MovieChat Forums > The Ten Commandments (2006) Discussion > Where is the phrase '10 Commandments' ac...

Where is the phrase '10 Commandments' actually in the Bible?


I challenge any one to find the exact phrase "10 COMMANDMENTS" in the first 5 books of the Bible. It a'int there folks! It's just another Hollywood false fantasy. The actual phrase Moses used is the first 10 ?????... what? Do you know? And did you know that there were more than just 10? Try over 600! So why does the American Religious-Right go all "nuts" over something that never actually existed? You know the "10 Commandments" statue in the southern USA? Does this mean that they are very clueless or apt religious scholars? What would the Apostle Paul say about thier apparent lack of "accurate knowledge"?

"That is also why we, from the day we heard of it, have not ceased praying for you and asking that you may be filled with the accurate knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual comprehension." — COLOSSIANS 1:9.

I like what Val Kilmer asked as Moses in "The Prince of Egypt" movie: "So everything I thought, everything I am, is a lie?" Look at Hollywood and the "organized religion" unholy alliance today and you'd be pretty much right (no pun intended)? ;->

reply



You've got to be kidding. You don't really think we're going to buy this, do you?

reply

Oh yee of little faith... OK brother take me up on it! Go look.

reply

Try Exodus 34:28

Source : BibleGateway.com

NIV
Moses was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights without eating bread or drinking water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant—the Ten Commandments.

King James Version
And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.

Contemporary English Version
Moses stayed on the mountain with the LORD for forty days and nights, without eating or drinking. And he wrote down the Ten Commandments, the MOST IMPORTANT part of God's agreement with his people. (emphasis mine)

Also, Deuteronomy 4:13

NIV
He declared to you his covenant, the Ten Commandments, which he commanded you to follow and then wrote them on two stone tablets.

KJV
And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone.

CEV
The LORD said he was making an agreement with you, and he told you that your part of the agreement is to obey the Ten Commandments. Then the LORD wrote these Commandments on two flat stones.

And what about Deuteronomy 10:4

NIV
The LORD wrote on these tablets what he had written before, the Ten Commandments he had proclaimed to you on the mountain, out of the fire, on the day of the assembly. And the LORD gave them to me.

KJV
And he wrote on the tables, according to the first writing, the ten commandments, which the LORD spake unto you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly: and the LORD gave them unto me.

CEV
where the LORD wrote the Ten Commandments on them, just as he had done the first time. The commandments were exactly what he had announced from the fire, when you were gathered at the mountain. After the LORD returned the stones to me

Check it if you like, or not...

reply

I note with amusement that "spookysr," like most folks who post just to start a firefight, is not-so-amazingly silent when confronted with proof to the contrary of his claim. No apologizing, for example, or saying, "You're right, I was wrong and have learned something." Of course not.

reply

Because they are losers, who think they know everything but don't know JACK!!!

Spookysr will also ignore this thread now. Because he got B----- slap

reply

Those cites are all translations and not what the Hebrew actually says. Chumash Etz Hayim points out that "The popular English title 'The Ten Commandments' is derived from the traditional, although inaccurate, English rendering of the Hebrew phrase 'aseret ha-d'varim'.... The Hebrew, which means 'The Ten Words/Statements/Pronouncements,' was translated literally into Greek ... as deka logoi. This gave rise to the more accurate English alternative 'Decalogue.'"

It always makes me groan and roll my eyes when people think the Bible was written in English. Get real, folks. If you want to read the Bible, learn Hebrew and Greek.

reply

Those were the Ten that were scribed in stone.

There is a total of 613 positive and negative mitzvot in the Torah.

reply

But the person asked where does it say ten commandments in the bible not the torah. These are what I like to call God's top ten. sure there are more laws but these were the covnat made with moses and the children of Isreal. BTW what do you think the hardest commanment to keep? I belive it is the one of honor thy mother and father. No days you see so many just tossing that one to the waysid. I am 39 and I honor my parents dearly what they say is law they need some thing I try my best to give it to them. Some folks cuss out their parents and argue with them and all kinds of disrepectful stuff it is a shame.

Huggie Bear

reply

OK I went M.I.A. for awhile... No not for those reasons... Just got busy doing sumtin' else...

OK I SCREWED UP - MY BAD! I read your replies. I can see that my challenge was very poorly worded when I said: "I challenge any one to find the exact phrase "10 COMMANDMENTS" in the first 5 books of the Bible." On hindsight I guess I should have been more specific and said CREDIBLE bible translations like the Gutenberg or Tyndale. When I said 1st 5 books of the Bible I was talking about the "original" or the TORAH or Pentateuch and not the Protestant and Catholic "hacked up" versions that exclude the TETRAGRAMMATON (YHWH God's REAL name) and other hack-jobs (like adding the words 10 Commandments?). There are credible modern english translations today that are written in American English and are true to the original forms of translations unlike the hacked up KJV, NIV, DOUAY, and others.

