MovieChat Forums > The Good German (2007) Discussion > Is Cate a Nazi in the film??

Is Cate a Nazi in the film??


I know that her charecter is a German. But is she a Nazi? I hope her charecter is. I'm sick of these political correct World War II German charecters. Make them how they really were.

reply

Most of the Germans were not nazis during World War 2. it's insulting to them to say otherwise

reply

How could you say they were not. Don't you pay attetion to history. Germany was a superpower and build its military into a war machine. The elected Adolph Hitler its leader. Massacerd the Jewish race through out Europe. Conquered Europe. And how did they do that support from its people. So how could you tell me that World War II Germans were not Nazi's. Haven't you seen pictures or videos of rallys they held with thousands of people doing heil hitler. And your going to tell me they weren't Nazi's.

reply

I can tell you, not all german were Nazis. Thats not true. We had here also an resistance. What about the "Weisse Rose"?
Don't forget one important truth: every politician ist lying. Hitler lied about many things, this little bastard used the germans.
Its the same cliche as:

All the citizens of the south of the United States hates afro-americans till today.

Be faire!

reply

[deleted]

The White Rose was an exception rather than a rule.

How could the German people who were so unknowing, so innocent let one man do this to so many people?

In many documentaries I've watched, one or two Nazis were able to come to towns on mailbikes and round up all the Jews because their German neighbours had suddenly turned on them.

reply

Do you know the book the wave? It could happen so quick...

reply

No one ever answered my question?

reply

I'll answer your question Swepisode123456: In the book The Good German by Jospeh Kanon Cate's charachter Lena Brandt is a german but not a nazi actually the topic of the story is that Jake Geismar is triying to find out what hapened to her 'cause she was missing probably 'cause the fact that she was not a Hitler follower, but about the movie, I don't know I think is probably just as in the book, but who knows? they're going to change the story a bit at least Tobey Maguire's characther Lt. Patrick Tully is going to be the soilder who is asigned to drive Jake arround, but in the book that soilder's name is Ron and Tully gets killed in the first chapter so like I said who knows? but the book is really really great!!


There you go!!!

reply

Ah, but she still had her part in assisting the nazis. There's a lot of grey area with Lena, I don't think you can just say "no, she wasn't." She 'survived.'

reply

[deleted]

spoken like a true american hero.

reply

[deleted]

No it's more like today..

"All Muslims hate Americans for our Freedoms..."

reply

Gosar: Please do not attempt to assuage your guilt over your nation's nazi past by attempting to equate the race issue in the US south with what happened in Germany and Europe between 1933 and 1945. Why even mention southern racism? Are you trying to say, well the nazis were OK, because blacks were treated badly inthe southern United States?

I for one am becoming very sick and tired of this current attempt by young Germans to re-write history. No one is blaming the present generation of Germans for what happened, that would be as absurd as attempting to blame all Americans alive today for what happened in th south before 1865.

However, the fact of nazism and the enormous popularity it enjoyed among ordinary German people cannot be denied. Hitler was a hero to almost all Germans, and although there were some who resisted out of conscience these were very few indeed. Most Germans were enthralled by Hitler's vision of a widespread German empire, living room and Germany's place in the sun.

Naturally, there was widespread resistance among the conquered nations of Europe, but not within Germany itself,and these increasingly frequent attempts to deny the popularity of and loyalty to nazism and Hitler of the vast majority of the German people only serves to make the rest of us more determined to maintain the truth.

You would do better to accept your past, without attempting to justify it by spurious comparisons with wrongs perpetrated by other nations.

You know how it goes: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance. It is high time for the acceptance phase. Then move on!!

reply

I for one am becoming very sick and tired of this current attempt by young Germans to re-write history.

And I'm becoming sick of you claiming false things. Gosar didn't try to "rewrite" history.

Resistance in Nazi-Germany did exist. Not very much and not very strong, but it did exist. Even if you don't want to hear it.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widerstand_gegen_den_Nationalsozialismus
Zum Beispiel http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wei%C3%9Fe_Rose
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisauer_Kreis

Hitler lied about many things, this little bastard used the germans.

This sentence from Gosar ist true. Better: Hitler misused the Germans. Like Stalin misused the people of Russia and Warshaw Pact, like Castro misused the Cubans or like Mahmud Ahmadinedschad misuses the Iranian people.
Hitler praised and presented himself as the new Messiah for the Erlösungsideologie of the "Tausendjähriges Reich" - which of course was a sick and dirty plan from him.

