MovieChat Forums > Undisputed II: Last Man Standing (2007) Discussion > Martial Artist Vs Professional Boxer ?

Martial Artist Vs Professional Boxer ?


There is no such think as "it is impossible", but we have to make an exception in this case because there is no way that a pro boxer can defeat a good martial artist. No Way !!!!!

reply

You mean in a street fight, where everything goes, or in the ring?

"Enjoy yourself -- every day above ground is a good day."


reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

one of the beefs i had with this movie is a boxer being taught diff mix martial arts techniques wouldnt pick up on it as fast as he did. even before i knew michael jai white had several blk belts its obvious in the movie he was trained in diff arts. not to mention in the first fight half the techniques he used wasnt boxing.

reply

I don't like to compare styles anymore because it really depends on who fighting. Like for instance if it was Jet Li versus Floyd Mayweather. I go with old Floyd But if it was Donnie Yen versus Oscar de la Hoya I'd say Donnie Yen. See where I'm going with this. I've seen people with no Martial arts training what so ever beat so called black belts and I seen black belts Kick the s h i t out of wreslters. Certain people won't be as good in Taekwondo as they would be in Boxing and certain people wouldn't be as good Boxing as they would be in Taekwondo? It depends on the personality of the fighter and how he uses his knowledge and skill.

Honor is not in the weapon. Its in the man. -Jin Ke

reply

[deleted]

Fighting is about knowledge, yes. To a certain degree.

It's also about attitude, fitness and instincts (trained or natural), relaxation and adapting your technique.

Wing tsun has about 20 techniques, you can learn them in a year and spend another 20 year to learn to adapt them to every situation you can think of. That's adaptation...

Bar fights has nothing to do with fighting. As you say that's mostly about wavering around with your arms.

Boxing is also a martial art, just not as stylish as what people usually mean by martial arts.
Some fancy kung fu-styles are just beutiful to watch and useless in a fight.

Boxers tend to do more damage and be able to take more damage than most of the more fancy styles. So does kick-boxers and other full contact styles.

If you never train with power in yout techniques they will be useless in a real fight. Styles with techniques that do too much damage to be traind with power usually looses in a real fight. Try learning to drive a car by never moving it, you now everything to do exceptionally well but can you coordinate it all your first time in traffic?

Kicking is useless if your opponent does not stay at a kicking distance. Keeping yout opponent at kicking distance is very, very hard if he does not want to and his attitude really is to kick your ass.

Grappling is great against one single opponent. Vs multiple opponents you really don't want to get on the ground.
Grappling is great to keep your opponent from striking you, since you usually keep him so close. Of course you need to be able to keep him close for that...

I've done a few years each of shaolin style kung fu, wing chun (slightly diffrent branch than wing tsun), savate, boxing and ju-jitsu (grappling oriented and "ordinary"). No style of those is ultimate compared to the others. Any one of them would loose to any other of them if you can not keep your opponent at the prefered distance. Any one of them can beat any other of them if you either keep your opponent at the prefered distance or are able to adapt to other distances.

This style vs that style is useless. It how you learn it, how you use it, how you adapt it and how you train as a fighter that matters.

The general black belt does not fight as a profession. A professional boxer do. The pro boxer is a trained fighter. The general black belt is martial artist for whom the style means more than the fight. Some general black belts sadly does not realise that difference themselves.

Most successfull professional fighters today are mma, mixed martial artists. They learn to box, kick, wrestle and grapple. I'm not counting style specialist fights here (pure boxing rules, grappling rules etc) but fights as in you do what is needed within certain rules (as in you wear standard protection, no biting etc) like K1 and the likes.

reply

true but ive always wondered if one is experienced in grappling and takes the fight to the ground there at harm of cutting themselves. How many times have you been in a nightclub where the ground has broken glass from bottles and pint glasses, it would be dangerous taking a fight to the ground especailly if your fighting more than one person, who can stamp on you making it hard to get back up.

reply

You ever been in (or seen) a pub brawl? They are nasty, violent affairs that happen so quickly that most of the time you will never see it coming. Drunks are not the slow retards you make them out to be. Anyone fuelled on alcohol and armed with a glass/bottle/chair/whatever is deadlier than any 10th degree black belt.

reply

[deleted]

I know American Boxing, Tae Kwon Do, some roman-grecco, and I'm working to learn some Krav Maga, Ju Jitsu, and Kali Knife fighting...

