MovieChat Forums > Undisputed II: Last Man Standing (2007) Discussion > Was this supposed to be a sequel?

Was this supposed to be a sequel?

posted 16 years ago by sgreen4
6 replies | jump to latest

Did the makers of this movie even watch the first movie? They should have just called this movie 'Prision Boxer' or something else because it is nothing like 'Undisputed'. The George Chambers character is completely changed from the first movie. He body type is different, his personality is wrong and his fighting style has changed drastically. No one calls him Iceman. Does anyone remember the first movie? George Chambers was bald! In the start of this movie , George was doing a commercial in Russia because he needed the money? WTF?! At the end of the first movie, George was back on top again.

And why does everyone speak English in this movie? That is one thing I don't get.

[–] Ze_Germanizer 16 years ago

Yes it's a sequel and yes they speak English.

So what? It's not The Godfather........

----
I love my mirror.

[–] Mr_Gray 14 years ago

I clearly remember that Chambers had "ICEMAN" tatooed on his back in the 1st movie. In the sequel all his tatoos are gone.

[–] ericthered01 13 years ago

Also I noticed that Chambers was played by a totally different actor! Wow! Sorry just wanted to point out something obvious as well.

[–] do-bye 12 years ago

it is very different!!!

"Peace and love"

[–] scabab 10 years ago

If anything it's a prequel because in the original he'd had 40 something fights while here he'd had 30 something fights. After all White does look younger and does have hair.

Really though I see it as a remake more than anything.

[–] creatorof2002 8 years ago

As far as I am concerned its a REMAKE and that is how I think of it, its basically the "Boyka Trilogy" where he goes from being villain to hero.