So Garak-8 good try with Exodus 34:28 but I should have said "credible bible translations" and not the ones you chose. Case in point is Mkatzir's and Dsolzman's very well informed comments: "Those cites are all translations and not what the Hebrew actually says. Chumash Etz Hayim points out that "The popular English title 'The Ten Commandments' is derived from the traditional, although inaccurate, English rendering of the Hebrew phrase 'aseret ha-d'varim'.... The Hebrew, which means 'The Ten Words/Statements/Pronouncements,' was translated literally into Greek ... as deka logoi. This gave rise to the more accurate English alternative 'Decalogue.'" It always makes me groan and roll my eyes when people think the Bible was written in English. Get real, folks. If you want to read the Bible, learn Hebrew and Greek."

AND

"Those were the Ten that were scribed in stone. There is a total of 613 positive and negative mitzvot in the Torah."

But Huggie: "But the person asked where does it say ten commandments in the bible not the torah." Uhhhh... You think the Torah is not from the bible??? Hmmmm... Google TORAH my friend...

My overall albeit UNSTATED point was that God's message was more important than the details on how He delivered it to Moses. The American "Christian-Right" IMHO are the most UNINFORMED religious group just short of Fundamentalist-Muslims. They don't read their bibles well... depend on mistranslations and historical inaccuracies... slick TV evangelists... ear-tickler clergyman... false prophets... etc. etc.

So here case in point AGAIN people are lambasting me for something that has not been proven to even exist... namely the phrase 10 COMMANDMENTS does NOT exist in the Bible (i.e. the 66 books and letters by various mostly unrelated inspired writers over centuries starting with Moses). It was "WORDS" or "LAWS" and was as Dsolzman said was over 600 words not just the first 10!

Yes, learning to read Greek and Hebrew is a very difficult start but there are more easier ways like reading credible english translations other than the highly archaic and difficult old english King James Version! So I guess y'all gonna' tell me Jesus ACTUALLY used the Old English words in KJV and not his native tongues like Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Roman (Latin). You'd really be showing your Biblical ignorance if you did... But Reverend Pat Robertson says it's so! Sheeesh!

PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU, SEARCH FOR A BIBLE TRANSLATION YOU CAN ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND. Old English 18th century vocabulary and grammar is alien to most 21st century english speakers. I can not understand how you even know what you are reading...

Oh I forgot most of you depend on TV evangelists and Hollywood bible themed movies to 'splain important critical things to you... Good luck with that!

reply

I tried to used the Gutenberg but I can't read Old English / German so that wasn't any help.

http://prodigi.bl.uk/treasures/gutenberg/pagemax.asp?page=29r&strCopy=K&vol=1

if you wanna try.

And Tyndale was the NT only so that is no help either. So if you don't want to accept the first offical (authorized) English version (KJV) then unless you can pick another version to try that is in ... say English, I am not sure what else to tell you.

P.S. The Latin (so called Roman) were translations done later Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek (in the case of the NT) were the only Origial lagauges.

From the Torah...
Shemot 34:28

28
Vayehi-sham im-HASHEM arba'im yom ve'arba'im lailah lechem lo achal umayim lo shatah vayichtov al-haluchot et divrei habrit aseret hadevarim.

So he was there with HASHEM forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the Covenant, the Ten Commandments.



reply

*I tried to used the Gutenberg but I can't read Old English / German so that wasn't any help.*

So your educational gaps should hinder the pursuit of the ACCURATE truth??? Try an modern English translation of it. You say you can't read OE (Old English) but yet you espouse that the OE-written KJV is the definitive book for all Christendom today? Now that's rich... I challenge any lay-person (no theologians) to claim they understand EVERY confusing Old English KJV verse... There are much better translations today which you CAN'T get totally confused with...

Can you believe that there's misinformed people out there that think that Jesus' words (KJV?) 'suffer the children' means children should suffer!!! Wow now that is really... What is the definition of the KJV word "shambles" or "pottage"? Nope that's wrong! Jesus did not speak in OE as it wasn't invented in His time period yet. So how is the KJV is so Holy to some when most people don't have a clue what some OE words mean? And the clergy is no help as their hidden-agenda is usually self-interest and/or purely monetary... The apostle Paul said we should seek accurate knowledge... The KJV is not as it was translated for a 17th century Old English King NOT us!

reply

Holy *beep* rofl

reply

Yes, this is most certainly true spookysr! We should have stopped at "The Ten Words" or decalogue.

A proper VERB TENSE is missed by most here too. After the Lord says I am your God, the one who saved you from slavery, Ex. 20:2 his people out of gratitude should or shall have no other gods before me. etc. The shall is not imperative (a commandment) but a future indicative, done out of gratitude not obligation.