Anyway, I've been in several street fights and im 12-0 9ko in my boxing record (AM), I have never gone to the ground in any of the street fights. I ussualy boxed and stayed in and hit areas like the throat, sternum, groin, knees, etc. I did use soem elbows and headbuts. But I always tried to avoid the chin in a street fight, nothing worse then getting some kinda infection from a drunk or a junkie's dirty mouth.

Street Fighting sucks and you sould always try to end it standing up if possible. If they kick dodge or kick under their legs, etc. I know, I know, most plans go out the window when you get hit, but sparring helps that. Muscle memory is the most important.

reply

You must be a guy who loves to pick fights in bars. I've never been in a bar fight myself, but came pretty close, and I have seen bar fights in action. Most of the time it's random punching, lunging at the other guy, and it usually goes to the ground. A seasoned, street-tested, trained fighter/killer would kill some average joe tough guy in a barroom setting, especially those MMA guys. They have complete control over their body and are trained to deal with situations like that, randon attacks, weapons, blitzing, etc. You pick a fight with the wrong person, let's say Chuck Zito, and he will literally rip the nose off your very face and leave you there to bleed to death. Unless of course, someone intervenes and calls 911.

reply

You must be a guy who loves to pick fights in bars. I've never been in a bar fight myself, but came pretty close, and I have seen bar fights in action. Most of the time it's random punching, lunging at the other guy, and it usually goes to the ground. A seasoned, street-tested, trained fighter/killer would kill some average joe tough guy in a barroom setting, especially those MMA guys. They have complete control over their body and are trained to deal with situations like that, randon attacks, weapons, blitzing, etc. You pick a fight with the wrong person, let's say Chuck Zito, and he will literally rip the nose off your very face and leave you there to bleed to death. Unless of course, someone intervenes and calls 911.

reply

Very true.
When I was a bouncer at the Hogs & Heffer bar here in Greenwich Village, I had to watch several brawls break out. One night, a hipster *beep* was harassing one of the waitresses. It got so bad, that the head bouncer came over and got in his face.

The hipster pushed him back and went into what seemed to be a TKD stance. He was goading the bouncer into attacking him. However, there wasnt enough room. The hipster *beep* swung his leg and accidentally kicked someone to his side. In that moment, the bouncer pounced on him and beat him to kingdom come.

So the lesson is, there is no one good style. It all depends on the situation and location.

reply

finally someone with SOMETHING to say. i go with my man Ross Enamait go on his site and read what he says about some 'martial artists'.

reply

I don't like to compare styles anymore because it really depends on who fighting. Like for instance if it was Jet Li versus Floyd Mayweather. I go with old Floyd But if it was Donnie Yen versus Oscar de la Hoya I'd say Donnie Yen. See where I'm going with this. I've seen people with no Martial arts training what so ever beat so called black belts and I seen black belts Kick the s h i t out of wreslters. Certain people won't be as good in Taekwondo as they would be in Boxing and certain people wouldn't be as good Boxing as they would be in Taekwondo? It depends on the personality of the fighter and how he uses his knowledge and skill.


You actually think Mayweather could beat Jet Li in a "all or nothing" fight? Do you even watch boxing? Only people Mayweather actually beats down are shills and women. He wins fights with his defense and use of the ring.

