Mickey Roarke steals this movie
I am so glad he's back. His portrayal was as sinister & substantial as it needed to be. This is one great actor. I look for his movies, & enjoy every performance.
shareI am so glad he's back. His portrayal was as sinister & substantial as it needed to be. This is one great actor. I look for his movies, & enjoy every performance.
shareAgreed. He carried the whole thing. The scenes with Diane Lane and Thomas Jane were boring. Just filler. They were almost the McGuffin...
shareI agree, Lane seemed a little misplaced at times and Jane did with the role what he could. At times it felt like he was reaching for something that wasn't there...as if his character was trying to dig into what was left over from The Punisher.
Rourke and Levitt were spot-on, though. Rourke really did steal the show.
Agreed. It's one of his best.
shareI agree. He totally owned this movie. The scenes were quite lacklustre until he was on screen.
--------------------
The memories of a man in his old age are the deeds of a man in his prime
Mickey is the perfect psycho. JGL wasn't bad, too.
"Some films are slices of life. Mine are slices of cake." - A. Hitchcock
At what point did Rourke steal the show? When he was half asleep through the whole thing or when he just stood around? If anything, this felt more like JGL's movie
"What a coincidence, I hate me too"
Go Sox
Agreed. He killed it, so to speak. Rourke is one helluva an actor.
shareCanĀ“t be more agree with the OP!
Prostitute: What the *beep* are you doing?
Johnny: I'm gonna kill a bunch of people.
Mickey stole it by just been Mickey. Mickey doesnt act he just does what he does like Brando.
share