"why did they have that guys brother as a hostage/bargaining chip?"
Erm... well, you just answered your own question - they had the guys brother to use as leverage, i.e. you use your special forces skills to kidnap the President or we kill your brother. I dunno, perhaps you are a single child or you hate your brother... but clearly that was a sufficient "bargaining chip".
"Who were the brothers to the Moroccan terrorists?"
Well, one was the person with the skills to do the job, and the other was the "bargaining chip" that was used to get him to do it.
But quite honestly, these things are not relevant - the movie is not about the terrorists or who they are or what their motives are; the President's attitude towards dealing with terrorism, and the pressures within his own office do indeed comprise part of the plot, but the film is essentially just about the events around the attack from different perspectives over the same time scale; we must glean what we can from these various viewpoints and extensive back-stories for all are neither necessary nor possible (due to time constraints). After all, we learned nothing about Anna and mama, did we?
I do agree that Zoe Whatshername was awful though.
"You've got lovely eyes Dee-Dee, never noticed them before, are they real?"
reply
share