And befory you start ranting again: No, I did not say "that the Germans weren't Nazis".


reply

We Americans have long been misled into thinking that our society is propaganda free, and that we have a free press and that we are the only ones not befuddled by political bs. Well, it's not true. We've been hoodwinked for at least many decades if not since the Revolution.
We were tricked falsely into both WW I and WW II, and then ever since. We're being screwed by those in control right now. Those puppets on display pretending to be our elected leaders are there for show. Those in control make all the important decisions. They've learned that they can maintain easier and better control if they pretend to let us think that we are making the decisions. Our last election was a circus. Everyone was whipped into a frenzy and strongly polarized. The last few elections have been similar. They use the media to keep us distracted and to make us maleable to their will.
We're all duped!

reply

Tricked into WWII? It would've been hard to stay neutral after Pearl Harbor . . .

reply

[deleted]

Its ignorance to say so.

------------------------------------------
I have a feeling that you're way off on this.

reply

[deleted]

In the last free election (German federal election of November 1932) the NSDAP won 33,1% of popular vote (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_election%2C_November_1932). While it's true that most Germans either approved of their policies (especially in light of initial successes) or offered little resistance when they didn't, one can not conclude that all of them were ardent nazis.

It might be a bit boring though to let Cate play a regular German riding on the bandwagon.

reply

Things are a lot more morally ambiguous in the book than what people are saying in this thread. Most of the German characters in the book were not Nazis, but offered little active resistance out of fear. One of the things the book looks at is that one is faced with moral dilemmas when unable to actively resist an evil regime of which one is terrified.

So, to reinforce what the earlier poster said, in the book, Cate's character is not a Nazi. However, there is at least one (depending on your point of view) sympathetic character in the book who worked for the Nazis. Basically, if you don't like moral ambiguity, this isn't your kind of story.

reply

[deleted]

Hitler didnt get Elected by the Germans .. he Lost the Elections by 20% .. but the Winner didnt have any Seats in the German Parilment and couldnt form a with Help of a Re-Election and a few Higher People Hitler got into office.. when he got into Office he SAVED Germany , He Built the Autobahns .. Which to this date is a Major Part of Germany .. he had almost 0% Unemployment , He Hosted the Olympics , he gave Car Makers in Germany a way to make cars for Under 1000 Mark (back in 1933) .. then his Head went Screwy and he had Conspiracy Theories about Jews .. and how a Jew was going to kill him .. so he thought the best thing to do was to Kill all the Jews So he wouldn't Die

.. Please Research or go to School to Learn about History before you go and Tell everyone that everyone in Germany is a Nazi . ive stayed in germany for 6 months and it was the best place in the world i have ever been

reply

Hey guys - a GERMAN is writing ;o)

Most of this dialogues are stamped of prejudice.
Its the same like "Americans are stupid and not interested whats hapend in the rest of the world - because they are living in their own world - the US."

Please read some books about the time 75 years ago AND today.

and please answer me a question: How muc do you know about the GDR the "German Democratic Republik" ?! Have you ever heared about?
It was the eastern part of germany after WWII - the "communist part" of germany. Have you heard abou the STASI? about the victims of STASI - whats happend in the GDR?
Why eastern people don't made anything about a country like that - because they are all agree with the goverment? No - they just want live in peace -day by day without problems in her jobs or with the goverment.

I agree - parts of germans are Nazis - until today.
But don't you have a CluCluxClan in the US?
Whats about the indians "the americans killed"?
Whats about the slaves americans had?

Remember - WWII was an other kind of time, too. No radio (or (in germany) Nazi radio) NO Television an censored movies.
If the US just hear great news in the radio about the Irak, how powerfull the soldiers are, how successfull the war is going on - without any critic in TV, radio or Movies AND if you get really trouble with your govrment if you say anything against that - you don't have just the idea that it can be th wrong way.
I'm born in '66 - my mother 1931 - she was a child - do you really think she was a Nazi?
My Grandma puts breat and sausages in ruins of houses for the freign soldiers because she thought: If I do this here - maybe a mother in russia do same for my son.
Do you thing she was a nazi? And pray that "Jews are bad" ?!?? - come on...

It was an other time - and THANKS GOD !!! I was born 66 - when that *beep* was over.

reply

Hucke: and here we go again -

If you are trying to justify what happened in Germany between 1933 and 1945 - don't bother, you can't!!

No amount of sqawking about the KKK, the American indians, the slaves, makes what the German people did under Hitler and the nazis any less despicable.

