to those who dont think frd was a coward, read this...


if history is telling the truth, then Robert ford shot an unarmed jesse from behind. how is that not being a coward? I think there was some kind of code of the west about not shooting children, women or unarmed men. and the fact that he was unarmed and shot from behind, well then that is being a coward. I mean like the guys that killed john tunstill. he was unarmed too. so I guess people don't think they were cowards either then huh.

reply

The way it is presented in the movie Jesse's death is neither an assassination nor is Robert a coward.

reply

lol the OP mentions a "code" of ethics! funny stuff. in the book, one of the members of Jesse's gang shoots a little girl, ruining her leg forever. in another robbery, a young man is gunned down on his way to school.
Ford was in bed with snakes and he was only 19 years old. how would you save your own life? get in a duel with one of the fastest most accurate gun fighters alive? i think not.

that's what she said

reply

and if you read more into it, you will read that that shooting of the girl was an accident and jesse and his gang even offered to pay the girls medical bills.

reply

Not code of the ol'West....THIS IS LAW OF THE LAND...CIRCA:PRESENT DAY WITHSTANDING! You don't shoot children. You don't shoot women(unless they're gangsta-ass BITCHES ARMED TO THE T- LIKE YOU)...AND RULE #1- Shooting unarmed Man is ETERNAL DAMNATION....let alone IN THE FRIKIN' BACK??!!??!! There is and never has been, nor shall ever be, a more finite, clearcut, open/shut case of COWARDLY ACTION. The deal, and a cowardly one at that...wasn't for COLD-BLOODED ASSASINATION of an elusive CRIMINAL. It was to haul him in. He had his bro Chuckie as backup....2 on 1...odds favor the turncoats....but NO. BACKSTABBING, SPINELESS, JEALOUS baby ROBT wanted go make a name for himself. He was sick and tired of being a nobody...He was literally invisible....for a lifetime...and when he stalked the James Gang, finally permeating the fortress- his glamourization took hold and he vicariously tried w/all his energy..to become the BANDIT OF THE ERA....realizing he'd never in a million years even scratch surface of Jesse's LEGENDARY STATUS, decided to formulate the dispicable plan of MURDEROUS revenge. Ford would stop at nothing to contrive his own iconic stature......all this points directly at his below sea-level self-esteem, his sappy-self pity, robust wannabe tendencies.....and he sold JEssE out....worse than sellout...He Murdered in cold blood....unarmed.....As I stated in another

reply

Jesse James was a worthless pig who shot others in the back with no warning. He was a criminal robber and murderer. It makes me sick to read everyone condemning Ford but not James. People who do that must love criminals and crime in general. It's really despicable. If karma is real, then those who condemn Ford and glorify James should be robbed and murdered themselves.

reply

So what does that make Jesse James? He had no issues with shooting men in the back.

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

any proof of that?

reply

yes there is plenty of evidence to show that Jesse has no qualms shooting people in the back. in the film and the book he shoots one of his own friends in the back of the head while they're riding horses. furthermore, the book mentions a robbery wherein Jesse knocks a bank manager unconscious then stands over him for some time, thinking apparently before blowing his brains out all over the floor. unarmed? unconscious? shot in the head. hmmmmm. seems a little scociopathic to me.

when i first saw the film, i disliked Robert Ford. however, when i read the book (which goes into what Robert does in the years after killing Jesse) i got a new appreciation for him as a man. i think he was surly scared when he shot Jesse, but overall i don't think he was a coward. in his later life, armed men try to run him out of town, threatening to lynch him. yet he stays and continues to run his bar. in the face of great danger, he stays. perhaps this was his way of trying to live down the reputation of being a coward, but i guess we'll never really know. i just think out and out calling Ford a coward is a bit harsh. there were extenuating circumstances..

that's what she said

reply

um you do know that this movie and the book are made up, don't you? im talking about in real life

reply

of course i know. do you? you are saying Bob Ford was a coward based on what you saw in a film (that you just pointed out was made up).

that's what she said

reply

I was never talking about the movie or the book. I was talking about what I read on the real story from historians.

