awful


Did anyone else think it was highly implausible that a person would "go for coffee" with a stranger, after the harassing incident with a different stranger?

And then, the conversation that ensued afterwards about her family's "weirdness" was just pathetic, lame, and the absolute worst of "independent film" cliches... who the f** cares about this movie.

It tried to be clever and different, but was just lame and uninspired.

reply

[deleted]

It's hard to figure out why an implausible element of a plot line and some weirdness in their families would cause so much venom in a comment. So what if you didn't like it.

I watched it because it had Lorraine Pilkington and Finlay Robertson in it. Lorraine was also in Monarch of the Glen and Finlay Robertson was in a version of Persuasion.

I enjoyed it. It kept my attention because I was waiting to see what would happen next. I laughed several times throughout. I thought it was fairly clever at several points and the leads did a good job.

reply

This movie invoked a lot of passion in me, against it--cuz I'm so sick of these indie movie CLICHES! = Super-"weird" family background for no reason other than to be "Quirky", a meandering storyline that seems to just be an excuse to show a big artsy city off... It's like the screenwriter spent some time walking around London, and thought: "Wow, someone should do a movie about someone in London." And that's all he could think of....

THAT's why. It's so overdone.

Try something new!

reply

"THAT's why. It's so overdone."

No, that's not it, try again.

reply

I honestly thought she was on the verge of a "just kidding!" as her brother just got weirder and weirder.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah that part was a bit strange. I deleted a bit of that dialogue on the file version I watch.

reply