MovieChat Forums > Gracie (2007) Discussion > Misandronystic Rubbish

Misandronystic Rubbish


So along comes yet another reminder to boys that they are not as important, are bad sexist bullies, and their needs and issues are secondary to girls. In this day and age of widespread misandry, nearly 40 years after implementation of The Girl Project by the US Dept of Education, and Title IX we have seen how the results effect boys. Nationally boys score roughly 20 points below girls on standardized tests in reading and writing, and are about even in math and science. The aforementioned is a dramatic decrease since the 1970's, the latter minimal gains. Girls on the other hand have increased dramatically in all subjects. This was not the case pre 1978, in fact it was girls who tested below (but by not as much of a disparity) than boys. It was addressed, but in a way we now know is anti-boy. The feminizaton of public schools cascading effect is clearly seen in the gender disparity in community colleges (natl avg 68% women), undergraduate admissions (58% women), and graduate programs (69% women). For those countries that adopted a policy similar to ours (UK and Australia) the results have been the same. This is not just a movie about a girl doing great, it is a girl doing great at the expense of boys. Reverse the gender roles, i.e. a positive story about a boy triumphing over girls, and this film would never have been made. What I can say is that I don't think the intention of the writers was to give us a real life story and how its symbollic message has had an adverse result, but it will be the vehicle in my home by which we can do that. As a parent, I will have the privilege of telling both my daughter and son why the message and sexist anti-boy tone of this film is not okay. Additionally I can tell them that it is okay for boys to be with just boys sometimes, just as it is for girls.

reply

Don't like girls much huh? So the stats you spew are really showing that there is a positive effect to granting women rights, but you conclude that this is a negative aspect. I have not seen the film though I am well aware it is semi-autobiographical and is about Elizabeth Shue. I doubt that she gets preferential treatment in the film, more than likely the opposite. So to disparage the film by saying that it is about a girl doing great at the expense of boys is I would venture to guess quite a stretch. I think of Rudy about a small young man who makes the Notre Dame squad due to incredible moxy and I gotta think this film has the same elements. No, you are not going to see a lot of films about a man triumphing in a female world, cause guess what? It is still a man's world. Of course, there is always "Blades of Glory" I guess. My guess is you are a Bush Republican that feels a woman's place is in the kitchen or a Muslim. But as a man I say bring it on, Girl Power!

reply

[deleted]

"My guess is you are a Bush Republican that feels a woman's place is in the kitchen..."

Way to generalize. And they let you vote?

reply

[deleted]

And men still get paid more than women do for doing the same work. What's your point? That sexism exists? Of course it does, on both ends. As someone already said in this thread, it's still a man's world, so a movie about a man overcoming obstacles in a woman's world will never be made. Arguing this is like arguing that a movie about an inner-city black kid overcoming the odds and going to college should never be made because it is racist toward caucasians. Equal opportunity is far too new and still very unequal, so stories like these will be sticking around for a very long time.

reply

Lamiastella, I would like to amend what you said about men getting paid for doing the same work as women. Actually men get paid for doing less. I get up get the kids ready for school, fix breakfast, pack lunches or make sure kids have lunch money, get the kids to school either by taking them or ensuring they are on the bus, work 8 hours a day (outside the home), come home, get the kids from the sitter, fix dinner, clean dishes and pots and pans and the kitchen, double check or proofread homework, start/finish laundry, find lost items (including those items my husband has lost), take the trash out, make sure pets are fed (either by reminding kids or feeding them myself), get baths taken, teeth and hair brushed, jammies on, stories read, kids in bed, finish laundry/dishes/finding lost items not found earlier. Take a shower for myself, finish whatever work I need to (for work outside the home)and finally fall into bed.

My husband gets up, takes a sh!t, shaves his face, gets himself dressed, goes to work, comes home, eats dinner, plays on computer or watches tv, takes a sh!t, goes to bed.

