MovieChat Forums > Blood Diamond (2006) Discussion > Do you think boys care about conflict di...

Do you think boys care about conflict diamonds?


Or do they care more about the symbolic control that gifts of diamonds afford them over females?

According to research conducted in the U.S., even when both marriage partners earn comparable incomes, husbands give more expensive gifts to their wives than vice versa.

For more than a century, diamonds given to women by men have symbolized the conventional male's preferred view of women as precious, ornamental and fragile.

It might therefore be worth considering how the factors driving the (blood) diamond trade -- lust for power and dominance on the one hand, and socioeconomic insecurity on the other -- are reprised (albeit in different ways) by the consumers of these diamonds, i.e. men in their pursuit of dominance over women and women in their pursuit of socioeconomic security.

http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap13.htm

This OP is a partial rejoinder to the flamebait thread "Do you think girls care about conflict diamonds?"

reply

Interesting that you interpret men buying more expensive gifts than women as a sign that men care less about the origin of diamonds. I mean, presumably there is no such issue with expensive flowers, chocolates or other, less contentious jewelry.

You say: "For more than a century, diamonds given to women by men have symbolized the conventional male's preferred view of women as precious, ornamental and fragile."

Or is it just that women like diamonds? If women play the part of "precious, ornamental and fragile" then that is their choice. Even if men like to see them that way, it is their choice to go along with it.

reply

interesting points.

i would argue that it is both. in any relationship of two people, the two people always share responsibility of how their relationship is. and in the society - all the members shape and influence the society they make up. so it is both male and females attitudes and behaviors shaping this model - BUT - it was begun by and as such one may say is mostly perpetuated by men.

if men did not want to dominate women and would not assign them a fixed place in society (that of fragile, to be cared for but unable to care for themselves) then women would not assume that position either. if you look at history - there were always women who did not want to be subservient to men and who fought against their assigned role in the society - either by various forms of protests or simply by refusing to fall into conventional "traps" of that time such as marriage and becoming a housewife. BUT those women were always ostracized and marginalized - mostly by men. women were pretty much slaves and any act of 'rebellion' was shunned and ostracized. would you really blame the rest of the slaves who did not rise up? who merely accepted the position assigned to them in their society? probably not, they did it for their lives and to live better than they would have had they rebelled. but some slaves just as some women did rise up. which is why we are where we are now. but the road is very long still, mostly because many women can't shake off so many years of being told who they are and what they ought to do. so we know now that men and women are equal, that they are capable of doing the same things, that a man is able to weep and a woman able to fight, that he can raise kids and she can work, they they can each live independently and both can take care of themselves - but the hundreds of years of the certain model imprinted in our societies, the generational traditions of women cooking and raising kids and men being the breadwinner told and 'taught' to us by our parents, grandparents, etc - take their toll. which is basically why there are women out there - and many of them - who do perpetuate this model of women as fragile and unable to take care for themselves.

and wanting a diamond ring for engagement - doesn't only perpetuate the stereotype of a woman as fragile and ornamental but also a woman as stupid and ignorant, not to mention shallow (but i guess the last one isn't typically only female related)

reply

sexist.

(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

reply

doesn't only perpetuate the stereotype of a woman as fragile and ornamental but also a woman as stupid and ignorant, not to mention shallow (but i guess the last one isn't typically only female related)

Excellent post, blackbirrd

I wonder if anyone has thoughts on the unequal reciprocity in gift-giving between men and women, not just in the Western world, but elsewhere as well.

reply

I would argue that the giving of more expensive gifts is not a symbol of power, but a feeling of obligation that society puts on men to treat their wives and make a bigger sacrifice. Would you be happy being expected to do all the spending?

Let's go inconspicuously...through the window.

reply

I have one word for you: potlatch.

reply

I think it is pretty pathetic that after watching this movie, white women try to put the blame on the shoulders of white men and vice versa. Is that what you take away from this movie, what you have learned? No, really?!

Face it, you are part of a society that is built on, and continues to profit from, third world countries. What kind of equipment you have between your legs is completely irrelevant. And all this whining about how women were supposedly treated badly way back when because they were given DIAMONDS - that takes the cake.

Did you get brainwashed and forced to kill your countrymen as a child? Or did you have to watch this happening to your children? I don't think so! So shut your face! You don't know what misery IS. One would think films like these would grant you some bloody insight, but noooooo...

reply

The 'control'? What the hell?

If I knew a girl and giving her a diamond was all I needed to get 'symbolic control' over her.. I'd cut ties with her immediately because that's weak and pathetic.

Or are you reading *beep* into things from your own imagination and wish to be offended constantly? Diamonds aren't 'fragile'. Diamonds are the toughest substance on earth. They are, according to the marketing anyway, supposed to represent love as something that will last forever.

For your info I will never buy a diamond regardless. It's a terrible investment and a scam, conflict diamond or not.

Just has to make a post to counteract your 'oh the patriarchy is offending me look at this fact that I made up' post.

reply

[deleted]