Okay, the blonde one kinda is, but nothing too special. The thing is they look SO hot on the cover, especially the brunette (in the white bikini), but in the movie she just isn't that great....somehow. Anyone agree?
They look pretty good, but certainly the least attractive of the series. But one cool thing, is how this is the only one in the series, where the girls look even remotely high school aged.
I thought the blonde girl had a very nice figure. Better than many of the A-list actresses I see in big movies. I wonder if she is doing any other films.
Russell Crowe is the exception, but Bobby Brown is the rule!?
THEY'RE ALL HOT,INCLUDING DINA MEYER,WHO NO ONE EVEN MENTIONED IN THIS POST.ALL OF THESE BABES ARE WAY HOTTER THAN THAT UGLY LOOKING MONKEY,NEVE CAMPBELL.
THE CHICK THAT WAS REALLY HOTT WAS THE ONE WHO JOINED THE GIRLS IN THE SHOWER.I THINK HER NAME WAS RISSA.YOU SEE THIS SCENE WHEN THEY SHOW YOU WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE DURING THE MOVIE,WHILE THE ENDING CREDITS ARE ROLLING.
I agree. I mean, neither girl is BAD-looking, just not anything special. They both have slammin' bodies, though. But, there's no way in HELL that I could EVER be convinced of Sarah Laine playing a teenager. Sandra (who's 3 years older than Sarah) passes more for a teen than Sarah does.
maybe the actual definition of a woman who is not ugly...but also not hot.
A solid 5...
Unless of course she takes off her clothes like in Starship Troopers...at which point she immediately drops even lower.
Not all women can look like the main girls from these movies...but come on...Dina Meyer? What was she even doing in this movie? There had to be cheap, nobody actresses willing to work for peanuts who were actually hot...