I was reading about the movie Poltergeist and this movie came up stating that it was one of the second movies to use a real corpse. Is this true? I watched this movie when it came out and I have to admit, it did look pretty convincing but that's rather creepy if the bodies were real. I'd hate to be starring in this movie.
shareit says that they used real bodies, in imdb tagline but i am not sure either.
shareI watched this movie last night and I swear it's rubber. i think the whole thing harks back to the old black and white b movies (and slasher movies of the 70's...Texas Chainsaw Massacre being an example)..where claiming things to be real is just a tagline to draw the crowds in. To be honest it didn't work on me as i hadn't even heard of this movie until I saw it.
shareI wonder why it's not listed in the FAQ section. does nobody really know? Where the heck is the props guy when you need him?
If you are Anti-American: Admit you are doing it just to be cool. Does it feel good to hate?
The bones used in the first Poltergeist movie were in fact real, and I believe the actors did not know it during the filming of the movie. I have no idea why this movie was allowed to lie for its tagline; it seems like false advertising or something like that to me. The bodies didn't look real in Unrest, either... They were simply too "juicy" inside-I have never seen such inflated internal organs in a corpse before.
"I like my coffee black, just like my metal"
If true that's awesome!
share
Yes its from some third world country that has a strangle hold on the
Renta Corpse bussniess
the relatives lead decent lives off the dead ones till north americans banned the practice of paid skelton shows ,
hey now you gotta have some of your skin on like that show "the bodies"
givemebackthelast1136.789wastedsecondsofmylife----Ididnotneedtoseethat,Ivotethumbsupthismovie!
They used the same dead bodys
share