MovieChat Forums > Mysterious Island (2005) Discussion > Possibly the worst film ever?

Possibly the worst film ever?


There are not many things that can be said about this film.....
Well there are, just none of them positive.

I can't imagine how you can take a good story, film it and have it come out actually rotting - like dead meat only the smell is worse...
The lighting is bad. The script is bad. The directing is almost criminal. The camera is out of focus half of the time. The balloon sequence could have been done better by a highschool a.v. student using 2 vcrs to composite the images.
The visual effects are so bad, they look like deliberate errors or someone's first try at film. The special effects were most likely done by a trainee while everyone else was too drunk to work.

Do yourself a favor - this is not worth watching even to see how BAD it can get.
I feel like ripping my eyes from the sockets, but that would not erase the images burned into my brain by this steaming bag of "oh my god, I am a director, see me wreck another investment".

reply

[deleted]

Plus the damn music was playing the majority of time throughout the movie or at least what I saw. I was dozing off throughout and just turned it off I guess about 3/4 of the way through. So fortunately I only saw about 1/2 of the movie; unfortunately I paid to rent it.

reply

Perhaps the worst TV movie ever, you mean. Worst (theatrical or otherwise) film ever is clearly Super Mario bros.

reply

I started reading the book a few weeks and I could not put it down, I flew through it because it was so amazing. I found this movie online and was so happy to see a movie was made of it. I watched about 20 minutes I think and turned off after Lemay (not in the book at all) was killed by an insect the size of a house (also not in the book at all).

This was HORRIBLE, I should have come here first to read about it, as I can see I am not the only one who thought this, but I didn't! Nemo was introduced in the first like 10 minutes and we meant him on page 700 of a 720 book, or whatever it was, and that was the big surprise!! Huge animals and extra characters just made it beyond stupid and I don't even want to watch the rest. I sincerely hope one day a GOOD film is made of this amazing novel...probably never will happen though.

"He was like a big gay hobo Santa Claus." Shadow_Chair on Mr. Friendly

reply

super mario is the greeatest movie ever compared top this crap hashha

reply

No.... he isn't.

reply

[deleted]

again.... no he isn't.
Where do you jerks come from? What are you some wannabe or do you actually work in our industry?
trolls... gotta hate em.

reply

****SPOILERS****

To sum up:
*Special effects: appalling.
*Script: weak.
*Costumes: the pirates' looked like cheap fancy dress outfits, Vinnie Jones's wig was very obvious. The ship wasn't very convincing either.
*Plot: cheesy (rescuers appear out of nowhere, the volcano blows up to deal with any loose ends), ludicrous (the balloon ride, the monsters), and meandering (the pirates, in particular). The treasure turned out to be easy to find after all. And there was no explanation why Nemo couldn't escape the volcano on the Nautilius.

It was if they sorted out cast and location and then ran out of money.

reply

Reading stuff like this convinces me that there are many on IMDB who've never watched real B movies.

Sure, this film is campy but it's not so bad. I'll be honest, I thought it was better than a lot of the types of films (even major Hollywood productions) that SciFi* channel runs.


* I refuse to use the spelling "SyFy." If they don't like it they can go jam it.

reply

You're right. I havn't seen Mysterious Island or whatever, I was just going through Kyle McLachlan (correct spelling?) filmography (sure he made a fool of himself in the overrated How I Met Your Mother, but he's a good actor, he even made me appreciate certain episodes of Desperate Housewives which is disturbing since my usual taste in movies are canonized medium-expanding but subversive works of art like Stratjka, Kirasshipo Potjomkin & L'age D'ôr, horror/found footage/crossover [e.g. Lake Mungo, Noroi, Audition, Hollow] & american & french grime/biographies/documentaries [Midnight Express, Scarface, JFK, Malcolm X, Un Prophete, Slam, Gomorra etc.], so even if my taste ain't the most sophisticated - I watch Terminator 2 twice a year since the mid-90's - Desperate Housewives is out of my range, to say the least, but when the person to me made demigod among actors by his haunting performance in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992) showed up in season 2 or 3, it became watchable all of a sudden) but when I saw someone contemplated on this movie being the worst of all time, I immidiately knew it wasn't someone within the industry or someone with more than pedestrian knowledge or interest in film.

There's, for example, romantic films, w/ budgets ranging from maybe 1000-5000 dollars, sold on seemingly independent labels (they're kinda like harlequin books, but films, and worse) The bulk of actors probably volunteer in hope of getting discovered while the lead actress (always a woman) get paid at least a little better than a waitress. Once in '05 when me & some friends were intoxicated & walked into a supermarket, a cover w/ a crazy hot, half-descent (i.e. not naked) woman catched my eye. I picked up a random handful of films of this brand, hoping it was very very softcore porn or something, or maybe some obscure 90's gems of some kind, unknown & low-budget murder mystery series or something, who knows? But no. It was like a mini-soap opera, 70 insufferable minutes of a downright offensive attempt at a movie, the most horrifying thing I've ever seen. I have seriously enjoyed puppet theaters w/ better & more subtle acting & even if I'm no big fan of porn I managed to got offended & provoked by the fact that they recorded this rank abomination in the kind of mid-priced white LA-houses-/condos w/ all white interiors & a yucca palm in the corner they use in typ A1 porn. So it felt twice as disgusting - if they would've hurled their lines at each other in a forest or in an airport instead, one could try to watch the backgrund & zone out. They walked past a artificial pond with a little fountain now & again, probably to give the illusion of a course of events, moving forward in time. There was only two characters of any dramatic value; the woman & the man. We didn't watch any of the other two (btw brand new at this time, prod. year 2003), we bought these three dvd-shaped chunks of offal for about 15 SEK (1 USD) each but it hurt anyway. Anything with Kyle McLachlan & an unnecessary dragonfly, uninspired acting & ugly CGI or whatever they said about the mysterious island is fine with me, in comparison w/ e.g. the Kardashians. And DEFINITIVELY compared to these vile harlequin-style drama/romance-anathemas. There's a million movies out there worse than Plan 9 from Outer Space (not only cause it's so bad its good or anything like that), the industry, just like any industry, doesn't always produce cause of supply & demand; my guess is larger corporations own these little studios & distribute them by their supermarket/gas station branch, maybe to fill some quota to be able to perform some legal hocuspocus or to be able to pass along debt to these little proxy-owned studios/offices & then declare them bankrupt & the IRS strikes down on the goalie. Enough theories now, havn't slept in 48 hours, I'm rambling. There's always worse movies, that's my message in a nutshell. G'night.

reply

[deleted]




An absolutely dire film. I was constantly laughing at the special effects! Suffice to say I didn't watch it all.



''All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain .... Time to die''.

reply

[deleted]