reply

you know that JJ was involved in the massacre of 200 unarmed men and boys in Missouri led by some douche named Quantrill. It was a sickening fact to find, not as revolting as Quantrill himself who had lists of execution orders with people as young as 15 on there.. Both that guy and his brother used the civil conflicts and jay hawking(not sure what that means, but Im guessing its considered bad by confederates). They then all fled like cowards and headed to Texas for the winter to avoid capture.. Served under some guy named Bill Anderson for a while too who had a penance for violence as well. It was pretty sad and heartbreaking that anyone could kill men and boys so viciously, with such warped perceptions. What I don't get really is Ford's creepy persona, his motives of obsession or what type of idolization has occurred, and why was he like that? Can someone explain that to me? And how could he kill someone he like worshipped, and why did James hate him? But then kept him around, treated him nice, almost killed him, and like stared at him repeatedly in his own creepy way.. I don't know this whole movie stuck with me, but theres no info online about this

reply

What I don't get really is Ford's creepy persona, his motives of obsession or what type of idolization has occurred, and why was he like that? Can someone explain that to me? And how could he kill someone he like worshipped, and why did James hate him? But then kept him around, treated him nice, almost killed him, and like stared at him repeatedly in his own creepy way.. I don't know this whole movie stuck with me, but theres no info online about this


There is very little information about Bob Ford, so if you're talking the facts of who Bob Ford in real life was and what precisely motivated him, what there is that's tangible is limited. There's really only that rather haunting child-seeming photo of Ford after he'd killed Jesse (http://www.legendsofamerica.com/photos-outlaws/BobFord-500.jpg) and a few accounts of things he said. In itself that photo seems to suggest something of Bob Ford though - at least that when he killed Jesse he really was only a boy.

So, I can only go by the film/book. In real life though, the Fords were from the same area as the James family. So while when they were kids I suppose dime novels of Jesse James would be available to everyone, there was likely even more for Bob to hook onto, knowing of the family and (as obviously happens) the case of one day meeting and becoming involved with Jesse to is a real possibility in child-Bob's world. It's conveyed really though as that Bob simply idolises Jesse. I noticed once that you know in his box of Jesse stuff in the film - Bob lifts out the top novel first and it seems like that one is separate, special. It's called "Jesse James' Protector". Maybe in Bob's fantasies he imagined this position being his place.

The way Bob is obsessed with and ingratiated himself within the James gang is a little creepy and he's certainly a bit odd. But this said, surely every person has their obsessions - has had things they've fantasised about. Usually such fancies are more fleeting than Bob's, but equally Bob is young - as a child Jesse has been his hero. The world was smaller than and Jesse was as Bob describes "as big as a tree" - something to aspire to. Given a few years, likely Bob would have instead been able to look to this and use it as inspiration to achieve by his own means, but at 19 he is still the child who sees the only (and best) way to achieve something akin to Jesse as by getting close to him, almost like he might become part of the stories he's read just by being there, talking with the man.

Obviously when he becomes entangled with the James gang, things don't go as Bob hoped. No-one takes him seriously as it has always been in his life and Jesse is not much like the Jesse he knows and idolises in reality. But he doesn't and can't let go of his idolisation entirely despite this.

The turning point for Bob in terms of what's possible is his killing Wood Hite 'cause Hite is Jesse's cousin and if/when Jesse discovers Bob's involvement (as if he ever found Dick Liddel) he'd kill 'em - it's not a question, but a fact that'd occur.

Even so, Bob's demeanour and feelings towards Jesse change the most not when this happens but when, when he next sees Jesse, Jesse begins to mock him and tells the story about the guy who betrayed him…

Bob and Jesse are similar in the sense that they both crave fame (not in the same way as people do today… or maybe in the same way - in the sense that they crave the immortality of fame and the general pubic love and to be something in this life - to be something lasting - to do something people will remember) and Bob wants the notoriety and to be the hero in the dime novels he read Jesse as. Killing Jesse he thinks is his way to achieve this. He thinks he'll be loved for it. He kills Jesse for the hope of fame, because in the end Jesse would kill him otherwise and for money. He was young and didn't think it's implications though or even understand what they'd be. But even (in the film at least) as you see Bob kill Jesse, you still see there's a part of him that still sees him as his idol and wants not to do it. 'Course the film includes much complexity regarding Jesse's involvement in his own demise also. But Bob is terrified and really does not want to kill Jesse - but at the pint where he does kill him he has to do this - it really is a choice - kill Jesse James or soon be killed yourself. And this is certainly his only chance.