I honestly think Ronda Rousey would have a chance against him (Mayweather) in an "all or nothing" fight. Boxing is boxing. Martial arts where you can grapple, kick and knee, aside from punching, are a whole other ball game.

reply

Utter BS. A pro boxer has the tools to take out any martial artist. I just saw Butterbean, a former pro boxer, beat the crap out of his opponent using only his fists in a K1 match. And let's not forget K1 newcomers like Bob Sap, beating the most seasoned pro's using only his fists.
Even lightweight kickboxing matches have a rule that they must kick at least 5 times during a round so it won't look like a boxing match. Some kick 5 times pro forma and continue to box. Why is that you think? Not to diss martial arts, they do offer extra techniques and options, but a good boxer that doesn't need it can perfectly do without.

reply

Yeah, and you some how missed Genki Sudo ripping his leg apart.
Nice.

Idiot

reply

hahah I LOVED that fight!

reply

Utter BS. A pro boxer has the tools to take out any martial artist. I just saw Butterbean, a former pro boxer, beat the crap out of his opponent using only his fists in a K1 match. And let's not forget K1 newcomers like Bob Sap, beating the most seasoned pro's using only his fists.
Even lightweight kickboxing matches have a rule that they must kick at least 5 times during a round so it won't look like a boxing match. Some kick 5 times pro forma and continue to box. Why is that you think? Not to diss martial arts, they do offer extra techniques and options, but a good boxer that doesn't need it can perfectly do without.

reply

[deleted]

Black belts mean nothing. The average amateur boxer would wipe the floor of most black belts.

It comes down to the art. Arts that have been proven to be effective in MMA matches are those that are hands on, such as wrestling, muay thai, boxing, kickboxing, judo, bjj etc. Arts that practices on resisting opponents at full strength & pace. Arts that makes you learn kata's, punch air for 30minutes and score points by touching each other or be disqualified for hitting hard dont do too well. I knew national karate & taekwondo champs who really couldnt fight for crap...Ive had black belts who tell me themselves that they dont use it in a real fight cos the adrenaline throws it all out of the window. Fighters like wrestlers and boxers are used to being hit, used to defending themselves from risk of being KTFO so when they get in the street fight...its like second nature to them.

Boxing is easily the best fist art out there...if you watch MMA all of them have some sort of boxing background, wether its from boxing, muay thai or kickboxing. In kickboxing fights they may not kick much but I dont think the use of the kicks is all that important, it is defence and awareness of the kick. When I first entered into a muay thai gym, I didnt know how to defend against it so they could have broken my leg at will. Defense against kicks sounds simple but its an art and needs to be nurtured, just like defense against punches.

reply

Arts that makes you learn kata's, punch air for 30minutes and score points by touching each other or be disqualified for hitting hard dont do too well.

-------------------------------------------

Otherwise they'd be knocking each other senseless. Let's not be thick here in order to win some kind of karate knowledege war.

Boxing has it's limitations and once you block a boxers puches they are completely vunerable to virtually anything. All you have to do is trap one arm and sweep the legs from underneath them.

I've been in fights with guys who think they are tough, just wait for the punches, move and tie them up. Too easy lol. Anyway, most of them are drunk and aren't trained.

reply

I'm with Marvrealdeal. Allthough I have to say that it is easier for a boxer to learn to defend kicks from a kickboxer or martial artist, than it is for kickers to learn to defend against a boxers punches. Boxing is the most scientific of all fight sports, you rarely see professional boxers make mistakes; if they lose, it's simply because the otherone is better. There is hardly any risk taking in boxing. In kickboxing you'll more often see the fighters take risks and launch attacks that could go very wrong for the attacker. Also, people overestimate the range a kickboxer has with his legs; you'll have to be standing reasonably close to an opponent to do proper damage with your legs. So if you want to kick and do damage, you are allready in a boxers range and he can do some serious damage. And don't get me started on Kung Fu; They have ineffective stances, are defensively weak and don't have the power to win. If you put Bruce Lee against Ramon Dekker, Bruce would get his ass kicked so hard he'd finally have a good reason to make those stupid noises.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

Bruce Lee incorporated Western Boxing into his own style. In fact Bruce Lee upset some 'masters' because he only believed in taking the effective bits of each style. For example , his high kicks were only for film, he wouldnt use them in a real tough fight. Also Bruce lee was close friends with Gene Lebelle.