They are summarized in Deut.6:5, Matt.22:39. "Love the Lord your God with ALL your heart and with ALL your soul and with ALL your mind". (First Table) and Lev. 19:18, Matt. 22:39. "Love your neighbor as yourself". (Second Table)

Now, to anyone who can keep the ALL x 3 I'll give a MILLION DOLLARS! Just reply to me, but if you do I'll call you a liar!


reply

I'm sure it's also the will of God for his people to arrogantly proclaim that their translation/methodology/grammar/whatever is superior to everyone else's too. Cuz that's how the Big Guy operates. And I've no doubt he would be pleased to see people bickering on message boards about minutiae instead of, y'know, being productive believers.

If after two or three posts your point is still unstated, you might wanna think about your own writing instead of the Bible's...

That said, I'm afraid I have to agree that a great deal of American believers are, shall we say, spoiled and uninformed about the faith which they follow. Probably 70% of my Catholic friends cannot explain to me why they celebrate Lent. They just do it because that's what their folks did, that's what came before. That, to me, is cause for more concern than arguing over whether or not the phrase Ten Commandments appears in any so-called credible Biblical translations. What, precisely, is the eternal value of calling them "The Ten Pronouncements" over "The Ten Commandments"? It's bickering and infighting amongst the church over such details that stunts any progress it might hope to make.

reply

Well, Since God COMMANDED us to obay His Law, and since there were Ten laws to follow. We started to call them the TEN COMMANDMENTS. The same reasoning holds true for " the Trinity" (or God the Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit.

reply

[deleted]

Wow spooks man you missed the point. The bible is all God has given us. The words "the Ten Commandments" are in there several times. And all the "over 600 commandments!" you say, fall within one or more of the Ten Commandments God gave to Moses. I don't like getting in fruitless arguements but man, you just gotta put you're logic aside and trust in Him and love Him. Read the NIV version man its good stuff. Anyway just wanted to get my point out there, Jesus loves you and died for you. So try not to think that you are smarter than God, cause he created us, we didn't create him.
Peace,
Travis

reply

nicely put, travis

reply

Wow Travis you totally missed my point didn't you... I too love God and His Son Jesus. I only wanted to point out how the modern day clergy doesn't really, as why would they change His original words. The older more accurate translations NEVER used the word "commandments" it has always been God's "WORDS" which essentially means the same thing. And no ~616 distinct "WORDS" are not part of the first 10 - that's just ridiculous. These were all called the Mosaic Law which Jesus said was no longer in force for true Christians as he made a NEW covenant. Mosaic law is followed by Orthodox Jews (kinda') and misinformed Catholics and Protestants. If they really read their Bibles with understanding (with accurate knowledge as Paul said) they would see that the Mosaic Laws are now just good guidelines for humans today but Jesus wants us to look to His Gospel (i.e. aka Kingdom Good News). The Apostle Paul and others have given true Christians better "rules" to follow in the New Testament (i.e. aka Christian Greek Scriptures). But if you didn't view "proper education" as a simple invective then you would know this...

MY DIATRIBE WAS AGAINST ORGANIZED RELIGION TODAY NOT UNLIKE THE: 19th century's Søren Kierkegaard (Wikipedia Article: http://tinyurl.com/tsyyp )

reply

Jesus was a myth and pretty much all of the Old Testament was a myth. One cannot back any of the bible's events to actually have occurred. There is NO proof. If there is no proof, I for one am not going to abandon logic and reason to jump into the religious fervour of judging everyone.

One day when reason overcomes everything and we use logic and rational first and formost we will be rid of all fundamentalist religious groups and believe me, the world will be a much better place.

reply

[deleted]

"One day when reason overcomes everything and we use logic and rational first and formost we will be rid of all fundamentalist religious groups and believe me, the world will be a much better place. "

By robert-1360

too bad, Robert, that'll probably, most definitely actually, never happen. lol. i'm not to say that i'm imposing religion upon you. I find much that spookysr (or however he spelled his name) to be rubbish. I am Muslim myself, and have done much research in order to fully understand my religion, and just as much research to fully understand the loopholes in others. Sure, you're right Robert, to believe in Logic and Reason. He who casts out logic and reason is blinded by faith. yet he who acknowledges logic and reason, and is able to apply it to his faith in order to understand its truth, is empowered. In Islam, the Qur'an and the Hadiths (quotes and parables of the Prophet Muhammad), contain information that when first looked at seem purely metaphorical, however, when one applies the logic and reason you speak of, they seem much more than just metaphorical, but rather as a truth that is in fact possible. For example, nowhere in any Islamic text does it say that the whole world was flooded during the Prophet Noah's time. In Christianity however, if I'm not wrong, says/implies the flooding of the entire world. Recent findings by Scientists have further provided evidence that only the regions that Noah lived in, and some surrounding regions were flooded, which is very likely and further supports the claims of my religion. However, while researching I have come to find that the Christianity of today, which is based upon the preaching of Paul (Saul as he was called before Christening his own name), is in fact very much different from the Christianity of old. The Christianity we're all familiar with is in fact a combination of the requirements and changes made that were necessary to convert the people Paul came upon in his travels. Early Christians neither ate Pork (as they saw it was a dirty creature that spreads disease), nor drunk wine (as it is a beverage that weakens the mind and spirit and can lead even the most pious astray). They also believed that Jesus was not in fact the son of God, as if he were, then he would in fact be a demigod and therefore his religion would be one of polytheism. He instead was seen as a man, and only a man. Therefore he was only a prophet, and not Son of God.

