I wonder...

I was reading through the different comments some people give about this show and now Im wondering, is there anybody here who:

- Understands this show cannot be compared with Mythbusters.
Mythbusters is about testing myths using science. Sure, they sometimes have fun with it but only as long as it wont stand in the way of busting the myth. Brainiac on the other hand wants to have fun with science and come up with different chemicals to do whatever they feel like doing everytime no matter what.

- Understands this show must be watched as some sort of comedy based on science, with some serious facts on the side, rather than an educational documentary
If they wanted to be a documntary, they would discuss one subject each episode. If they wanted to be a documentary, educated hosts would be more relevant than "good looking" hosts. Example: Mythbusters (but also other documentaries) has educated but some un-attractive hosts. You dont hear me say that jon tickle or richard hammond are attractive, but those are young, smooth hosts, no "professor-types". I know my choice of words could have been better, but you get the idea.