You'd be stupid to judge Bruce lee on his film martial arts.

Bruce studied Western Boxing, Wrestling and saw value in Weight Training.

reply

I agree with ydrol. Bruce Lee created the first steps of mix martial arts. He did what other people thought was wrong. He took effective moves and techniques from different styles and made it work for him. He doesn't limit himself to one style and one of his philosophy is to take in what works for you and discard the ones that doesn't. Also Harrythebastard you said that "you'll have to be standing reasonably close to an opponent to do proper damage with your legs." Well, Bruce was able to break a 150lb bag with a sidekick. A sidekick, which is the kick with the longest range.

reply

[deleted]

I can see your point up until you mention Bruce Lee.

Let's not forget that he was more than just an actor. James Coburn talked about his time training with Lee in Hong Kong where martial artists of all manner would constantly be challenging Lee in the streets. His words were "These guys were trying to KILL him... and they never had a chance."

Let's also not forget that Bruce Lee's own martial art (Jeet Kun Do) was NOT just Kung Fu. He very specifically talked about incorporating American Boxing, having been inspired by Ali. He most especially enjoyed the footwork.

Ramon Dekker may have an easy time against a general Kung Fu Master, but let's not get silly. Bruce Lee was very much the real deal.

All that being said, I know that I, personally, would be beaten in the first round by ANY pro or amateur boxer, kick-boxer or martial artist.

In the real world, however... as my father often said "It's not a game." I was never trained to punch for the face. You go for the throat, ears, solar plexus or knees, you break any limb you get a hold of and you don't stop until they're dead. It saved my life a couple of times, and fortunately has come up VERY seldom.

reply

Yes but dont forget that Butterbean also got beaten by 150lb Genki Sudo, as well as, other much smaller fighters. And dont even get mention Bob Sapp, He has been beaten soley due to leg strikes.
A while back some kickboxing federation, I believe K-1, sponsered fights between their kickboxers and professional boxers. Needless to say the kickboxers clearly dominated their boxing counterparts.
Not to say that boxing is useless, I train in boxing myslef, it is just inadequate in more full contact matches. However both kickboxing and boxing lack the ground skills necessary in a true street fight. Any decently trained wrestler can take down and manipulate most people, they may not be able to inflict as much damage as a striker but they can dominate most fights.

reply

There's a great video on youtube of King Arthur Williams facing a kickboxer. Williams does fine....for the first 5 seconds. Literally 7 seconds into the fight, a good leg kick sends him down. He barely even got a punch in because his opponent kept doing leg kicks. It goes to show, not that boxing is weak, but that it is limited training. Kickboxers toughen their legs to withstand such kicks, and even if they are not good wrestlers or submission artists, great MMA fighters like George St. Pierre and Chuck Liddell have outstanding takedown defense.

So, I think a boxer could beat a martial artist, if they are familiar with what techniques the martial artist is going to use and how to counter them. You don't need to use more than your hands if you can take away everything else the other person is doing. A boxer could train in how to defend against kicks, knees, wrestling, jujitsu, etc. and not need to know how to actually do it. But doing pure boxing training, I don't think it's gonna happen.

reply

YES! iv done martial arts for years and i will say comparing a martial artist with a boxer is like a bacteria with a T-rex. martial arts has millions of patterns using BOTH arms legs. boxing you dont use your legs and your only allowed certain points to hit.Also martial artist are better movers and have better focus. so yes martial artist have the advantage dramaticly

reply

Most boxers CAN beat most martial artist because most martial artists learn how to SPAR and boxers learn how to FIGHT. Martial arts has become a business for the most part, if somone gets hit hard, everything stops and the Hitter gets blamed. They never learn to fight through pain or take someone out unmercifully. Fighting is not pretty but most Martial Arts are just that. However MMA fighters are different and a minority. By the way, Jet Li or Donnie Yen are FORMS champions they don't and have never learned to fight. It's like putting a prized Greyhound in a dog fight, it's not what they do.

