MovieChat Forums > Wonder Woman (2017) Discussion > Elizabeth Banks Faces Backlash for Sayin...

Elizabeth Banks Faces Backlash for Saying Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel Belong to 'Male Genre'


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/elizabeth-banks-faces-backlash-saying-210549550.html

The actress, who also serves as writer, director and producer on the just-released Charlie’s Angels reboot, gave some quotes to the Herald Sun recently that have sparked backlash on social media.

Speaking of her movie before it opened, Banks said that Charlie’s Angels had to perform well at the box office, otherwise it would further harm future female-led films. Since the interview’s publication, the movie went on to make a disappointing $8.6 million on opening weekend in North America.

“Look, people have to buy tickets to this movie, too. This movie has to make money,” Banks, 45, said. “If this movie doesn’t make money it reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don’t go see women do action movies.”

But while some would point to the success of recent female-led action movies like Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman, Banks said those don’t necessarily count since they’re part of bigger cinematic universes that are led by male actors.

“They’ll go and see a comic book movie with Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel because that’s a male genre,” Banks said. “So even though those are movies about women, they put them in the context of feeding the larger comic book world, so it’s all about, yes, you’re watching a Wonder Woman movie but we’re setting up three other characters or we’re setting up Justice League.”

“By the way, I’m happy for those characters to have box office success,” Banks added, “but we need more women’s voices supported with money because that’s the power. The power is in the money.”

The actress, who also serves as writer, director and producer on the just-released Charlie’s Angels reboot, gave some quotes to the Herald Sun recently that have sparked backlash on social media.

Speaking of her movie before it opened, Banks said that Charlie’s Angels had to perform well at the box office, otherwise it would further harm future female-led films. Since the interview’s publication, the movie went on to make a disappointing $8.6 million on opening weekend in North America.

“Look, people have to buy tickets to this movie, too. This movie has to make money,” Banks, 45, said. “If this movie doesn’t make money it reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don’t go see women do action movies.”

RELATED: Elizabeth Banks Says Kristen Stewart Is Charlie’s Angels‘ Secret Weapon: Fans ‘Will Be Delighted’

But while some would point to the success of recent female-led action movies like Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman, Banks said those don’t necessarily count since they’re part of bigger cinematic universes that are led by male actors.

“They’ll go and see a comic book movie with Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel because that’s a male genre,” Banks said. “So even though those are movies about women, they put them in the context of feeding the larger comic book world, so it’s all about, yes, you’re watching a Wonder Woman movie but we’re setting up three other characters or we’re setting up Justice League.”

“By the way, I’m happy for those characters to have box office success,” Banks added, “but we need more women’s voices supported with money because that’s the power. The power is in the money.”

Banks comments were not received well by some on social media, with people on Twitter saying that her movie just didn’t look good.

“Elizabeth Banks does know that women didn’t want to see her Charlie’s Angels movie either, right? I get it, Hollywood and the world really, is frustrating and sexist as heck but she should just face facts. As tough as it is, her movie just didn’t look appealing to people,” a Twitter user wrote.

“Elizabeth Banks is so talented but she is saying such idiotic things. Charlie’s Angels will flop not because men don’t want to see it but because the marketing is so f—- atrocious NOBODY wants to see it,” another echoed.

Still, others jumped to Banks’ defense and backed up her comments, agreeing that the superhero genre gave Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman a leg up that Charlie’s Angels didn’t have.

“[Clowns] twisting Liz Banks words by mentioning WonderWoman&CaptainMarvel as successful female lead action films are dumb, both of these films from either DC or Marvel which are destined to make BILLIONS bc of the same fanboys who claimed Charlie’sAngels is bad without even seeing it,” one user wrote.

“Elizabeth banks didn’t lie when she classified these films as ‘male genre’ because none of these had a fully female driven cast, whereas Charlie’s Angels had that and was more about female friendships and women at work without necessarily having any superpowers,” the user added in a follow-up tweet.

The actress later addressed Charlie’s Angels‘ lack of performance at the box office with a self-deprecating joke on Twitter.

reply

I think WW had like over 60% women saw it in the theater.

reply

Her pride has bruised. This one comment says it best:

“Elizabeth Banks is so talented but she is saying such idiotic things. Charlie’s Angels will flop not because men don’t want to see it but because the marketing is so f—- atrocious NOBODY wants to see it,”

reply

SHE'S RIGHT...BUT SHE IS SPEAKING FROM THE POSITION OF C.A. BEING GOOD...IT WAS AVERAGE AT BEST.

reply

LOL.

She's turned into a real lunatic.

reply

Some of the nutters here not only think it's a "male genre", they think it's a white male genre, and that movies about female or non-white superheroes make their dicks fall off.

Which is bull, there have been female superhero fans all along, and female superheroes for the last 70 -80 years. Nonwhite superheroes since the 1960s, if not earlier.

reply