MovieChat Forums > Friends with Money (2006) Discussion > How come the biggest loser is the pretti...

How come the biggest loser is the prettiest?

posted 9 years ago by henrimaine
3 replies | jump to latest

I liked this movie. One small detail I noticed, though. The Jennifer Aniston character is the biggest loser of the four girls, but she is still the prettiest, or at least looks younger than the other three. I'm not saying the other three women were ugly, but they definitely looked older. But they were supposed to be the same age, weren't they.

Similar thing can be observed in the movie Sunshine Cleaning. In Sunshine Cleaning there is a scene were a woman (who is a cleaning lady) meets up with her school friends, and although she is supposedly the biggest loser of the bunch, she is also the prettiest.

I don't know what to make of this. Aren't poor people supposed to have a difficult life, and rich people have the opportunities to stay young and pretty?

[–] dannecurrell 9 years ago

Rich or poor does not determine looks. I thought Catherine Keener's character was the prettiest and the most unhappy. Loved the ending for Jen's character. Olivia was troubled and lost but she was getting there and knew how to take care of herself even if some of her methods were wrong and hurtful to herself and others. It was a movie about depressed people and i really loved it anyway.

[–] Melancholy11 8 years ago

How is she a loser? She was the least messed up out of all of them and owned her own stuff.

[–] darlene88 8 years ago

You're a moron.
Leave it to a dude to measure the success of a woman by her looks.
I'm a professional housecleaner, and offended by your ignorance.