reply

i heard about butterbean beating the K1 guy. i think i depends on the fighter. there are some boxers that are very good on the feet and can get in and out. i really think it comes down to who uses there style the best. the easiest way to explain this would be to think about a boxer fighting a wrestler. if the boxer can move around and use his jab to set something up he'll most likey be sucessful. on the other hand if the wrestler can get under the boxer shots and grab his legs than the wresler will most like be sucessful.


i would love to see some really good boxer like mayweather and shane mosely fight some exibitions against the some really good martial arts guys.

reply

It all depends on the situation if it is a street fight the martial artist if trained correctly will win against the boxer. Boxers are trained to one discipline and that's stand up striking with only punches. Most martial artists are well rounded with stand up striking with punches and kicks, and ground fighting skills. That is why boxing isn't as big of a sport anymore compared to mixed martial arts (MMA) I know because I train in mixed martial arts, 95% of all street fights end up on the ground. Boxers have no clue what to do on the ground because they are not trained to. In my opinion there is no style better than one other you have to train in multiple styles to better your techniques. I recommend Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Wrestling, Muay Thai Kick Boxing, and any tradition form of Martial Arts. All help make you a better well round fighter.

reply

I think we should make a difference between traditional martial arts (kung fu, karate etc.)and MMA (people trained in multiple diciplines)

Traditional martial arts fighters would lose both inside and outside the ring against both MMA's and boxers.

In the ring (boxer vs. MMA) I would go for 60% to 40% in favour of the boxer if kickboxing rules apply.

In a cage fight or street fight I would go 80% for the MMA against 20% for the boxer.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

I know a lot of martial arts people, eg: various blackbelts, and one guy who represented the British team at the Olympics in 76, blackbelts are blackbelts for a reason - they are hard! I've seen Cynthia Rothrock perform and trust me guys, you wouldn't want to mess with her - I assure you, and she was a forms champions as well as Jet Li - infact she holds 5 blackbelts, and used to compete with and beat Men in competition. When she competed, there were no womens tournaments. thus she went against the men. Her kicks and punches are very powerful, and her timing is near perfect.

Infact I wouldn't mess with even an intermediate belt holder - no way. Generally, when people say "yeah martial artists just spar" they clearly don't know what they are on about.







reply

In the ring a boxer without a shadow of a doubt.

Outside? All the above is bollox tbh, fighting on the street comes down to one thing and one thing only, who is the most viscious, you want proof? Watch any of the "full contact" cage fights, the most skillful martial artists in the world still get there arses kicked by some 5 foot nothing savage little ape who's too stupid to know he should lose. Remember school? Each playground had a nasty little bugger that no-one messed with, not because he was big or hard but because he was willing to go a step further than anyone else around.

reply

For striking arts, Muay thai is incredibly effective. Muay thai fighters are good with their fists, but if you put them in a fist fight with a boxer. The boxer wins, a muay thai fighter's fists are not nearly advanced as the boxer. In a street fight, the muay thai fighter has the advantage. A boxer knows how to use his elbows to strike, it's not just the fists. Throw a left hook bring it through all the way and you can clip the elbow off the chin or body, same with the uppercut. Boxing is not just fists, if the entire upper body you can use to attack someone.

Still I think muay thai is the most effective striking art. I'm an amateur boxer and know full well of the potential of the martial art of it. But still i think Muay Thai is more effective and versatile in a street fight.

A boxer with a good high school styled wrestling background behind him (most importantly sprawling) is no easy opponent in a street fight.

reply

Just saw clips from youtube and Aikido beats all other martial arts.

First fight was with a Taekwondo black belt, he basically got stuffed.

