Ugh


Let me preface this by saying I am a Chris Evans fan. But ... This was torture. Yeah there was plot and chemistry. And a few cute moments thrown in, but the amount of dialogue in this movie is over bearing. Sometimes just sometimes directors writers whomever need to remember to just let a film breathe. It reminded me of all of the Kevin smith movies where the entire film is an ode to how clever his writing is. Look at me I can write witty dialogue that is over verbose and shows I have an IQ greater than 75. Congrats you're officially average. And that's what this movie is ... Average.

reply

haha It was conplete torture !!

reply

The 7.0 rating pulled me towards this, just shows you really can't trust these ratings! Might start checking out the lower ratings it could me my taste!

reply

I would give it a double "Ugh"...if you're not sure if that's better or worse, the "Ugh" scale is the inverse of the IMDB rating scale.

reply

*beep* all that. All that dialogue in the film says they really talked about a lot and got to know each other in a single night. I don't like a lot of talking either but damn if that's what yal complaining about and critiquing you really didn't get the movie.

reply

1. Learn English
2. The movie sucked for a lot of reasons if it has a 31 metascore.

reply

You know Ebonics? How bout this Suck a D! The movie was great. Especially for Chris's first movie as a director.

reply

The best films are mainly about showing, not telling. That is one of the first things a student learns about narrative writing and filmmaking.

Lengthy dialogue and verbose exposition is better suited for a good book; it must be balanced in that format as well. The story in a novel allows more time to delve into the minds and motivations of the characters...without the limits imposed by the average 90-120 minutes of screen time.

In film, conversational dialogue should never feel tedious. However, it should reveal characters and consistently move the story forward.



"Don't get chumpatized!" - The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters (2007)

reply

This is the best comment I have ever seen on IMDB

reply

DITTO! Jordangloria, please give yourself a time out...

reply

I hope students also learn about the best films in history. 
For example: "12 Angry Men".* 
There you can find not only verbose dialogues but also a permanent, solemn setting, yet it is never monotonous. 
In Evan's film the sceneries change frequently hinting adventure but never imposing it. The next twist may be behind the corner, but it doesn't happen and the dice rolls over again. Yet things flow normally. The two protagonists are normal people, so they're different, unbalanced, and the dialogues pour out their souls.  This film is about self discovery as Igmar Bergman's "Scenes from a Marriage".

* about 12 Angry Men: "The film is today viewed as a classic, highly regarded from both a critical and popular viewpoint: Roger Ebert listed it as one of his "Great Movies".[17] The American Film Institute named Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, 28th in a list of the 50 greatest movie heroes of the 20th century. AFI also named 12 Angry Men the 42nd most inspiring film, the 88th most heart-pounding film and the 87th best film of the past hundred years. The film was also nominated for the 100 movies list in 1998.[18] As of January 2015, the film holds a 100% approval rating on the review aggregate website Rotten Tomatoes.[19] In 2011, the film was the second most screened film in secondary schools in the United Kingdom." (Wikipedia)

reply

Dialogues as in Igmar Bergman's "Scenes from a Marriage": intimate and realistic style.

reply

Yes ugh you said it. I couldn't have said it better myself

reply