Continuity ****SPOILERS


***SPOILERS


There are flaws in this flick that are difficult to overlook. In the first ten minutes of the movie, Danielle Camastra, who plays lead actress Lola, has a car accident and is severely cut on the bridge of her nose. She later goes to a family gathering, where the scar (a tiny one at that) on her nose magically disappears, then reappears, all in the space of a few minutes in 'real' film time.

Similarly, lead actor Kurt Becker is brutally beaten in this film. His face is a bloody mass of gashes. A short time passes. We then see his left cheek as differing shades of red, almost rash-like, as if he had merely scraped it on a wall. Amazing recovery for a guy who had endured a savage thrashing.

The continuity/editing, in short, is not good. I guess we're not supposed to notice such things in a theatre. Not so when you have a rewind button on a DVD player; it's there for all to see.

There's another nagging problem: sleazy Norman Benjamin (played by John Michael Higgins) is seen early in the film as a down-on-his-luck actor who can't get a job. Then we see him as the owner of a huge strip club. He dresses lavishly, is surrounded by thugs, and drives a big car. Not bad for a failed actor.

It was sad watching Maria Conchita Alonzo playing the mother. This once- pretty, pixie-like actress has had a ghastly round of cosmetic surgery that makes her look even older than her 52 years. I thought this stuff was supposed to make you look younger? She should sue her plastic surgeon.

All in all, this isn't a bad film, albeit too familiar by half. You've seen this plot before more than a few times.

reply

I thought exactly the same, about the scars and such,
I know that straight after an accident injuries normally
look so much worse with all the bloody around the wounds
and don't look half as bad when cleaned up but yes I
have to agree, they were a little too cleaned up.

Aside from that I thought the make-up teams did a great
job and it was only a visual discrepancy so it didn't
ruin the continuity flow of the film itself for me.

reply