Suck it up - live with it and perhaps you'll live it down. The more you persist in this dreadful self-justification, the more people will remember what you did, because that is exactly the same attitude that was prevalent in Germany and among Germans throughout the nazi era.

reply

And please don't just get your facts right, but your people too. Hitler didn't go all screwy, he was like that from the beginning. Ever heard of Mein Kampf? He was a genius leader who had immesurable power and immersurable evil within him. He is not black and white and neither is the entire Nazi phenomenom. And please, this is coming from a German Jew and German Lutheran descendant.

Everyone's arguments on this entire thread are ridiculous and incredibly narrow. Please take time to think before you postas this is a very sensitive topic.

reply

The first "Autobahn" was build long before Hitler became "Reichskanzler".
And for that, the "Autobahn" he "build" (not actually him ;-) )was not for the people. It was build as a road for tanks and other military stuff.

And please, before you say that someone should "Research or go to School to Learn about History", please note :

"then his Head went Screwy and he had Conspiracy Theories about Jews ..."

then ? then ? Dude, do you knwo when "Mein Kampf" was written ? When he was imprisoned. LOOOOOONG before he became the dictator we all know. And that was looooong before he build the "Autobahn" and hostet the olympics (just to show the world how superior the arian race is. Thanks to Jesse Owens to prove him wrong)


But with one comment you are right. Germany -IS- the best place in the world, as far as i can say. I live here, and i've been to the US, UK, Scandinavia, most neighbour states of Germany (France, Benelux, Austria,...)
All very nice places, i luv your places too, but nothing to compare with my beloved fatherland.

reply

Yup, Hitler disliked Jews way before he was even imprisoned. The man was a gifted orater who talked himself out of a heavier sentence after the uprising. If I'm not wrong, as a child- he lost his mother. The doc was Jewish I believe.

Not only that, when he went to Vienna to draw. He couldn't get in and lived on the streets I think- he was stronger in drawing buildings and landscapes than people. He blamed the Jews for his failure. In fact, they just had a large number of Jews residing there.

Did you know Hitler used to enjoy keeping bees? Ironically, he had Jewish blood.

life is full of censorship.i can't spit in your eye. -katharine hepburn

reply

No, Hitler was NOT Jewish. That's a popular piece of anti-Hitler propaganda that began circulating after he took power, and then again at the end of WWII. However, such was not the case. Or, at least, it's highly improbable. And Hitler was about 18-ish when his mother died of breast cancer; I do not know the doctor's heritage, Jewish or Gentile, but I'm pretty sure the doctor-is-Jewish story is false, or at least a great exaggeration of events to suit a Post-WWII world in need of answers for Hitler's heinous actions.

But you are right about Vienna - as a young Austrian, Hitler fell into antisemitism, or at least heightened his existing antisemitism, while in Vienna. Vienna, at the time, was a literal hotbed of Anti-Jewish sentiments, and Hitler became influenced by several antisemitic groups there (Ostara), as well being introduced to Martin Luther's works (such as "On the Jews and their Lies"). He also took inspiration from the composer Richard Wagner and Lanz Liebenfels to form his ideology on the "perfection" of the Aryan race, and that the Jewish people were behind all of Germany's woes and ills, particularly after the "stab in the back" of WWI.

reply

Her character in the film was a 'Nazi Collaborator', which was (then and now) historically seen as just as bad. When Nazi hunting began after the war, many of the collaborators as well as incidental associates were cornered, questioned and even captured for the intent of getting closer to Gestapo, SS, and other Party members.

The only real gray area that ever existed was in the Luftwaffe. This was only partially dramatically explored in the opening scenes of 'The Great Escape'. Note the German Warden's attitude toward the SS throughout.

Check out your local library, it's all there.

reply

[deleted]

Whoah, that's a whole lot of crap you're writing. You should better keep your mouth shut on historic issues. You sound like a terrible apologetic freak, if not something worse.

reply

By the same logic, how can Americans be so ignorant of genocide that US government is commiting today, under the excuse of "war against terrorism", when in truth, all they want is more oil.

Throw the first stone, etc.

reply

From what I understand Germany was a very angry nation prior to WWII. The Treaty Of Versaille ordered that Germany pay for the expenses of WWI and as such the populus suffered. Hitler came along and presented himself as a saviour. It was only after he gained power that his true intentions became known.

I am not sure of what I say above as it has been a while since I studied History. However, I know this much: the poster who originally made the statement basically calling all Germans Nazis is an ignorant fool. In a sense, he possesses the same dangerous habit of stereotyping which led to the hollocaust.

reply

I'd just like to add that it behoves every responsible citizen living in free and democratic nations to learn about the rise of Hitler and the Third Reich.(From my high school history class the names of authors Schiller and Bullock come to mind, but hey, that was thirty years ago so maybe my memory is fading).

