MovieChat Forums > Pathfinder (2007) Discussion > I saw the unrated version for sale at wa...

I saw the unrated version for sale at walmart

posted 16 years ago by njboy84
12 replies | jump to latest

I saw the dvd at walmart for like 8 bucks or some price that was pretty low. Is it worth buying? Or should I just save my money on something else?

Any opinions on how this was?

[–] tomimt 16 years ago

I haven't seen the theatric cut, but I bought my uncut copy from a sales bin myself and was positively surprised by it. Couple of decapitations are shown, some fake looking blood spatters, dogs eating intestrals of some slain indiands etc.

[–] knightridergal 9 years ago

Hmm wonder if thats the version i saw on tv last night was on late like 9 pm and had decapitationns and dogs eating dead corpses (and the vikings eating what looked like the brains of their victims after the slaughtered them -- after the scene where several indians fell into ghost's vikings trap)

[–] uglyredhill 15 years ago

Unrated, at Walmart? Now you know it's just a DVD marketing gimmick.

Supposedly you get all the stuff that retailers and cinema chains don't want you to see. In reality, you get to pay twice for the same product.

/aside

[–] jimmysmitsimdb 15 years ago

"Any opinions on how this was?"

Bad. Very bad.

And stupid.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] gregoryland8 15 years ago

its a medieval 300 without the interesting dialogue and spin

America was not discovered by Americans - shame on them.

[–] Every_Time_I_Die 15 years ago

300 had interesting dialogue???

[–] mannig-1 15 years ago

300 - dialogue ??? WELL SPOKEN !! more: Pathfinder HAS a real story behind it all, 300 NOT. only ONE example for comparing Films with soul (Pathf.) and bubblegum-coloured BIGGGGG movies like 300.

[–] bateman_ce 15 years ago

Saw the unrated version and it still has many problems and is very boring. I get what they tried to do but its very weak in execution. I don't know who's fault that is. The director, writer or producer.

[–] cathercreis 15 years ago

I got it at Wal-mart for $7.50 too. It's about average. Cinematography was the best part: very dark and gloomy, the way I like it. Action was acceptable; I'll watch it again just for the sword fights. All in all, I would have probably been pi$$ed if I had paid $19.95 for it. But at $7.50, it's not such a bad deal.

[–] stalkingwolf83 14 years ago

Trust me, even if you're paid to watch it you should still avoid it.

Signatures are dumb...

[–] indy_go_blue44 12 years ago

I just picked up the R-rated version at Big Lots for $3 on Thursday and thought I'd come here and see what my fellow IMDb'ers had to say about it. 5.1 rating, mixed bag of reviews and comments. I figure if it's not <4.0 like "Apocolypse 2012" I didn't waste my money too bad, so I guess I'll go watch it now.