Where do the judges draw the line?
As far as the collections are concerned, how do they justify their double standard decisions? They change their minds with EVERY challenge and with EVERY season.
Specifically: they have said in many seasons past how they chose this collection over that one because it was a fashion SHOW, not so much because the collection was better but because the designer put on a SHOW. Which is fine....if that's how you're going to judge each season, but you don't.
Seth Aaron won because he put on a SHOW; but because Mondos collection was (to quote Nina) "a cousin collection of Seth Aaron" they choose Gretchen. Gretchens collection was ready to wear; as was Anya's the following season.
They will rake a designer over the coals for making ready to wear; yet in certain circumstances they ignore that 'awful' term and grant a win to someone undeserving. So I'm confused why they would eliminate Laurence for making ready to wear even though they've awarded designers in the past for doing the same thing?
Naturally, we're going to assume it was the producers who made the final decision. Especially, when this is the 3rd year in a row we've watched the judges praise designers for their talents then 2 or 3 episodes before the finale the judges yawn and call them repetitive, which scares them into changing things up and therefore they lose all their strengths, giving an undeserving victory to a poor contestant. (Candice and Edmond. Kini and Amanda. Anyone?)
Every season has its theme. Sean Kelly's was the season of fringe. Last season was season super-size me. This season.....season of the banana.