MovieChat Forums > A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (2001) Discussion > New smoking gun! White carpet layer behi...

New smoking gun! White carpet layer behind astronaut

posted 11 years ago by WWu777
4 replies | jump to latest

White carpet layer placed over dirt behind astronaut – New discovery!

Here is a much large image that I want you to open in a new window and click again to zoom in on and look at closely, because it contains a NEW SMOKING GUN that I discovered! If you look at the ground behind the astronaut’s boots, you can see the edge of a WHITE LAYER placed over the dirt! It appears to be some type of carpet, canvas or ledge. You can even see the edges and creases on it at the line where it overlays the dirt! In addition, you can see that the lunar rover tracks end where the white layer begins. This is a smoking gun I discovered but don't see mentioned on any other sites yet!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/Scott_Gives_Salute_ -_GPN-2000-001114.jpg

Here is a zoom up of the carpet layer:

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/fp50b52b6a.jpg

You can see the line between the cloth layer and the dirt, suggesting that the layer was placed OVER the dirt. You can even see slight creases in it. What could be more obvious than that?

More evidence of moon hoax here:
http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Conspiracies.htm

[–] jaywindley 11 years ago

I see only your inability to determine lighting direction and likely shade/shadow features.

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mradam-3 10 years ago

This is just separate hills and pieces of land exhibiting different brightnesses. So what? There is no cloth or carpet or anything. How could you possibly determine cloths or carpets from just the appearance of an edge? That's a guess. And it's somebody else's, and you just piggy-backed on it. You're just parroting these claims without any thought.

Your claims are all old and defeated long ago.

Your debunkingskeptics.com cites "Identical backdrops" and a whole bunch of other bull. Are you blind? Can't you see they are not identical at all? Look at the point of overlap between closer hills and more distant hills. There are clearly differences indicating sideways movement. Those are the results of taking pictures of the same distant mountain ranges from different angles, and they are fine. In fact, because hoaxtards pointed out these "identical" backdrops, and they are in fact different, the real moon landings are even further supported. How are there these little differences in the mountain background? Because the mountain is really in the photographs, and it is slightly rotated in 3 dimensions due to sideways movement of the camera between pictures.

The site's parroting of the same old "identical backdrops" argument further proves the real landings.

[–] mcgill-646-33556 10 years ago

NEW SMOKING GUN that I discovered!

If I were you, I'd be focussing on a new wacky idea that will explain those 6 LM descent stages, flags, footprints, 3 rovers and the other rubbish left behind all those years ago. Remember, the Chinese are only a few years away from a landing. And those HD photos coming back from the reconnaissance satellites...

Get cracking!! I'd hate to see 40 years of conspiracies go to waste. Just remember; it will have to be as funny and far-out as all the other ones you guys have already come up with. Lots a luck.