My paycheck is actually bigger than his if you only count a 40 hour work week ($25/hr)

If you go by the actual hours I work, I make about $6/hr. My husband makes $20/hr. More money, less work. Equal opportunity my a$$.

reply

Keyates72, the point the previous poster was trying to make was that women, when working in the same employment position as men, get paid less. Last I saw (2004 or 2005 I believe), according to the U.S. census it was women getting paid 76 cents for every dollar earned by men who did the same job. This obviously isn't the case everywhere, that's the national average. Any difficulties in getting your own husband to help around the house, or for that matter the traditional gender roles on house work, isn't accounted for because it's difficult to accurately measure.

reply

Girls do sometimes have more of an academic advantage (I read this in my newspaper). That's not fair. But is it fair that we get paid less? No.

"Hey Chicago, waddaya say? The Cubs are gonna win today!"-Steve Goodman
World Series or Bust '07!

reply

Girls have advantage just till 16 because they develop faster. Boys develop slower but for longer period of time and wipes out this advantage later.

reply

diablok81 - "Any difficulties in getting your own husband to help around the house, or for that matter the traditional gender roles on house work, isn't accounted for because it's difficult to accurately measure" I'm sorry but you need to read keyates72's posting a little more carefully - I think you will see that she measured it VERY accurately.

reply

Hey Keyates72,

If all that you wrote is true, stop complaining on the Internet and speak up and get your husband to pitch in around the house and with the kids. Otherwise, get over it.



"...and I never slice."

reply

I agree. Talk is cheap, actions speak louder.

reply

I think that Keyates 72 has some marital issues.

reply

To keyates72 - well said woman! Are you sure you're not my younger sister? She works like a slave also and I keep telling her to get assertive. I'm a guy by the way and I totally agree with you. Any woman who is a wife/mother and goes to work outside the home has three full-time jobs! No guy could even begin to cope. You GO GIRL! Equality my A$$

reply

I think women makes slaves from themselves by own will. For example I need just 2 minutes to cook rice: measure, throw into bowl add some spices, go to play on internet for 14 minutes, turn off gas, go to play on internet for 14 minutes, eat while watching TV at same time. To do laundry it takes also no more that 2-5 minutes: throw into washer, go to watch TV for 40 minutes, take out clothes and spend 3-4 minutes to hang them.

Women in other case goes to kitchen and spends two hours there with same results. If she don't have anything to do she takes hover or rag and starts to clean things which are not dirty. After task is finished she starts to arrange things in the house and performs other useless tasks. So three full-time jobs my A$$

reply

[deleted]

Man are physically stronger, more aggressive, not afraid to take more risks and likes to play intense FPS games. All this makes man more competitive. Women usually retreats in risky situations it is why we don't see many women in army, politics (and don't blame men, because you have more votes) or offering new mind blowing but risky business decisions. In very many cases this is the reason why man gets bigger pay check for same job title.

reply

[deleted]

Women get paid less for doing the same job not because they're not as good at doing their job as their male counterparts, but because they're not as dependable.

Face it, women on average miss more time from work than men. I'm not trying to be sexist here, but it’s the truth. When a child gets sick, or hurts themselves on the playground, who leaves their job to go attend to that child? Certainly not the father, it’s the mother who leaves work. Also, women are more nurturing and caring than men, so they are also the more likely of the sexes to take care of an ailing parent or relative (more so than their male siblings). And, of course, women take off for maternity leave.

And who picks up the slack at work when women leave to have babies, or nurture and care? Their male counterparts that’s who!

I'm not saying this is fair, but it’s the truth, and because of it, because of these facts, because of the dependability issue, the marketplace views women as being less valuable in the workplace, which translates to the lower wage.

If I do the same job as a women but I'm more dependable, and I'm picking up her slack when she's out (for whatever reason), then heck ya I should get paid more, the hell with political correctness.

reply

Thanks for providing reasons to my points. :)

_4. Women usually retreat in risky situations? Evidence please._

Google: Women 'won't ask for pay rise'
And you will see your evidences. They won't ask because they are more afraid of risk loosing the job.

_6. So you're saying that because a woman is "less likely to be risky/competitive" she should be paid less for the same job_

Sometimes calculated risk brings more money into company which means that person who makes risky decisions usually drinks more champaign. This also means that man can bring down company much faster than woman.

