I have a theory as to why there are no below the waist frontal shots.
Let's just say "historical accuracy." (hint)
Are you suggesting that central casting was unable to locate any young actresses willing to wear a fur bikini for the duration of this shoot?
shareThe reason is because Hollywood has been too afraid of the feminazis to show good full female nudity. They showed several films in 2008 with full frontal male nudity but almost no full female nudity. (usually just topless) Even when a woman is bottomless, they're usually careful to only show bush, no actual vagina. Its an unfair double-standard. If the entire male sexual organ can be shown (penis and testicles) then the entire female sex organs can be shown too (vulva and anus). Hollywood has been showing full male genitalia but not full female genitalia. Usually we only get to see the women topless (non-genital nudity) or, on rare occasions, bottonless but only showing bush, no actual genitalia.
This is going to change though. 90% of the numerous films of 2008 that showed male genital nudity underperformed, while full female nudity usually boosts tickets sales significantly. I expect we'll see full vagina (not just pubic hair, which is NOT genitalia, but the actual labia) soon enough. The market forces are demanding it; its Evolutionary Capitalism at its finest. Dick shots drive away audiences but pussy shots increase ticket sales. It the movie BUSINESS, after all. Look at Piranha; a mediocre movie but the wonderful female nudity (including flashes of vagina) drove up ticket sales significantly.
Virgin Territory wimped out and did poorly. If they are going to make a "sexy' movie with skin,then they had better show female skin! Audiences won't settle for just tit shots anymore. We want full vulva on display. This movie was a disaster. Idiots made it. It cost too much to make, targeted an audience wanting ribald fare, then missed its target audience completely by having too -tame nudity.
Uh Dude, you got a one track mind. How about getting a life?
shareNo, Tegas Teacher, you need to get a life. You're a loser. I don't comment about the lack of full female nudity from a pervy perspective (like you), I write about it from a political perspective. There are gender politics and the left-wing feminist agenda at work here. Full frontal female nudity was shown quite often during the 1980's, but we barely ever see it any more. Now we only get topless female "nudity", which hardly counts. Why has male genital nudity become far more prevalent, while full female nudity has become very rare in the last few years? There is a feminist political agenda at work here. This will change though due to more powerful economic forces, and full frontal female nudity, and even labia nudity, is coming. Ultimately, the economics of supply and demand and the forces of evolutionary capitalism will trump the left-wing political agenda.
But you're too dumb too understand such analysis. You think the lack of female frontal nudity was for 'historical accuracy"? Uh....I've got news for you pal, women used to shave and wax their vaginas going all the way back to ancient Rome, Greece, and Egypt. In fact, Roman noble men could not stand to have their wives with any hair down there and virtually ALL aristocratic women had bare vaginas. This trend continued even into the middle ages. It was only during the 1960's and 1970's that the "super-bush" became prevelant.
Knowing the sorry state of the US educational system, a dope like you is probably a history teacher!(even though you know nothing about ancient Roman, Greek, or Egyptian culture and history)
Uh no imbecile.
Every single post on your profile is about one subject. I picture you furiously masturbating while pretending you are stating something scholarly. Everything comes down to... (
Butthead voice) Heh Heh, there's not enough bush shots in movies. Heh heh, they show too many dicks! Heh heh, I'm tired of tits!" Heh heh!"
Sorry Loser, I have commented on other subjects besides nudity in film.
Now, go play with yourself some more.
The only reason you've commented on other things is because you're scatter-brained.
You jump around from topic to topic making meaningless comments about whatever pops into your pea-brain at the moment. You're unable to focus on one particular topic, and can't understand the political motivations of various underlying media trends.
Go back to playing with your Transformers. Douche.
I can assume your erect(but still incredibly tiny) penis was in your hand, while you typed that. Hope the payoff was worth it.
Transformers is something that you would probably watch. (Yeah, that Megan Fox is soooo hot. She probably wants me! Yeah, she wants me! Yeah, I could teach that Megan Fox what it means to be....)
Oh, By the way A** *beep* BA in History with an emphasis on Classics, Masters in secondary social studies, halfway through Masters in Ancient History!
Now, you still want to play "The meaning of pubic hair in ancient, medieval and pre-industrial societies" Little Boy?
[deleted]