Don't be smug and think 'it could never happen here'? It can and it will if you aren't careful. Anyone who has studied western history over the past 200 years will realise that here, in 2006, many of us aren't living in quite as democratic, open or free societies as we once were. Some historians argue, for example, that in the US since the end of the 19th century, democracy has bit by bit, often in times of war and other national emergencies, been eroded in a way that would have appalled the founding fathers of that once great democracy.

Not all Germans were (or are) nazis - but a minority was able to seize power and force the population through fear (of among other things an imagined enemy - Zionism), and false notions of patriotism and national identity, to be driven along by their regime. There are parallels in the here and now.

BTW - the nazis didn't conquer all of Europe - just to fly the flag of dear old Blighty. And before you ask - yes, we in here dear old Blighty will be eternally grateful for the sacrifices made by our American cousins in helping rid the world of nazism. Thank you.

reply

I hesitate to weigh in here, more heat than light etc, but the fact is that most Germans were more-or-less enthusiastic supporters of Hitler and the Nazis throughout the 1930's. If you actually read some of the history (Bullock, Shirer) this is pretty clear. Informed estimates suggest that had Hitler actually allowed elections in the late 30's he would have won handily.

Don't forget, the worst excesses happened out of view of most Germans, who preferred to concentrate on the theatrical elements of the Nazi regime, folk art, street parades and theatre, the very entertaining movies churned out by UFA, the economic resurgence and the whole "feeling good about ourselves as a nation" thing, after the disasters of WW1 and the hyperinflation.

Of course one day after the fall of Berlin there were no ex-Nazis to be found anywhere; only recently have people started to be a little more honest about how much they enjoyed the great national adventure before it all went sour.

That's the lesson we need to learn, in my view. Nazism, for the majority, wasn't a matter of a jackboot stomping on a human face, it was a feelgood experience. People's ability to be conned by their leaders (and by themselves) remains undiminished, as we have seen elsewhere since 2001.


I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.

reply

Krust: I'm afraid I don't agree with your statement that just lately people have started to be a bit more honest about the support HItler reeived from the average German. In fact, judging by many of these posters, and also what I have heard personally from young Germans, they are becoming very aggressive about their past, and refusing to admit that the German nation was in any way at fault. To hear them tell it, the Germans rose up heroically to resist Hitler, while at the same time being too afraid not to agree with is views, and in any case, American had slaves and the KKK, which makes them just as bad.

I'm afraid there are very disquieting echoes in this attitude of the very same mind set which enabled the nazi phenomenon to arise in the first place. A blind refusal to admit fault, and aggressive attempts to shift blame elsewhere.

reply

I hesitate to weigh in here, more heat than light etc, but the fact is that most Germans were more-or-less enthusiastic supporters of Hitler and the Nazis throughout the 1930's. If you actually read some of the history (Bullock, Shirer) this is pretty clear. Informed estimates suggest that had Hitler actually allowed elections in the late 30's he would have won handily.

mmmh. I wonder why. When all the opponents of the Nazis (communists, social democrats, unionists, Christian conservatives, liberals and monarchists) could campaign so easily while they were in concentration camps or had a ban on speaking.
btw: In 2002 Saddam Hussein was elected by ~100% of the people to stay in power. You see, the Iraqi weren't liberated they were robbed of their beloved leader.

---------------------------
Hello? Hello? Anybody home?

reply

"Not all Germans were (or are) nazis - but a minority was able to seize power and force the population through fear (of among other things an imagined enemy - Zionism), and false notions of patriotism and national identity, to be driven along by their regime."

The above is is a bit misleading. Most Germans may not have been NAZIs but most wholeheartedly supported the NAZIs as long as things were going well -- up to and including their highwater mark, when they had taken most of Europe by force.

reply

plugpray" And ain't that the truth!!!

reply

Well said.

It sounds like this person got his history from a comic book. I would actually bet that he/she has never been out of the USA and they have only thought of foreigners as dumb because they don't speak English.

"Think of something witty and assume that I said it"

reply

To answer the original question, in the film isn't her character Jewish? so unlikely to be a Nazi.

~psychos don't explode in the sunlight, I don't care HOW psycho they are~

reply

She is a German Jew but didn't get put in a concentration camp coz she was married to an SS officer. But toward the end of the war even that didn't help her. She had to turn in 12 other Jews to survive. I don't know if being married to a Nazi makes her one. Probably not since they wouldn't allow Jews. I would call her a collaborator.

