Terrible Artsy *beep* I love Bjork, but this is *beep*

*beep* I have a degree in art and the film is pretentious crap. "It's not really a movie, it's an installment piece." (as some moron claimed in an earlier post). WRONG. It's a film. It's nothing like an 'installation' piece, and seeing you bandy about terms like that shows you clearly don't know anything of 'art' and you're just gonna drool and crap for this tripe like any other common sheep who takes this drivel for 'artistry' when the best thing about it is probably the visuals on a purely superficial level, but the 'points' he's trying to make are weak and prideful.

And he's hardly a 'respected artist', most people in the art field don't find him brilliant but rather they find most of his work redundant. Have you seen the one with the guy masturbating in the giant industrial machine? *beep* lame. I don't know a single artist who would call him a genius, unless they are a magazine shill or someone else in the industry who kisses the ass of these pompous asses.

Just listen to this industry minion fawning over him ""Is Barney's work a new beginning for a new century?", asks Richard Lacayo, writing in Time. "It feels more like a very energetic longing for a beginning, in which all kinds of imagery have been put to the service of one man's intricate fantasy of return to the womb. Something lovely and exasperating is forever in formation there. Will he ever give birth?" WHAT THE *beep*!? WILL HE GIVE BIRTH? Shut the *beep* up. What moronic *beep*
'Cause I ride like Kelly Bundy, Yo I keep that *beep* nasty~ (Spank Rock)