The saddest thing for Bob is that in killing Jesse, he kills his own future at just 20 too as he's then forever defined by that act and nothing he can do can change people's perception's of him. In real life, despite the public hatred of him he did go on to be a successful business man, with his own Saloon and there's such a sense of the man he perhaps could have been had he not been involved with Jesse. I've read the novel which contains a lot more detail regarding Bob's life after shooting Jesse. I think the film as is conveys the feeling of Bob's future fine, but in the book Bob is again and again forced to start over and yet still achieves fair success, even though he never at all loses the public perception as the coward who shot Jesse James. Bob thinks of readjusting his hopes even - he never gives up. Where once he wished to be the kind of hero Jesse James was, now he merely hopes that one day he could achieve enough that he might do some thing that people might at least recall other than that one event. He knows he cannot escape it, but he remains hopeful for the smallest of escapes from who he is perceived as.

I will also add that for me the film shows both Jesse and Bob as flawed individuals. Jesse is obviously portrayed as a sociopath, but not without awareness of this terrifying side to himself. He has no remorse for the crimes he has done and in fact craves and enjoys violence and crime and danger, yet his is very charismatic and is a loving husband and father. And he is aware of what he's done and who he is as he reaches the end of his life. Jesse James was slitting throats and I presume scalping people and goodness knows what else from the age of fifteen - when he began doing this it must have been a thing he learned from older men, but it became who he was as a man.

Bob, on the other hand is not portrayed as psychotic remotely. He's just a small person who dreams big and who maybe could have got there but instead got somewhere terrible.

On the topic, Bob Ford isn't a coward, but it is a cowardly act to shoot an unarmed man in the back… and yet it's also brave to kill such a dangerous man and to live with him with the knowledge that you're double crossing him for some time. And also it's noted that Bob missed Jesse too after his death and mourned his loss as a person. He was a friend and Bob did betray him.

Jesse shot friends in the back too so if we want to define this as cowardice, even in the film he shoots Ed Miller in the back.

It's late at night and I should have written this in the morning! Oh well! What was the question again?!

As for Jesse's feelings towards Bob: Jesse has reached the end of the line in terms of gang members - everyone else is in jail or dead - he doesn't have much choice by the end but to keep Bob and Charley around. There are many aspects to what Jesse sees in Bob - In once sense perhaps he sees the possibility for any future Bob has, which Jesse ow no longer does - Bob hasn't really as yet been involved in any crimes (that one train robbery he was there but didn't do anything) and Jesse is at a stage in life where his future is closing in: the public no longer want the outlaw standing for the South they once did - times have moved on. There's no place for him and yet he cannot put his crimes behind him, because they are part of who he is and what he needs to do and because he committed them. Bob on the other hand, to Jesse has infinite possibility. Jesse envies this and ironically in his killing of Jesse Bob strips this from himself.

On the other hand, Bob idolises Jesse in a way that the turning tide of the public don't any more - he helps his ego in some sense. Then, the reason Jesse is so unpredictable is his own mental state - he is depressed, increasingly and utterly paranoid, add in all the elements of what his childhood have made him to be as a man and he is a psychopath too. The film talks of him covering his mood swings by being overly cordial.

It's also implied that Jesse craves death to some degree certainly. If you want to take it to the extreme you could go so far as to say he sets the whole thing up from the start - takes in the boy who idolises him, plants the story in his head about a boy in the past who was similar and betrayed him…. but only because Jesse himself had betrayed the boy in an awful way in deed and in trust… he mocks Bob… he does what he can to turn him against him - love and hate so close and all…. in the end he presents Bob with the very weapon to kill him and even, ultimately with his own back, free of the weapons he's usually keep with him at all times. We see in the film that Jesse seems to see Bob pointing the gun at him in the moment before he dies. Is this what he wanted or expected? Is it akin to shooting the ice - he just thought he'd see what'd happen? It's oblique and you can interpret it to being this degree - Jesse knowing that he was soon to be caught anyway and would sooner die at Bob's hand knowing of the eventual fame that'd bring rather than go to prison and being hanged as a criminal… He could have had that much awareness of his own myth…. to at the other degree just being a vague craving for death/depression Jesse has and all else comes from Bob entirely.

