What Ebert writes


I like what Ebert researched here. Finding nothing on this very news worthy topic:

As a newspaperman, I wondered: How could a 30-something stockbroker live and work for several years in New York in both the financial and photography worlds, disappear, have his picture appear in the papers and on TV, and not be recognized by someone?

That led me to Nexis-Lexis, a database search engine that prowls the complete texts of newspapers. I wanted to read the original news stories about Doug Bruce’s discovery in Coney Island and the search for his identity.

I couldn’t find any. Searching both American and British papers for 2003, and then for the past five years, I found no news items at all about Doug or Douglas Bruce, amnesiac, with or without the keywords Coney Island. Nor any stories about Coney Island and amnesia in 2003 without Bruce’s name. Nothing at all. Separate searches of the New York Times and London Telegraph files also failed to turn up anything. All the stories on Google and Google News deal with the movie.

I think it was a grand hoax. Something like this would have been picked up by the news media. He would have friends in New York who would have been concerned about his disappearance and gone to the police. His pets were taken care of by someone. Hmmmmm.

reply

While I think this is an elaborate hoax, I don't agree with the argument that there is no news coverage of this. People end up in psych wards, arrested, freaked out on drugs, clubbed over the head, etc., all the time in New York, and they don't end up in the newspaper. The New York Times only has so much space for stories, and it is entirely conceivable that this guy's story happened and it didn't end up in any news stories. There are a hell of a lot of people in New York.

I do, however, think it is fake, for other reasons stated in other posts here.

"I've seen things that would make you want to write a book on how to puke."

reply

Ebert met the filmmakers and went on to write he was 'convinced of its truthfulness'
So...

reply

The only thing you need to know about Ebert is that he hated A Clockwork Orange and liked Dogma.

"I've seen things that would make you want to write a book on how to puke."

reply

Why is that a reply to me?

------------------------------------------
What you just read was probably a bit of a rant. Sorry

reply

Why not?

"I've seen things that would make you want to write a book on how to puke."

reply


I hated both 'A Clockwork Orange' and 'Dogma'. So what? I probably like movies you hated and vice versa.
Mind you, I think Ebert is a fool now, but your statement is absurd.
_ _ _

Happy September 11th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElWxk1pVwLE

reply

How could you possibly hate A Clockwork Orange? Overcoming your denial is the first step towards recovery.

reply