_WHY would a woman get paid less for the same job?_

Same "job title" doesn't mean same "job". If you have two "taxi drivers" in busy city, one is a former racer, other is casual driver then it is clear that racer would make more money per day by speeding (at expense of bigger crash risk).

_get lower pay because of your gender._

If women is not afraid to risk and able to produce results then she will be well paid. Business don't care about gender it cares about how much profit you can make.

reply

Having an ignorant opinion is one thing but making up things to prove an ignorant point is quite another. If you are in a 3rd world or extremely sexist country then what you just said is fine and ignore my message. But if you are in the US or UK you should know that there are a lot of women in the army. The Marines no. The Navy more than the marines but still a lot less than men. Air Force and army are much higher. The amount of women in the military a few years ago was higher than racial minorities. You're dillusional.

And as someone else pointed out if you don't know why women aren't risky in business you should really take a women's studies course.

reply

My husband makes $20/hr.

I'm sure Dear Abby would tell you that your problems are of your own creation, you should have never married a guy who only makes $20. per hour. Next time set your sights a little higher.

reply

You should make your husband share the workload. He probably doesn't know how to cook, but he would take on other tasks like getting the kids dressed for school, tossing clothes in the washer, picking the kids up after school, vacuuming the carpet, and so on.

If you don't follow my suggestion then you have no one to blame but yourself. If you want equality, then demand it. Demand the hubby do work at home too.


-----
Because God created it, the human body
can be uncovered and preserve His splendor. -Pope John Paul

reply

>>>"And men still get paid more than women do for doing the same work. "

Not true. Men and women have equal jobs and experience (years) get equal pay. This has been proved again and again, but the progressives don't want to hear it because it leaves them with nothing to complain about.


-----
Because God created it, the human body
can be uncovered and preserve His splendor. -Pope John Paul

reply

Huilenowl: you're an idiot.

I'd have more sympathy for (and agree with the majority of )your post if men and women as members of groups were truly treated equally as individuals on their own individual merits and not because of their genitalia. But that isn't happening. Women are still being discrimiinated against, both as individuals AND as a group. It's STILL A MAN'S WORLD. Males still get paid more money for the same or comparable work than females do - STILL. Males have had it their own way, all the educational and social opportunities - the "masculinization" of education, if you will - for the last ten thousand years, and now you complain that men being discriminated against because of merely forty years of change - change that you claim doesn't benefit you as an individual, or your group? Cry me a river, baby child. You have no idea what discrimination or lifelong oppression is. And now you're getting your first taste of it. Good, huh?

When it is just as economically profitable and socially prestigious for both exclusively male and exclusively female groups - THEN it will be "okay for boys to be with just boys sometimes, just as it is for girls".

So...it's okay for girls to score "not much lower" than boys in standardized tests, but it's not okay for boys to score twenty points lower? Gee, thanks - I thought you were saying that it's okay for females to score lower but it's oh so bad for males to score lower. Oh, that IS what you were saying? That when women do better than men, it's unusual, but when men do better than women - that's just normal? Hate to tell ya, but your Freudian slip is showing.

And whining about "misandry" is ridiculous. When males stop discriminating against/envying/hating women - in other words, when misogyny stops - "misandry" will stop. Stop doing things that make others hate you; stop holding others back in order to feel better about yourself, stop buying into the myths of male superiority you've always been taught that end up being another layer of *beep* for you to cut through - and they won't hate you. But that's too simple - and too kind - for you to comprehend. Your attitude is all rooted in your OWN sense of powerlessness.

That's what always makes me laugh at people - both male and female - like you. You and your "reverse sexism" charges, your constant quoting of Rush Lamebrain (as if he were God Almighty instead of a opportunistic drug addict), your "feminazi" sneers, your depiction of "feminists" as man-hating primates with horns and tails, your boring recitation of the "politically correct" litany as a so-called viable rationalization to say and write things that show you to be the pathetic juveniles you are - you KNOW that women are discriminated against and that it is WRONG TO DO SO, but you're NOT willing to do anything about it except complain that it's "sexist" against men for dedicated men AND women to even attempt to correct this inequity.

You're in total denial, and what passes for your brain is up your a$$.

