9/11 truthers = retarded

This must be the original source of all the retarded "evidence" that there is a conspiracy behind 9/11.

This moron starts off with the crap about the pentagon. He says there is no plane debris by showing us ONE picture of the site. There are plenty of other pictures showing debris. He then shows a computer animation of the crash and uses THAT as evidence that the crash didn't happen that way. ITS A COMPUTER ANIMATION NOT LIVE FOOTAGE RETARD!!! Then uses his little pissy voice to mock people who demand an explanation of what he thinks did happen to flight 77 and simply says that he doesn't know. From here we shift to the crashes in NY and the ONLY evidence this guy can come up with is about 20 people on the news running around in a panic after the crashes saying they heard explosions. These people are in a panic and two planes just crashed of course they are hearing explosions. Let me back up here now. This is virtually the only "evidence" this idiot has in regards to there being bombs in the other buildings, yet he completely ignores the hundreds of eye witness accounts who saw flight 77 crash into the pentagon and even some who said it was "a very large passenger jet" and that it had an American Airlines logo on it.

Then there's the "flash". You take extremely blurred images of something GRAY crashing into something else that is GRAY and claim to me that the flash "clearly" occurs before impact? At the rate you have it slowed down to it literally can not occur more than a quarter of a second before impact AND it is at the exact same time for both planes. The flash is a result of A PLANE CRASHING INTO A FREAKING BUILDING!!!

Oh then there's the little clip of the lady saying "not American Airlines". First off how could she tell from miles away like they were? She's obviously stating an opinion which proves nothing. Second of all, anyone claiming you doctored the sound can still claim it perfectly. Just because you show me half a second of some lady moving her mouth is no proof that she is the one saying what i'm hearing. But that is beside the point anyway.

Then there's the Bush quote about seeing the plane crash into the first tower. First of all he was asked the question years after it happened and obviously by then HAD SEEN THE FOOTAGE OF THE PLANE CRASHING INTO THE FIRST TOWER MILLIONS OF TIMES JUST LIKE THE REST OF US!!! Second of all, he no doubt did see footage of the second plane crashing over and over again that day and - to use Mr. Retard host's method of questioning - Is it not possible that he got the exact image of what he saw on the television at that exact moment mixed up with all the other coverage that we all saw over and over again for days afterwards? Hell I don't even remember the first exact footage I saw of the crashes. There's even another possible explanation that by saying he saw the first plane crash he meant he saw NOT the MOMENT OF IMPACT but the smoke coming out of the building as a result of the first crash. Take whichever you like, they are both far more likely to me than the explanation of George Bush and the DoD decided to kill thousands of Americans for who the hell knows why.

Then his whole defense about no political agenda, Bush hater crap. I don't know anyone who thinks that. For the most part we all just think you are insane and/or retarded.

Finally, there is no clear explanation by this terd of what the exact agenda was of the government if any of this crap is true. He says some junk about Bush just wanting to make friends with all big countries like China and control us through Wal Mart or whatever. But if that's true then why go to Iraq and why stay there so long? That is possibly the least populat thing that he could have done and the world hates him for it. So... don't you think he might have just said, gee this isn't worth it and pulled the troops?

"Either way its baby stew, which is bad."