Why?


as if the first two werent bad enough, why not make a third movie for a good stephen king series like Pet Cemetary

reply

[deleted]

the filmmakers want money $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

reply

[deleted]

i don't think they will be making the movie for the money. i mean how much could it make. it's really about the art. this is a small labor of love for a few filmakers.

reply

I doubt that Mangler Reborn will be mistaken for art... you don't realize quite how much these cheesy straight to video horror movies rent... they'll make their money back and then some. Frankly if they can advertise their product and make it look attractive enough to pay $4 to see, they deserve to make their money back. More power to them.

reply

Reggie said this movie is going to be pretty bloody, and that will make it worth my while. I Love the gore.

as for why?
it's just a movie--calm down

reply

Why? Why not? One of my dear friends starred in the first and they had a great time shooting it. I won't watch the second one but I'll give this one a shot. Why don't people crap on films like Boogeyman or The grudge? Those films are terrible pieces of shyte.

reply

Well is was pretty bloody, not all that gory

But the acting in this movie is just so bad it almost hurts to watch. I mean it's almost as if you can hear the actors say: Oh what...say my line now...ok. When you watch them you can see them thinking ok act, don't act...ok start acting again. I don't know, maybe that has something to do with how it was edited, as well.

reply

The first one wasn't that bad. Yeah, it was FLAWED, but it was entertaining and the machine was creepy.

Hopelessly in love with Uma Thurman and Emmy Rossum

reply

the first one was awsome, not to mention it was an ACTUAL movie. the second was just a mess of techno music, off screen deaths, stupid teenagers.

----------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/foottothenuts

reply