The truth is rarely pure and never simple.--Oscar Wilde

reply

[deleted]

fiercedance wont stop until men have disapeared

reply

This movie was based on a girl who tried to get onto a boy's soccer team. It really happened, and at the school there really wasn't a girl's soccer team to join. Does that make this story anti-male? It was just the character's obstacle. She ended up winning a game for the team, so everyone was happy in the end-- boys and girls. I think that the main message of the movie wasn't girl vs. boy, but the idea that if you work hard at something it's possible. It's the same message with all sports movies.

reply

Sorry, dear, but it wasn't a true story - it did not "really happen" as they led folks to believe.

Elizabeth Shue, whom the story is based on, never played on a boys high school soccer team and never won the big game for them. She realized at age 12 that the boys continued to grow and were bigger, stronger and faster than she and so when she finally got to high school, she became a cheer leader.

Oh, and her soccer playing brother didn't die in a car crash in high school, he died when he was 27 years old in a tragic accident while on a family vacation.

reply

Bckelley your totally wrong

"The film was inspired by events in the lives of the Shue family. Elisabeth Shue played a role inspired by her mother, Andrew Shue produced the film and had a small role, younger brother John helped raise the finances, and it was directed by Davis Guggenheim, Elisabeth's husband.[2]

The film is set in 1978 and features a 1970s soundtrack including songs from Boston, Blondie, Aretha Franklin, and Bruce Springsteen.
"


Inspired by events in of shue family

Maybe not all of its true. But the bottom line your think its all made up

reply

do you not know the definition of the word "inspired"?

That means many of the movies "facts" were made up

reply

Go learn so more will you

reply

.......why don't you complain about movies that have black people overcome being black in white society.



reply

The story portrays a range of boys, most antagonistic but several supportive. In my experience this is how it really plays out.

My wife has been part of many "male" activities, has consistently done very well, and met with enormous resistance and anger.

An example, which neatly cuts through any argument that the treatment she gets is normal for males: she played the online FPS game "Tribes" which in 2002 was almost exclusively played by males. Her screen name did not indicate her gender. She was consistently ranked as one of the top 10 players in the world by the scorekeeping system. She never advertised her gender, but if it came up she would say she was a girl.

Aside from a small portion of guys who were cool about it, there were basically two reactions: attraction and aggression. The way they interacted with her _changed_. They would put extra effort into antagonizing her and get absolutely outraged when she was able to fend for herself. Or they would hit on her, make rude sexual comments, and sometimes actually fall in love. It was very strange. And since she knew how they acted before they knew she was female, there was no way to hide that it was sexist treatment.

Whatever the political issues and the results of gender affirmative action, you have to admit that women who don't fall into line get harassed. You also have to admit that men that don't fall into line get harassed. Most people are cruel to folks they determine are "different".

I'm not saying that we need to make policy to change that, but I think it's absurd to call out a movie like Gracie as being either unrealistic or flawed simply because it presents this issue. Sure, it's been done before, and sure, there's other sides to the story, but the fact is that these are real issues that young women face if they don't follow the social norms.

Cheers.

reply

>>You also have to admit that men that don't fall into line get harassed.<<



that's true. Men who don't fall into line are sometimes treated worse. They're called fags, queers, etc. and in most situations, they are bullied and even physically assualted for not fitting into a traditonal and accepted male role.

reply

Get over it boys!

I am a 60-something year old man with three daughters and a son. All have been involved in sports, some at a high level, and this film is talking about an attitude in the 70s. Bin there, saw that. I was a coach of a mixed soccer team in the 80s when that wasn't "cool". Even our own son was party to some of that attitude - until he played summer (ice)hockey with some awesome girls (we are from Canada, by the way) and got an education. Got his ass kicked until he realized he had to go with the flow and be a team mate. Made some good friends.

At the professional level, very few - very few - women can compete with men in contact sports. But at the highschool level - give them the chance.

It's not about beating down boys, for goodness sake. It's about letting people, no matter what their gender, being their best!

reply

I agree with the thread starter. I really hates the fact that the governments around the developped world made a bunch of policies to have girls succeed more than boys in school. It is sexism against men, or whatever it's called.

reply