What a long and incoherent paragraph! I am sure you can put together a lot more intelligible ideas than me in a few minutes at midnight, but I hope I've provided a place to start.

Maybe the best thing is that it just shows these two people as being humanly flawed - both have both admirable and negative aspects to them.

But for anyone who on viewing the film perceives Bob Ford to be a coward, you've missed the point of the film at least for whatever else this film is it is Robert Ford's eulogy. It is his story. And at worst you should surely at least find him pitiable, but if you are watching openly, then while you do also empathise a lot with Jesse, you should certainly empathise with Bob.

SORRY! LONG!

reply

Well stated! I totally agree, spiral_static!

reply

Jesse James took part in the Centralia Massacre, and most historians agree that he executed Ed Miller for talking too much about some of the gang's robberies

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

and some historians believe he faked ed millers death so he could leave the gang

reply

i see where you're coming from. well at least in the context of the story presented in the book and film, Jesse was a pretty crazy guy..

that's what she said

reply

I could be wrong, but I don't think you'll find many legit historians who buy into that theory. It holds no more weight than a folk tale passed down by certain family members, not unlike the "theory" that Jesse James faked his own death with Bob Ford's help. Many family members held to that theory too. If you're giving Jesse James the benefit of the doubt in that regard, then you might as well give Bob Ford the benefit of the doubt. Or you could, you know, accept the historical consensus, which is that Jesse James executed Ed Miller and Bob Ford executed Jesse James.


But, just for the sake of argument, lets pretend that Jesse James did fake Ed Miller's death...according to Bob Ford he wasn't aware of any of that. As far as he knew, Jesse cowardly shot his friend in the back and was likely to do the same to him and his brother. Bob claimed that he felt he was in mortal danger, so if we're going on what-ifs then we have to give his side of the story the benefit of the doubt too.

And you still haven't addressed the Centralia Massacre.




http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

"And you still haven't addressed the Centralia Massacre."

who is "you"? me? or someone else?

ps-
you make very interesting points!

that's what she said

reply

No, I was addressing Southgeorgiagirl. Thanks for the compliment though!

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

well even ed millers own family believe jesse faked eds death.

and the Centralia massacre. ok well what can I say, war can make you do crazy and stupid things. in the heat of the moment you do things you never thought you would. there is a possibility that the guerillas and james were told something about the soldiers on the train that wasn't true and that's why they did that. not saying that's true but its a possibility. also like I said, it was war and your mind can become messed up. I mean look at our own soldiers in irag or afganistan whichever one it was that gang rape a little girl and burned her alive. war can make you do crazy, stupid and evil things to people who didn't deserve it.

reply

And some of Jesse James' family believed that he faked his own death too. But like I said, it's better to work off the historical consensus than the what-ifs.

And once again, no matter which story you believe, Bob Ford had good reason to fear for his life. You seem to jump through hoops to exonerate Jesse James of cowardice, but you're more than willing to accuse Bob Ford of cowardice when the historical record basically shows that they were guilty of the same thing.

I wouldn't call the Centralia Massacre "crazy" and "stupid" so much as "evil" and "shameful". Why are you making up "possibilities" here, and what kind of information could the guerrillas have had that would justify murdering a large group of men in cold blood anyway? As I said before, Bob Ford was afraid that Jesse James would kill him and his brother because Jesse had read about the arrest and confession of Dick Liddel in the the newspaper that very day, and Bob was under the impression that Jesse killed Ed Miller (whether he did or not...although I'd say he most likely did). Bob's killing of Jesse James was far more justified than participation in the Centralia Massacre.

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

[deleted]

i'm going to have to side with Samoan Bob on this topic.

Even if you ignore everything in the book and film, you still have to face the fact that Jesse James was a prolific killer (weather he committed this crime or that) and Bob Ford was not.

that's what she said

reply

(weather he committed this crime or that)

What does the weather have to do with anything?

