Defending The 2002 Movie

I viewed the anime a long time ago and sadly never finished it. From what I've been reading on the boards it gets more engaging and I agree that telling Dumas' story from Albert's perspective is a great concept. At the time though I felt there were some yaoi elements and pretty much shun away from any anime that has such things. Nothing to do with my views on homosexuals, I accept it, the world is crappy enough without having someone to love no matter what gender they are. It's more about the kind of fangirls that go gag over two shirtless willowy figured men fawning over each other. It's just a strange concept to me. But back to the topic at hand.

Some have said they dislike the 2002 movie version because of neglected characters and other changes. I myself have only read the "Great Illustrations" version of the book, which is a rather abbreviated and rather child friendlier version, so the 2002 film was, is, more of my cup of coffee. I enjoyed the acting and the actors chosen. Guy Pierce plays his part well as the backstabbing, gold digging, and all around evil Englishman. James Caviezel is very good as Edmond, being very calculating and reveling in his revenge. As a film about getting revenge and being saved by love goes, it's pretty spot on. Sure some elements are a little displeasing, but doesn't cause too much of a negative impact overall.

Still people say they prefer the anime over the film. I can understand the appreciation for the art style and the change in perspective, but still why so much negativity? A demonic possession is acceptable but God forbid they exclude characters?