Now, knowing that, or even just reading that. Go do some research for yourself. Don't read the Bible to find out that information. Read the papers of scholars around the world. On top of that, realize that what I've just said to you is much more logical knowing that pork contains worms which are extremely harmful to the body, and that alcohol is a major factor in crime and deaths. Add to that, how extremely logical and reasonable it is that there is only one God, and that he does not have a son, but rather entrusted a man with the duties of a Prophet, and allowed that man, as he did with Moses before him, the ability to use the power of God to spread his word among a people that could only believe that which they saw in front of their face. That which they knew was divine in aspect was the power of God, which far superceded the trickery of magic. How EXTREMELY logical is that?!? I'm not preaching Islam, though we do believe in the above stated, and I'm not hating Christianity. I'm merely asking you to examine that which you believe. I have been speaking to many recent converts to Islam, and many atheists and agnostics, and have asked them why they've left the respected religion of Christianity, and many have responded with the following: "The priest would say one thing, and then contradict himself wiht another." I'd ask "Give me an example." They would always respond, "He said that there was only one God, but that he was in three forms: The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. How can there be a father and son in one?"

Please, go out and find out for yourself. If you find that I am wrong (and have concrete evidence outside of the Bible and extremely biased text such as that found in the Middle Ages when they considered all who weren't Christians heathen, and used the great religion to rob the foreign peoples of the world), you've only empowered yourself, and improved your knowledge of Christianity.

With Great Knowledge, Comes Great Responsibilities,
-M


----Truth is yours to see. Don't be blind to that which is before you. Learn.----------

reply

I'm baffled by both of you - Robert what forensic evidence to you offer to confirm your specious argument?

Vidaverdad you say you have researched Islam but somehow it has escaped you that the Prophet Muhammed did not hate nor oppose Christianity. Well I suppose it depends if you are studying Sunni or Shi'a sects. I believe and pontificate EARLY 1st century versions of Christianity not this Constantine perverse version today. Mohammed would agree with me as he did not reject Jesus Christ nor Yahweh. He even proposed that ALLAH was just another name for Lord or them. You do know that he claimed he was "convinced" to serve Allah by the Christian angel Gabriel in the cave at Hira don't you?

So explain to me why you are rejecting my last posting? Its not Moslems against Christians you know... These hateful Right-Wing Christian Fundamentalists today are totally wrong and hate your religion because they are blinded followers of misguided clerics like Falwell and Robinson who love to have their ears tickled by them. They don't know it yet but they and their pro-Constantine and pro-Zionist friends are a bit against-Christ (albeit unknowingly)... which is not a good thing with time running out...

reply

Dude, haha, first of all I'm Muslim. Second, you've actually just agreed with me but put it in a disagreeing statement. Maybe you interpreted my post wrong. Today's Christianity has fallen to the dark side (no offense) but it lacks the fundamental teaching of its hey day. Christianity for the first few centuries was the Christianity that protected the muslims who were exiled from Mecca that went to Abyssinia (Ethiopia) which was ruled by a pious and wise King. However, today, Christianity has been used for personal gain. It only started over a millenium ago however. Today, people follow the religion without stopping to look into the logical fallacies and the ridiculous ideals that the Right-Wing Christian Fundamentalists are pushing. Spooksyr, Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) did not reject the existence of Yahweh (Hebrew name for God), nor the prophethood of Jesus. I agree with you totally on almost everything except for the part where you stated that the angel Gabriel was Christian. How can the Angel Gabriel be a religion? haha. There's no need for him to subscribe to a certain religion. Furthermore, the Angel Gabriel (Jibril in Arabic) has in fact been handing out messages from God to all the Messengers (Prophets with books...so to speak, rather a message that was transcribed down) throughout history.

By the way, I'm quite impressed that you're not just another one of those crazy lunatics on IMDB who are so stubborn in their ways, that they reject the truth before their eyes. Nor do they even try to understand or research that which they don't know, or had no reason to know prior to the posts they read.

-M

reply

To be honest spooksyr, I think I meant to disagree with someone else but accidentally put your name in since ur the person who started the topic.

reply

It's on page 238.

reply