienate".......so if you wanna waste time....

reply

its better than living in europe...

reply

i need to give your mom's panties back, they are starting to stink up my room.

reply

Why group all Americans and label them as idiots? There is clearly a fine line between a successful Pegg movie and a horrible Pegg movie. This doesn't match Hot Fuzz or Shaun of the Dead at all in a comedic perspective. I think it's because he didn't have as much creative input. I respect Pegg and his ability to make fine films, but I also have the ability to point out a setback such as this. If perhaps your reason for loving it is that it is just a Pegg movie, as he is very British, and the fact that actors from the United Kingdom aren't as prevalent in numbers as the ones from the USA, you are very confused and your judgment is clouded by patriotism and devotion. All in all, if it looks like sh!t and smells like sh!t, it must be sh!t.

reply

Hey, I'm British but the Americans got this movie right - it was bloody awful and almost painful to watch at times. Not in a good way like 'The Office' (UK version) but just in bad, this is embarrassingly crap way

"It's because of movies like this that illegal downloading exists and you can be bored for free..."

reply

Nah, it's just not very funny, interesting or original.

This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

reply

Well first off the movie is just plain terrible. Its painfully predictable and full of cliches. I wanted to see it because Im a huge Simon Pegg fan, and while I wasn't expecting much from this one it was definitely even less than I was anticipating. Kirsten Dunst is easily the worst part of this movie, aside from being a horrible actress I just don't see her as a viable love interest to pegg. Simon Pegg is his usual brilliant self in this, and Jeff Bridges and Gillian Anderson are good as well. As for WHY it failed, I think part of it has to do with the way it was marketed here in the US, because a movie being terrible dosen't stop the general american public from seeing it, and I certainly agree that this was no worse than most of the romcoms that come out.

reply

I thought it was excellent. As for why it bombed, probably because every theater in my area had a maximum of two showings a day. All daytime shows, too. Weird.

When you're pushed, killing's as easy as breathing.

reply

Honestly, the reason why, is because it doesn't have enough A list talent to do super well. Yea Kirsten Dunst is in it, but she's been in so much and some of the things are bad, so although she does have a following, she's not going to draw in a large enough audience to do this #1. Megan Fox is known, and known as hot, but again is new to the screen and her claim is Transformers, I don't think her career is big enough standing on its own (without transformers) to draw enough people in. Simon Pegg hasn't been in that much, and Jeff Bridges, although a good actor is not well known enough to the Average American Joe. Same goes with Gillan Anderson.

**Vote OBAMA '08. Register Easily at Votepoke.com**

reply

Awaremeout,

Yr observation re Dunst and Fox is interesting.

I think you're right: It sheds light on star marketing; which is ironically what the movie is about.

But your post triggers a reflection on the issue of Dunst vs. Fox.

There's a funny thing there: Dunst has the established star moxie, yet I got the feeling watching this that Fox showcased mature acting chops in a way that I wonder if Dunst could ever muster.

Anyway: Thanks for your post.

reply

I was planning on seeing it but I wasn't even aware it was in theaters yet. So, you might as well add $10 to the box office totals.


This is not my signature. I manually type this for every post I do.

reply

[deleted]

"The Brits don't seem to do well as leading actors in the US."

I think that's the main answer to why it didn't do so well. I saw the film a couple of days ago and I found it very funny (in spite of the fact that someone had asked for the subtitles, which was a bit distracting).
Another thing is that there is a gulf between the UK and US in terms of humour. We Brits tend to enjoy the "homo-humour" that was fairly evident in the scenes with the transsexual character but I get the feeling that this is not to American tastes.
The last thing I want to point to is the fact that Pegg's character was regularly referring to the British view on journalists (in particular those who go after celebrities) and the fact that it is different in the US. Whilst I believe that this is true (with the possible exception of the National Enquirer), I am not sure that Americans realise this and so when it is referenced half of what is said probably made no sense to them.

Basically, this was a film that will appeal heavily to Brits and most of Pegg's fans in the US, but as he's not in the same league as the rest of Hollywood that's not enough to pull a big crowd to see his films in America.

reply

Yeah, Vanity Fair has a ton of readers but I'm not sure if a mass audience was ever going to care about Graydon Carter. And while The Devil Wears Prada did pretty good, how many teenagers are going to flock to a movie about the New York media world (particularly one that stars Simon Pegg rather than Anne Hathway?)

I actually liked the book (sue me.) I thought it was witty and funny and perceptive. What the film did was dumb it down enough to take the charm out of the material while at the same time failing to make it accessible to everyone else.

reply

My husband and I really wanted to see this movie as fans of Simon's other work, but it's not playing near us. We had the same problem with Ghost Town.

reply

A few other reasons ...

1) It opened on an unusually busy date in the US, with about 10 wide releases, plus Rachel Getting Married playing to capacity crowds in New York and LA. A lot of films underperformed that weekend. Except for that damn chihuahua movie.

2) MGM ain't what it used to be, and I would suspect a lot of their promotion resources are going toward Bond right now.

3) Pegg just hasn't broken through here yet. There's a huge gap between British film success and US success right now.

reply

I think it played one week at my local cineplex. I had planned to see it this week, but it was gone and replaced by something I care nothing about. I live in the U.S., but I am a Simon Pegg fan. In fact, there's a lot of us here who are Simon Pegg fans.