Oh sweet mystery of life at last I have found yuuuuuu

reply

In the book, this part of Cate's character is an entirely different person. While not a Nazi, she collaborated to save her skin. Afterward, she's full of remorse.

The book is all about the moral ambiguity resulting from acting out of fear, and people's attempts to redeem themselves later. It's also a love story and a riveting mystery about a time of chaos, deprivation, revenge, distrust. This movie loses sight of the story. What's left is a pointless, washed-out borefest.

reply

This thread really missed the point of the question until the last two posts.

As stated there, she was a german Jew who shopped in 12 jews amongst other things in order to survive.

The moral ambuigity of that is the major part of the film for the viewer.

Her defence mechanism for her remorse is that "...I SURVIVED".

Theres a lot of depth to explore in that statement. Its an ugly concept to take on face to face. But this film does it. Consider that this was a time (ww2) when so many people had to resort to huge moral compromises in order to survive. Be it jewish women prostituting themselves to Nazis, jewish men becoming informants, etc etc. Below a somewhat sanitized version of history is a multitude of personal stories from every gender, nation and creed involved in horrendous circumstances and decisions.

As for taking a moral judgement, fine. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but it should be done with absolute knowledge that to judge them for their actions and suggest they did otherwise, is to sentence them to death. That should be contemplated on a personal level before readily levying it out to others.

".....She Survived". Think about it.

Theres a great bit of dialogue about handling the hugely destructive weight of conscience that comes with this territory. Bit vague on the detail but the crux of it is

The story of the bus driver who is driving a bus rigged up to fill a chamber with exhaust fumes to poison the jewish detainees. To deal with that, he considered himself to be just driving a bus.

This film deals with difficult and sensitive human history and issues. In the case of larrysyr's post, i agree that it could of been done more evocatively. Its flawed in its subtlety. But i would not consider it to be a washed out bore fest. Its refreshing to see such a peice of work coming out of Hollywood.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

If you support the Bush administration, are responsible for the killing of innocent Irakis??

reply

[deleted]

I understood that Lena was actually Jewish, and that she was married to an SS Officer so was therefore exempt from the Jewish laws of the time.

But something has been bothering Clooney's character, and he asks, he having managed to obtain the exit papers she needs, and as they are about to leave Germany together, how she managed to survive, because her husband did not obtain his position until 1943 rendering her exempt from the jewish laws, when almost all jews had already been deported or sent to one of the camps. And she confesses to him that she offered her services as a spy, seeking out the few jews left in Berlin and turning them in and she says she found 12.

Did anyone else think she was rather sneering about how the last few jews took tremendous chances just to go to a restaurant or just to go out and about? But I wondered two things - one was how would such jews have the money and means to eat at expensive restaurants by 1943, and also, if she could spot that they were jews, surely anyone else could have done, given the paranoid cultural climate at the time.

And am I right in thinking that Clooney did not, after all, go with her becaue of her confession to him, when he had been intending to??

reply

"Did anyone else think she was rather sneering about how the last few jews took tremendous chances just to go to a restaurant or just to go out and about? But I wondered two things - one was how would such jews have the money and means to eat at expensive restaurants by 1943, and also, if she could spot that they were jews, surely anyone else could have done, given the paranoid cultural climate at the time."

I think the "sneering comment" on them going to a restaurant was just part of her trying to persuade herself that she had to do it in order to survive, and that if they were so stupid to go out and eat out, their fault.
You are probably right about the expensive restaurants thing. At that time, Jews weren't allowed to go (practically) anywhere, and that would include restaurants. But then the film was on shaky grounds with the whole backstory of the Lena character (a person that worked in sensitive areas underwent screenings, and surely would not have been accepted into the SS with a jewish spouse. People that didn't want to divorce their jewish spouses, generally suffered professionally and in their private lives (access to housing, later on food stamps, etc.)

That she could spot them could be explained easily: She knew them, or had heard of them. There was a network of those underground Jews (a few hundred to thousands in Berlin), helping each other and being helped. There have been collaborateurs that got into that network, and wreaked havoc by turning everyone in they could locate. A harrowing account of one such Jewish collaborator in 1940s Berlin is "Stella" by Peter Wyden (http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0385471793/. A terrifying read.

On your final question: I think Geismar was just shell-shocked of what he had heard from her just now. That wasn't a conscious decision to stay.
--
"I was born to speak all mirth and no matters." (Much Ado About Nothing, 1993)

reply