MovieChat Forums > Before It Had a Name Discussion > I think this film is a dark romantic com...

I think this film is a dark romantic comedy


If I could just try to throw in something positive here, I just finished watching the film and reading the user comments, reviews etc, and my take on this film is that it is a bit of a dark romantic comedy. To give kudos to Giada Colagrande as an actress, I think she pulls of the moody, religious and indignant lover well, and combined with DeFoe's gaunt, mysterious, and galavanting character, the two lovers work well in a seductive and neurotic way that surprisingly exudes a lot of the tenderness, and vulnerability that would be felt if real people were experiencing something as confusing as falling in love in the middle of dealing with the sharp grief of death. As truths are revealed about Karl, Eleanora's former lover inside the setting of the strange house that he left her, the two characters transform into more meaningful and developed roles. Eleanora says this best when she screams at Leslie that he is the house's caretaker, and that he should "take care of her too." As a Catholic, I also identified strongly toward the end of the film when through Eleanora's dreams, she deals with insecure feelings of comparing herself to one of Karl's "B*tches or Whores" and addresses the jealousy she is beginning to feel for Leslie. In her dreams, she crosses herself several times. Giada's dark and exotic beauty and Defoe's gaunt and sinister character pull of the atmosphere of the film well. The ending-well, the way I saw it was that is when the title actually made sense. She is the "black widow" and goes looking for answers in the house of her deceased lover, only to find new love and end up experiencing his death as well. With and ending this abrupt, I thought that the film was a bit of a dark comedy.

reply

You must have some sort of financial attachment to this film to write such a positive review. This is about as positive of a spin as one could put on such a piece of work. And it is very misleading.

Dark Comedy? Perhaps when you begin laughing at yourself for investing time into watching this movie. The only reason to watch this movie is based on Dafoe and you will never do that again after this view.

If you read reviews on how awful this movie is and watch it anyway to see how bad it is, you are someone who says, "try this, it tastes really bad".

reply

Agreed. What about, "smell this, it stinks"?

reply

I don't have any financial attachment to the film, it was just my opinion which I am entitled to. I am sorry you didn't like it but I'd appreciate it if you could respect the fact that I have a different opinion than you do. Yes, I like Willem Dafoe, but I also liked Colagrande's character and what I detected in the film was based on my own genuine thoughts and feelings. So, the review I gave was meant to be genuine, again, sorry if you didn't like the film or the review, but that is my opinion. Thank you.

reply

It wasn't dark enough. When they turned the lights on and yelled "action", it got ruined.

Go ahead, make my day....

reply

I would like anyone who has seen this to tell me if there was a scene in the movie where Giada's character almost hits a little girl with her car and the little girl flips her off? Anyone can confirm?

reply

[deleted]

Yes, in the DVD version I saw (entitled "Black Widow") the soundtrack clearly has the girl saying, "Forget You, Lady!" but her lips are clearly saying "F@#k You Lady!" This must be further evidence of major censoring in the American release, as I never saw the raunchy sex scenes and off-label use of a tampon to which others here refer. I rooted for this film all the way, and don't object to the acting as much as others on this board; but apparently I didn't see a complete film, so it's hard to remder fair judgement. F@#k censorship!

reply

Yeah just watched this (unfortunately) and they definitely censored every curse word in the film (Dafoe swears 3 or 4 times). It doesn't matter though, as that wouldn't aid this film anyway.

reply

You guys think this movie is a piece pf crap, well you haven't seen crap until you've watched All In with Dominique Swain, I swear, THIS movie is the worse movie ever made.

As for my take on the movie, it was kinda hard to get. I thought it was because I was watching it at like 1 in the AM, I was trying to see if I watched it correctly but got nothing. The part of the movie when she was dreaming, I blanked! But I missed a bit of the beginning, did the beginning of the movie answer some questions?

Always an active duty Jr. American Gladiator!

reply

Sorry buddy. I just got your note. I shouldn't have been so sarcastic.

reply

Congrats on being one of the few people who give this movie more than a 1st glance. This film is done in the tradition of the European masters who put theme over plot, conveying meaning without hitting you over the head with explanations; it's all about mood. Very few American films have the guts to go in that direction, and they're almost always panned by American audiences. But if you liked this movie you should check out Jim Jarmusch & Vincent Gallo.

As you said, the characters develop very slowly. Their initial reticence makes it hard to figure them out, but we get clues as the movie progresses. Eleanora's insecurity vs. Dafoe's sinister presence was a great dynamic. I also saw the humour in it, especially in the restaurant scene ("deconstructed jambalaya" LOL) which is so deadpan that most people probably miss the joke. The waiter, Issach de Bankole, is utterly hilarious in his delivery (check him out in Jim Jarmusch films for more of the same).

reply