2nd was against Aikido Vs KickBoxing, he got stuffed too.

3rd was with some Muay Thai fighter, that was even funnier, as he got taken to the ground at every opportunity. Another fight against 4 others, and the aikido bloke just trashed them all.

But the best was a Ju-Jitsu bloke and he just got killed and made to look very silly.

Check them out. Aikido beats everything you can think of - it's true.

Boxing, well I dunno about that, but I can imagine what would happen.

Boxing is pretty useless, unless you can knock someone out quickly, and considering nearly every martial art uses long range techniques, I can see a boxer getting either taken down to the floor, or kicked to death. But having seen this aikido, I have to admit nothing can beat it.

It's got too many locks, sweeps and parrying type moves for anything to counter it. This karate guy was kicking the other guy, who simple parried him, locked him up and took him to the ground, or threw him like a rag doll.

I'm stunned how effective it was and how effortless it seemed - but I bet it's not. Still, it beats everything.

Sorry boxers!

reply

[deleted]

Is boxing not a martial art? Why should one associate martial arts to "gi's" and belts? To me both boxing and wrestling (which is considered the oldest martial art) are martial arts, that rely on techniques and physics, as against brute strength. Now no one can disagree with the last statement, or else we'd see hulking goliaths on steroids win boxing and wrestling competitions every time.

reply

did i ever say boxing was not a martial art? strength does make a difference in boxing and wrestling my friend. Steroid, actually hurt you in boxing, all that extra weight and muscle hurts your speed, and slows you down.

reply

You should watch Fight Science, a documentary about martial arts. The most effective punch is from a professional boxer. You can practice many different styles an be a very good fighter or try to master only one. The only thing that matters is practice. Practice makes perfect! Hard training transform the body to become a deadly weapon.

reply

It's an impossible question to answer. There are too many variables left out of the question for anyone to give a definitive answer. Are you saying the current #1 martial artist in the world against the current #1 professional boxer in the world? And although you might be able to say who is the #1 professional boxer in the world, there is no way to determine who is the #1 martial artist in the world. How big/small is the pro boxer in relation to how big/small the martial artist is? Is it a bar fight, where both are intoxicated...or is it a sanctioned/regulated fight in a ring with rules? If it's an event with rules, do those rules favor the boxer(straight up boxing w/ mandatory 8 or 12 ounce gloves and nothing else goes)...or do they favor the martial artist(punching, kicking, elbowing, kneeing, choking, striking in the testicles, eye gauging, fish hooking, mutilating, etc. is all allowed). As you can see, the list goes on and on when asking this broad of a question. And in my opinion, WHO is doing the boxing/WHO is doing the martial art carries the greatest weight of all when answering that question. Take Football as an example...i can teach anyone the best techniques in how to throw/catch/kick a football, yet the vast majority of those people will never play in the NFL. This applies to boxing/martial arts as well. The individual is the most important variable, which is the reason why they have the boxing matches and the mma matches. Put a boxer and a martial artist in front of each other on any given night, and let them fight, and you'll get a definitive answer...just don't be surprised if you see the exact opposite result the following night!

reply

I don't think boxing comes under the Martial Arts tag. Martial means 'fighting', and I know boxing is fighting, but it's not recognised as one of the arts.

The martial arts community probably doesn't recognise it as having enough skill maybe.

Martial arts is a 'system' of learning. Most arts have 6 belts that give a kind of indication of skill level, and it's more of a mastery and learning of techniques, and thus much more skilled than hitting a heavy bag or speed ball.

Boxing does have some skill, but little compared to the grading syllabus of even a Yellow belt 9th kyu. Basically boxers train to knock someone senseless, so they don't get up, and thus win the fight - it's a sport and not an art.

Boxing is entertainment, more akin to that of ancient Gladiators wacking the heck out of each other. The martial arts are very spiritual and have customs, there is little of that in a thugish sport.

That's why it's not accepted.

reply