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

I make up possibilities because nobody knows for a fact what happened way back then. most of the stuff that people knew about outlaws of the old west came from dime novels and they weren't exactly known for telling the truth. people also believed billy the kid killed 21 men, when in fact he is only known for killing 4, the guy that was bullying him, ollinger and bell, and brady, and even then no one can say for certain he fired the shot that killed brady. most of the stories about them are made up. I mean really how do we even know that jesse was there during that massacre? and how do you justify shooting somebody in the back of the head and not think that's being a coward? and if historical records show they are guilty of the same thing then why are you saying jesse was a coward but not ford? and let me ask you something, what would you call what our own soldiers did to that little girl? heroic and brave?

reply

A couple things:

"I make up possibilities because nobody knows for a fact what happened way back then."

You came here telling everyone that Bob Ford was a coward. Based on what? Those pesky facts that happened way back then?

You're not being consistent. If we're going to make up possibilities in order to exonerate someone, then why not make them up to exonerate Bob Ford? You're picking and choosing who you defend. Why?

"I mean really how do we even know that jesse was there during that massacre?"

Now you're just being ridiculous. Frank James testified that Jesse was at the Centralia Massacre. Who are you to argue with his own brother? Lets make up more possibilities as to why Frank would say such a thing. Maybe Frank was always mad at Jesse because he never paid him back 5 dollars he owed him.

"and how do you justify shooting somebody in the back of the head and not think that's being a coward?"

That's what I'm asking you. I've never said Bob Ford was justified, just *more* justified than Jesse's participation in a wholesale massacre. Bob Ford shot Jesse James because of his violent reputation, which included the murder of Ed Miller (whether or not it really happened, Bob believed it did and that was enough) and the slaughter of the Centralia Massacre. Jesse James was reaping the whirlwind for a life of violence. I've never once said Bob Ford wasn't a coward. I've said that *if* Bob Ford was a coward, so was Jesse James. Doubly so, in fact.

"and if historical records show they are guilty of the same thing then why are you saying jesse was a coward but not ford?"

Where do I say that? I'm saying if Bob Ford was a coward, then Jesse James was too. You seem really intent on convincing people of the former, but unwilling to concede the latter, despite historical consensus.

"and let me ask you something, what would you call what our own soldiers did to that little girl?"

I have no idea what you're talking about here.


Look, I've been willing to work within your criteria this whole thread...the problem is you change your criteria for each man. So far you've said Bob Ford is a coward based on the fact that he shot Jesse James in the back. I've said Jesse James is a coward based on the fact that he murdered Ed Miller and participated in an unjust massacre. Then you said that there's a theory that Ed Miller's death was a hoax (which no legit historian believes). Based on that criteria, I said there's a theory Jesse James' death was a hoax (which is about as valid a theory as Ed Miller's death hoax) and asked why you're ignoring the Centralia Massacre. Then you try to come up with reasons why Jesse James participated in the massacre. So I came up with reasons why Bob Ford felt he needed to kill Jesse James (actually, I didn't "come up" with anything, I'm just citing the historical record). Now you're asking how we even know that Jesse James was at the Centralia Massacre, despite his brother's eyewitness testimony that he was. So what criteria have you left me with? I guess I could just say, "How do we even know that Bob Ford was even present when Jesse James killed himself? Maybe Zee accidentally did it while cleaning one of Jesse's guns and Bob Ford decided to take credit for it." Do you see how ridiculous this kind of speculation is?

It's as simple as this: if Bob Ford was a coward, then so was Jesse James. If Jesse James wasn't a coward, then neither was Bob Ford.


http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

Incredibly well said, Samoan. I can't believe the argument they were trying to make. You can't pick and choose which facts and theories should be presentable in an argument.

That's not opinion, that's science. And science is one cold hearted bitch with a 14 inch strap on!

reply

i am talking about our own soldiers who gang raped and burned an underage girla live to cover it up in iraq or afganistan. you probly dont want to admit to knowing about it because like alot of people, they just want to ignore it when its our own soldiers doing bad things

reply

Not sure what that has to do with this discussion.

http://www.facebook.com/scarletworm

http://facebook.com/davidlambertart

reply

southgeorgiagirl, you just need to stop pushing a bad argument.

