Monroe Hutchens Vs. Uri Boyka

If it is JUST boxing and no kicks, head butts, knees, elbows or wrestling/grappling moves are allowed then Boyka loses to any world class boxer unless he is in a very low weight division, Chambers beat him at boxing almost effortlessly.

However, in a no holds barred fight Monroe Hutchins loses because he is JUST a boxer. Lets face it, some loser who earned his black belt in some generic 3rd rate karate school in a mini mall somewhere will get owned by a good boxer but that does not apply when you are one of the best mixed martial artists in the world.

Same was true for Bruce Lee, you put him against George Forman or Mohammid Ali or (if the timing had been different) Mike Tyson in a boxing match specifically then the Boxer wins easily but in a street fight the boxer gets killed.

A better question is who would win between Monroe and Boyka IF Monroe got a major crash course in MMA like Chambers did.

How important is size/weight divisions? Because although he managed to beat Chambers Monroe was smaller and the underdog and that might make beating Boyka in anything other than a boxing match tough.