As for the question of which country, which country's movies, or which country's people are best and which one sucks, if you can't see merits and flaws for both the USA and the UK, maybe you need to work on overcoming your prejudices. Sweeping general terms applied to all things U.S. or all things U.K. merely emphasizes one's unreasonable, and unreasoning, point of view.

--Preston Allison

reply

i want to see this movie but its not playing anywhere! :(

DVD SCANS:
http://www.freewebs.com/dvdscans

reply

What I don't get is how Beverly Hills Chihuahua took #1 at the U.S. box office the weekend How to Lose Friends & Alienate People was released. It's beyond me.

reply

When people say they want to see the film but can't, I suspect there are those who want the film to do as badly as it possibly can, and know how to facilitate that end. This may not wholly disadvantage those involved with the film, as they may come to notice merely because the film is taking so remarkably little money eg. I hadn't heard of Megan Fox before.

reply

Because Beverly Hills Chihuahua is a family film with a much larger audience than How to Lose Friends. Also, the marketing for Chihuahua's blew away Friends. I never even heard of How to Lose Friends until today. I loved Shaun of The Dead but didn't care for the other two movies Pegg put out. Like many other actors I'm sure Pegg is going to grab almost any project he can to get his name out in the mainstream and rake in as much cash as he can.

reply

Wow, some people are really prone to hyperbole on IMDb.

This film is nowhere near as bad as some like to make out it is. Just one glance at the film's rating by users shows that it was pretty well thought of.

It's not a great film, and it is far from a classic romcom. But it is reasonably solid and does have some laugh-out-loud moments. I certainly wouldn't walk away from the cinema feeling robbed.

Kudos to Simon Pegg for carrying the movie. Didn't think he had it in him.

reply

Well, after having watched "Spaced","Shaun of the Dead","Hot Fuzz" and "Run Fatboy Run" about 30 times or more each and "Big Nothing" another 3-4 since the beginning of September, I can now safely say, A) I've never been more of a nerd about anything and B) I have complete trust in Simon Pegg. He knows his stuff and he knows what he chooses to be in. Hasn't failed me yet.

This movie just proved it. Along with "Big Nothing". They were both great in their own way even thought he did not write them. He's an excellent writer and actor and I can't wait for anything that he participates in. Especially the third Wright/Frost movie.

I agree that this was not a laugh-every-5-seconds movie like what he usually does, but it was a nice, funny and romantic comedy with a great cast.

Definitely worth a visit to the theater and the price of a ticket.

http://orion21.blogspot.com
http://myanimelist.net/animelist/Orion21

reply

1) Americans are closed minded and stupid. Hence they don't understand British humor.
2) People don't understand subtle humor.
3) People are stupid.

reply

a pig pissing against some guys leg isn't subtle humour
simon peg dancing like a complete retard isn't subtle humour
a dog being smashed by a giant rock isn't subtle humour
simon peg getting trown out of a-list parties isn't subtle humour
making an alarm go of by opening the emergency exit = not humour at all
fumbling on everything you do, picking up a bag, opening a window, closing the shades ISNT SUBTLE HUMOUR

people who like this piece of tripe obviously have no idea what good humour is
don't even try to pass this off as an example of British Humor, it's offensive to real British funnymen.

reply

I'm sorry.. I thought the purpose of humor was to make people laugh... Not just exist and be pretty. A lot of people find this movie funny and a lot of people find Simon Pegg funny, which is why he's succeeded so well. So, if a whole lot of people laugh and have fun with this, how does that make this kind of humor bad and your kind of humor, whatever that is, good?

Humor is a matter of taste. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it bad and just because we do, doesn't make it good. It's entirely personal. There's no good and bad humor, but there is successful and not successful. Apparently, this kind of humor sells and some happen to like it.

Jim Carrey's let's-act-like-we're-being-electrocuted all the time humor also sells and I personally dislike it safe for very few of the movies he's done.

http://orion21.blogspot.com
http://myanimelist.net/animelist/Orion21

reply

"A lot of people find this movie funny and a lot of people find Simon Pegg funny"

a lot of people thought Hitler was a pretty swell guy too, that doesn't mean he was

"There's no good and bad humor, but there is successful and not successful."

if you really believe that, you're hopeless

reply

Well, the moment Pegg starts killing people, he'll have lost my respect then.

And glad to be hopeless if the alternative is someone like you.

http://orion21.blogspot.com
http://myanimelist.net/animelist/Orion21

reply


Hey flyingdog1, fair point about those select examples, but perhaps they were trying to include a more expansive, and by that I mean unsophisticated and unsubtle humour in a vain attempt to corner all at the comedy stakes, and in some ways failed somewhat. That said, I found it notonly watcheable, but at times a good laugh. It played like a not so squeaky clean tongue in cheek Deavil Wears Prada, which in fact was the entire point of the parody. Now I have not read the book, but you need to take it as it is, and not compare, although comparison is inevitable.

Maybe it;'s just the subject matter and seting that is already so artificial and ripe for satire as to be a living joke, which Hollywood is undoubtedly, the place where plastic is God, whether it's physical enhancements, licences to spend or emotionless so called acting. That is the disgrace. Of course I can admit that this negative generalization is not true of all Hollywood, which is the one failing of generalization, in that it will make whoever uses it look like a complete halfwit

Compare this to Hot Fuzz which I think was pure genius, every reference exploded of the screen, and I rank it as one of the best films I've ever seen. But call it tripe if you want to, it's your opinion.

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
By the power of truth I, while living, have conquered the universe

reply