MovieChat Forums > Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough (2005) Discussion > Sandra McCoy + Sarah Laine are lame Act...

Sandra McCoy + Sarah Laine are lame Actresses!

posted 16 years ago by Tyrant_Rise
8 replies | jump to latest

Why were Sandra McCoy & Sarah Laine given the parts in this movie? Wild things was one the best films ever, to see the sequel and 3 edition just ruined by bad actors and actress just makes me sick.

Also why did these actresses take the parts if they didn't want to do nude scenes? I hate actresses that use Body doubles, and they knew if the original movie contained nudity in it then there is a strong possibility that this one would have nudity too. These actresses should have never been given these parts if they are too much of cowards to show some skin. This part could have been given to an actress like Bijou Phillips or Kari Wuhrer.

I say we boycott movies that use body doubles! it's just decreases the value of the film and the fact that you know it's fake just ruins it and it's not fair on real actors and actress that have to show themselves.

I say give respect to the real actresses that have the guts to do their own nude scenes and stunts, you Hollywood bimbos suck!

[–] squirtx1 16 years ago

i think it takes guts to say no i will not do a nude scene. most directors and studios actually repect those actresses that dont do nudity. it also shows that there is not enough money in the world that would make them compremise their beliefs

[–] nintendo64-1 16 years ago

That's true only in America. They still have very strong prudish beliefs.

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Brandestoc 11 years ago

What's the difference?? Either way you see a naked body.

I think the truth is, you're just complaining because you were hoping to see that particular actress in the nude and the fact that you were denied that simply frustrated you. Silly perverted dimwit.

[–] bryguy615 9 years ago

you go into a film like Wild Things EXPECTING to see nudity & Lesbian scenes. So for some nothing actress to refuse nudity is moronic, since thats the whole point of the series. However, if you saw WT1 ,then you know that they'll cop-out to the "big" name actress, Neve Campbell, & not show her naked. But no, a straight to home video sequel should not pull that *beep* you come for the nudity, get them naked or get them out of there.

[–] DontDisturbMyParadise 8 years ago

That Was definately Sandra McCoy in the scene during the last credits, in the shower rooms. When the 2 characters are kissing naked, they are not body doubles.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

At least McCoy ended up doing nudity in Femme Fatales.

[–] agentalbert (2321) 7 months ago

The three some scene, which is a hallmark of the Wild Things template, and so pretty much required is a key one for any WT movie. So I agree, any actress who isn't going to do the scene shouldn't take the part and the producers shouldn't cast anyone who won't do it.

It's a bit frustrating to see the "boob only" insert shots, which are pretty much a dead giveaway for body double. But it also does seem like there are at least 1-2 shots where you see Sandra McCoy's face and chest at same time. The scenes are so dark, though, I could be mistaken.

At least Serah D'Laine does actual nudity in the shower scene about 40 minutes in. And you do see a bit of both Serea and Sanda in the credits shower scene that suggests another 3-some with a girl.

The scene I really liked where I thought they looked best together was about 35 minutes in where Elena is laying on the bed and Marie is ove rtop of her kissing her from behind. Very sexy looking.