Because he was still a kid dnd already killing people. It was told about on the how. How many times did Nancy freak about the Shane thing and go off on a rant about how h was supposed to be kid doing kid things, not killing people. I agree with you-it's a good thing he killed her because she was about to have Shane and Silas killed n she would have doe it too, but at th same time, it isn't morally correct but to be fair this show isn't about the good guys/saints triumphing over the bad guys. And realistically, they couldn't run to the cops or get help from anyone in this situation so what was Nancy supposed to do to protect her kids.
The most important part was he was just a kid though. Nancy always had a problem wit Shane growing up too quickly, but I never held that against Shane. He is the result of lacking of parenting which is Nancy's fault. How many times did he have to rely on himself to raise himself. Sure he had Silas and Andy and while I love them, they were just as dependent on Nancy as Shane. But to answer your question-Nancy didn't like Shane still being a kid and not acting and doing what kids should be doing. He should be doing thins like playing soccer, hanging out wit friends doing normal teenage things and instead he's losing his virginity at 13 with 2 girls, hanging out with a druggie gang[even if it is just Andy and the others], selling drugs, and killing people. I can understand why a mother would get freaked out, even when he did do it to save him and his brother.
He also didn't feel any remorse about killing her. Didn't he even make a joke about it ['the deep end' joke] or was that someone else. He didn't even care that he just bashed a womans head in.
I'm a Timelord.
Right, not pompous at all then.
reply
share