I was shocked by the ending!


I thought the movie was just a rip off of the first 2, and was totally bored; until the ending!! I sat up and was like, "Holy *beep* I was completely shocked, I didn't expect it at all.

reply

The oh-so-obvious question: How did it end?

Oh, come-on, I'll never ever ever see this movie myself, but you brought up the subject! Anyone who doesn't want to ruin the "suspense" can just look away...

reply

i do not agree there the first movies i alot better
!

reply

Didn't the ending mean that the two girls were actually step sisters.
Spoiler alert
Since the female cop (Dina Meyer) turned out to be the poor girl's mom, and the rich girl's step dad was the poor girls biological father.

It makes the lesbo even more kinky.

Peter Pan flew with children Lois,... a Fairytail.

reply

No, it didn't mean that. Jay was only a step father to Marie, so those girls didn't have any of the parents in common.

"Life sucks and then you *beep* die, you know..." -Ozzy Osbourne

reply

yes they would be step sisters.Maybe you should check the definition.Not blood related,but step sisters because she's her father's step daughter

reply

Exactly, but see thats why the movie is called Wild Things.
In the first, it was to be understood that Suzie (Neve Campbell) was Denise Richards' character's aunt..

So, whats that tell ya? :)

reply

The ending was completely retarded. I hope you were shocked by the sheer stupidity of it.

MOVIES BY THE MINUTE --> http://moviesbytheminute.blogspot.com

reply

i sort of guessed the mom was in on it the second she starting making out with the cop after she seen the cash.

Once the buzzer went off on the girl, i knew she was in on it because the somehow both of them plotted exactly what would happen in advance

ie

1. girls would chase guy
2. cop at that moment puts money in drawer
3. make out steal card
4. buzzer goes off so cop can't get his

Since there was so many plotholes up to that point i just could read the laziness put into that sequence.

reply

so bloody predictable. Lame copy of Wild things one. I spotted twists before it happened.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The movie might be derivative, and yes, you can spot the twists far ahead.
But heck, I had a good time.
Nobody should expect a "Wild Things" type a movie to be wholly mind-boggling, dazzling, and an all new masterpiece that reinvents the genre. Come on.
It was slick entertainment, and the actors were sleazy and fun to watch.
Worked much better for me than part 2, which I found boring.

THE MOST 'SHOCKING' THING: (SPOILER!!!):
At the very end, when that sleazy stepfather ogles his stepdaughter's gf's sexy little butt....only to find out seconds later that he is her biological father. Nice!!

reply

I don't think you could see all the twists. Or even explain them! I don't understand how the mom was in it, and what she had to gain? It made perfect sens up the last scene, but then I ws lost with the implied scheming of step-dad, mom and the lawyer too- who was scammed and what for??

myspace.com/bankrupteuropeans

Coz lifes too short to listen to Madlib

reply

It was like the first two movies with all the scamming going on. The mom poisoned the stepdad's drink because he was the one that raped her back in the day and he was Elena, the poor girl's birth father. So they killed him to get to the diamonds. The lawyer knew all about and he was helping them. I agree with the other poster who said what Wild Things is about. You know there's gonna be a twist at some point but they ALWAYS catch you offguard with them. The ending of the original, the sequel and this one were very well done.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit' me!" Hudson in Aliens.

reply

[deleted]