As Samoan Bob put very clearly, any rationale you use to call Ford a coward can also be applied to James. Probably can be applied even more accurately to James.


And I'm sorry. I don't buy the "war makes you do crazy things" line. That doesn't justify anything, or make it ok to kill innocent people, including children.

reply

There is some history cited that:

The Fords were outlaws who turned on Jesse first to collect bounty and to be pardoned (Bob) if he would assassinate Jesse for the governor.

After Jesse's murder, both Fords were tried for the murder, convicted, and then rapidly pardoned (what a set-up), and he and his brother barely got any dollars for the bounty from the governor.

So, Bob Ford was a criminal who was hired by the governor to assassinate James.

And, James had to have had some trust left in the brothers to have left himself so open to be killed in the manner in which he was.

Say what you want about Jesse, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the governor was crooked and Ford was a rat and scoundrel.

Even a police officer tasked with the duty to catch a criminal would have a hard time explaining shooting an unarmed criminal in the back and when the man's wife and children were present in the home.

For all we know, the governor had a hand in Ford's assassination. There had been attempts made on Ford's life prior to his death (Ford was only 30 when he was killed), ostensibly because he was 'so hated' by many folks for how he had killed James, but the governor already had dirty hands, so maybe he just took advantage of that to finally have Ford offed.

Dirty dealing all around.




"I'm here because I believe in a free Narnia."

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Jesse shot and killed unarmed men in the back all through his career, oh yeah, but Ford is the *beep* coward right? Did you miss the scene where Jesse beats a man unconscious then prepares to shoot him in the back of the head?

The guy was a grade A a psycho. You get those kinds anyway you can - your *beep* code only exists in john wayne movies. It's a code Jesse certainly didn't follow, don't see why ford had to either.
The whole point of the film is that there is no heroics or romantic violence. It's all inglorious, messy and to people who have no *beep* idea what they are talking about "cowardly". It's why Jesse's "cowardly" murders were glorified by the population high on nickle books and outlaw worship, and Ford, who recounted his assassination honestly, was vilified.

I find it hilarious that you believe a man who bullied, beat and murdered innocent people through his career somehow deserved an honorable standoff when justice finally came knocking on his door.

You demonstrate the EXACT phenomenon of outlaw worship, hypocrisy and violence romanticism that the film is exploring. Congratulations lab rat.

"World needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door"

reply

What pisses me off more is when people say Bob was a coward for shooting Wood Hite.

Wood Hite was planning a sneak attack on 3 sleeping, unaware, and potentially unarmed men. Wood was the coward in that situation. And if you start a gunfight with 3 guys, expect more than one of them to shoot back.

reply

In the film Hite didn't realize Liddil was upstairs until well after he'd sat down i nthe farmhouse. When he has the epiphany, eh barges upstairs. The fact he pauses at the door suggests to me that he realizes Liddel has been alerted and is probably waiting on the other side of the door. Hite wasn't planning on killing either of the Ford brothers- Charley bales out the window because bullets are flying everywhere.
That said i don't think there is anything cowardly about killing a man who is about to murder another simply because he had a tumble with his step mother.

What amazes me is how much the clear parallels they are drawing goes over peoples heads- the one person Jesse kills on screen, he shoots in the back. Sheriff Timberlake warns Ford specifically "don't let James get behind you"- knowing his MO and that that is exactly when Jesse would strike. And yet, people watch the movie and take the same hypocritical stance towards Ford that the public did at the time.

Everyone laughs that Ford doesn't have the "ingredients" to be a killer- but in the end, when it comes to killing, the only real difference is that Jesse is, by his own admission, "gregarious"- they both murder people at the opportune moment, with a bullet to the back.

"World needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door"

reply

Is having a tank go around a couple of men on a battlefield not cowardly? Is having a drone fire a missile from 5,000 feet up not cowardly? Whatever, he shot and thief and a killer.

reply

As far as I'm concerned, this notion of cowardice vs. honor etc., in life and death situations is irrelevant. I'm gonna survive by whatever means necessary. Fighting "fair" is a great way to see the inside of a body bag.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply