MovieChat Forums > Good Night, and Good Luck. (2005) Discussion > 'Challenge' Accepted... Go to Politics B...

'Challenge' Accepted... Go to Politics Board...


OK Generic, let's "debate" on the Politics board since you've been thoroughly humiliated on this board:

http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000082/thread/172438795

Okay, Generic, take your best shot... and stop crying and whining...

I guess there is no way to really "debate" a person such as yourself.
But many have debated me, Generic. I've won some, lost some. But in your case, you've lied and misrepresented what I've wrote. So you're a proven ignorant troll who got caught lying.

LMAO

So come on, take another swing. You're batting .000 so far.

I challenge you to provide irrefutable evidence or data from a reliable source that supports your ludicrous comment that illegal aliens are crowding our ERs. Maybe in your area but not across the country. I see more uninsured Americans crowding our ERs.

Here's your response so far: ________.

Here's your irrefutable data so far: __________.

LMAO

The fact is there are more Americans without healthcare coverage and insured Americans with healthcare coverage that are crowding our ERs and seeking medical help.


I provided you with a NY Times report and data included in the report that addresses uninsured Americans crowding our ERs and needing healthcare coverage nationwide. Not just in Phoenix.

Your response was to write that I used the term "border states." I never addressed illegal aliens and border states.

LMAO

I never wrote about it being a "federal issue" and "states staying out of it." I challenged you to prove where I wrote those remarks.

Here's your response: ______________.

Yea, you lied.

And now you're thoroughly humiliated.

In addition, you can read in the JAMA a study entitled, Uninsured Adults Presenting to U.S. Emergency Departments: Assumptions vs. Data, that concluded that hospital ERs are overcrowded not because illegal aliens or uninsured patients have nowhere else to turn, but because insured Americans are choosing to visit them. So it's not your illegal aliens that are crowding all of our ERs. It's Americans---both uninsured and insured---especially people who carry government insurance policies because low reimbursement rates offered to doctors by government programs means very few will accept taxpayer-funded insurance any more, leaving those on government plans to visit ERs for care instead of primary-care physicians. The study also found that immigrants represent about 12% of the U.S. population, with noncitizens accounting for 21% of the nation's 46 million uninsured, which means that 79% of the uninsured are Americans.

Here's another JAMA study, Trends in Emergency Medicaid Expenditures for Recent and Undocumented Immigrants, which draws the same conclusions:

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/297/10/1085?maxtoshow=&H ITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=medicaid+illegal+imm igrants&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT

So now I suggest you provide some irrefutable evidence on this thread on this board that backs up your claim that illegal aliens are the cause of overcrowding in our ERs or remain a troll.

I provided irrefutable data backing up my conclusion.

You've provided this: ________.

LMAO

reply

You Mean Berk Sol WON'T Take my Challenge?
LMAO
Almost 24 hours since I posted the above post on the Politics board.
You've posted on the Politics board since that time, so you are aware of my accepting your challenge, Generic.
But you failed to show up and debate me even though you issued the challenge.
Generic, you are indeed a coward troll.

reply

Hey, good for you, Generic. You sucked it up and made it out of your cave ready to flaunt yet again your total ignorance of the reasons why our ERs are overcrowded. You may have read the NY Times article I posted, but you clearly didn't bother to read the 151-page report that the article highlights: The National Report Card on the State of Emergency Medicine.

The report concluded with this major reason, "Factors leading to an increase in emergency services... The emergency department has become a health care safety net for individuals who have insurance, but are unable to obtain appointments with primary care physicians or medical specialists in a timely manner. This includes individuals who have health care coverage through Medicaid or Medicare, but cannot find physicians willing to accept their coverage."

Your absurd claim also ignores many other reasons for overcrowding listed in this report, including: 1) having to treat and board psychiatric patients (no doubt you were one of them); 2) nonpsychiatric patients having to be boarded owing to a shrinking supply of nurses and beds; 3) the shortage of on-call specialists; 4) high liability insurance rates forcing physicians to curtail their practices; 5) unemployment; and 6) many others.

You also ignored a recent JAMA study, which resulted in the same conclusion: patients with health insurance were primarily responsible for the increase of emergency services over the past decade. Why? The payment doctors receive for Medicare and Medicaid patients is arbitrarily set at absurdly low levels by CMS, which depresses the payment physicians receive from commercial insurers. So primary care physicians don't accept new patients if they have Medicare, Medicaid or any insurance plan whose payment schedule is based on the CMS model.

I essentially wrote about and highlighted these reasons in my prior post but you chose to ignore that part, which destroys your absurd claim that illegal aliens are the cause of overcrowding in our emergency rooms.
You've claimed that the ER where you live is overcrowded with illegal aliens, therefore, all ERs are overcrowded with illegal aliens. This is beyond sheer stupidity, it's insane.

And, once again, Generic, you provided no irrefutable evidence to back up your idiotic conclusion.

Once again, you provided this: __________.


And in the other report on North Carolina that I provided, I'm glad you focused on this fact: immigrants represent about 12% of the US population, with noncitizens accounting for 21% of the nation's 46 million uninsured in 2004. That means that 79% of the nation's 46 million uninsured, or over 36 million, are American citizens.

And regarding your hilarious inaccurate 99% fixation...

99%. Let me repeat. 99%. That means ninety-nine for each one hundred. Why in North Carolina, a well known hotbed of illegal immigration, as many as ONE percent of uninsured patients crowding emergency rooms are legal citizens.
Wrong.

What a dumb clod you can be. Seriously, is English your primary language? How did you miss the objective of the report: "Objective: To describe Emergency Medicaid use by recent and undocumented immigrants including patient characteristics, diagnoses, and recent spending trends in North Carolina, a state with a rapidly increasing population of undocumented immigrants." This category, as defined in this report under the Objective, relates only to the use of Emergency Medicaid for coverage of emergency medical conditions "by recent and undocumented immigrants."

It does not include the use of Emergency Medicaid by uninsured Americans for ER visits in NC over the four-year period.


"99%... as many as ONE percent of uninsured patients crowding emergency rooms are legal citizens." Seriously, Generic, how dumb can you be?

Looking at the numbers, even a moron like you should be able to understand how the JAMA study concluded that patients with health insurance were primarily responsible for the increase of emergency services over the past decade. Oops, I almost forgot, I'm dealing with an idiot.
Woo-hoo!
Yup, an idiot.

reply

Well, for readers on the "Good Night, and Good Luck" board, here's how the great "debate" played out...

Generic, please don't make this any easier than it has already been. You're actually quite pathetic.

Gosh, you're right. I didn't "bother" to read your 151-page report.
Of course you didn't read it. You're a confused, ignorant troll who has been caught lying and misrepresenting what I've written. Why would anyone think that you would actually read irrefutable facts and evidence that totally destroys your insane commentary that illegal aliens are the cause of ER overcrowding.

And now you've again misrepresented and confused the facts regarding the two reports that I've provided.

LMAO

Now I know English is not your first language. Let's review what you just wrote...
I assumed you posted the NYT article because you agreed with it, but I take it you are backpedaling. Clearly you must not have read even that since you did not realize that it said that 99% of people crowding NC emergency roooms are illegal aliens.
You dunce.

Nowhere in the NY Times report does it mention that 99% of people crowding NC emergency roooms are illegal aliens.

I challenge you to show me where it says that in the NY Times report.

Every challenge I've made has been answered by you with this: _______.

LMAO

The NY Times report focuses on the unemployed and uninsured. It never mentions the words "illegal aliens" or "North Carolina."

Let's review the entire NY Times article:
Matthew Staver for The New York Times

As increasing numbers of the unemployed and uninsured turn to the nation’s emergency rooms as a medical last resort, doctors warn that the centers — many already overburdened — could have even more trouble handling the heart attacks, broken bones and other traumas that define their core mission. Dr. Melissa Hippely, a resident at Denver Health, examined Matthew Armijo last week. Mr. Armijo, who was laid off in August, arrived at the urgent care center with abdominal pain. Even before the recession became evident, many emergency rooms around the country were already overcrowded, with dangerously long waits for some patients and the frequent need to redirect ambulances to other hospitals. “We have no capacity now,” said Dr. Angela F. Gardner, the president-elect of the American College of Emergency Physicians, which represents 27,000 emergency doctors. “There’s no way we have room for any more people to come to the table.”

In a report to be released Tuesday, her group warns that the nation’s system of emergency rooms is in “serious condition.” Dr. Gardner argues that any public discussion of overhauling the current health system must include the nation’s emergency departments. The number of patients coming to emergency departments has been steadily increasing. Helping push up that volume have been the growing ranks of the uninsured, because emergency rooms are legally obliged to see all patients who enter their doors, regardless of their ability to pay. But even insured patients who have no quick access to regular doctors are also showing up — among them older people, who represent the fastest growing population of emergency room visitors.

So far, there are no firm figures on the recent influx. But even two years ago, when a government survey found that the annual volume of visits to emergency departments had reached 120 million — a third higher than a decade earlier — doctors considered many emergency rooms overburdened. Now the recession, whose full impact is yet to be seen, threatens to make conditions even worse, emergency doctors say. Hospitals are absorbing increasing amounts in unpaid medical bills, and some are already experiencing much higher numbers of patients without insurance.

For example, Denver Health, a public hospital system, had a 19 percent increase in emergency visits by uninsured patients in November — to 3,325, up from 2,792 a year earlier. “Virtually every time I work a nine-hour shift, I encounter a couple of patients who have never been here before because they’ve just lost their insurance,” said Dr. Vincent J. Markovchick, the director of the hospital’s emergency medical services. They include patients like Matthew Armijo, 29, who was laid off from his client services job at a technology company in August and could continue his health insurance only through October. He showed up at Denver Health’s urgent care center, a part of the emergency department, suffering from increasing abdominal pain. Mr. Armijo said he went there because he would not have to pay anything. Denver Health expects the amount of care it delivers for which it will never be paid to grow to more than $300 million this year, compared with $276 million in 2007. Some patients are people who have delayed seeking medical care as long as they can, like those who arrive during an asthma attack after deferring treatment.

“I am definitely seeing patients coming in presenting worse in their illness because they are further along,” said Dr. Katherine A. Bakes, the director of the program’s emergency services for children. Other doctors around the country also report treating people who seem to have no other option. One emergency room doctor in Iowa, Dr. Thomas E. Benzoni, said he recently saw a mother come in with her two children for what he thought was routine care. When he asked her why she had not gone to her family doctor, she said she did not have health insurance. “I don’t know what else she was supposed to do,” Dr. Benzoni said.

The increase is not affecting all emergency rooms. Some emergency physicians, in fact, said there had actually been a recent decline in visits. A report by the American Hospital Association for July, August and September found a slight overall decrease in hospital traffic, including emergency visits, as some people apparently sought to avoid spending money on anything they did not deem absolutely essential. But as the recession continues, many officials of the college of emergency doctors predict it is only a matter of time until the rising number of uninsured and the delays in getting primary care create a crisis. “I think we’re seeing the tip,” said Dr. Nicholas J. Jouriles, the group’s current president. Patients, he said, will have no choice but to come to the emergency department when they have no money or insurance. “They will get turned away elsewhere,” he said.

One of the doctors’ major concerns is the long waits by patients requiring a hospital bed. The doctors group, surveying its members last year, learned of at least 200 deaths related to the practice of “boarding” — in which patients on stretchers line the corridors until they can be moved into a bed. “Crowding is a national public health problem,” said Dr. Jesse M. Pines, an emergency physician in Philadelphia. Patients forced to wait for hours on end for a bed clearly suffer. “It was pure hell,” recalled Robert Roth, whose 90-year-old mother, Kato, last year spent 36 hours at the emergency department of a Queens hospital, near her home in Jackson Heights, waiting for a room after going to the emergency room in the middle of the night. Mrs. Roth, who had a recent series of falls, said she had been hearing music in her ears, and both her son and the doctor he called were worried about a possible stroke. After the first five hours of waiting, she became increasingly disoriented and delusional. Mr. Roth was unable to stay with her during the entire wait. After he left and returned, he said, the hospital staff told him they had no idea where she was. She turned up in an empty room off the emergency department, and her physical and mental condition had clearly deteriorated, Mr. Roth said. She believed that she had been kidnapped. When she had to go several weeks later to another emergency department in Manhattan, she endured a 20-hour wait for a room, again becoming disoriented after several hours, forcing her to be sedated.

The emergency staffs “just seemed overwhelmed, overwhelmed,” said Mr. Roth, who wondered why emergency departments could not handle the elderly in a special fashion. Dr. Ann S. O’Malley is a physician and senior researcher for the Center for Studying Health System Change, a nonprofit group in Washington that has studied emergency services in different communities. While some hospitals have taken steps to reduce crowding and move patients more efficiently from the emergency department into rooms, Dr. O’Malley said, others have responded by expanding their facilities — attracting more patients. “Emergency departments,” she said, “are a kind of barometer of the general health of the rest of the system.” Dr. Eric J. Lavonas, an emergency physician in Denver, said: “The nation’s emergency rooms are the end of the line. We will strain and stretch and bulge under the weight.” Dr. Gardner, of the emergency doctors’ group, said the question now is whether the emergency room safety net will break — how often people with heart attacks will not be able to get care in time to be saved. Her group’s report, she said, is meant to alert people to the precarious nature of the system. “What they don’t understand,” she said, “is that the system is fundamentally flawed and will fail.”
Go ahead, dunce, and find where it says, "that 99% of people crowding NC emergency roooms are illegal aliens" in the NY Times report. What kind of retard are you, anyway.

LMAO

And in the JAMA report entitled,
Trends in Emergency Medicaid Expenditures for Recent and Undocumented Immigrants, that I provided, once again you've clearly misrepresented the facts and truth and/or you're just too stupid to understand the terms and sampling of the study as put forth in the objective.

First, let's reread the title of the report, dunce:
Trends in Emergency Medicaid Expenditures for Recent and Undocumented Immigrants. Anything jump out at you, moron? No mention of uninsured or insured Americans. Now let's reprint the Objective: "Objective: To describe Emergency Medicaid use by recent and undocumented immigrants including patient characteristics, diagnoses, and recent spending trends in North Carolina, a state with a rapidly increasing population of undocumented immigrants." See any mention of uninsured Americans? Hablo ingles? The category group, as defined in this report under the Objective, relates only to the use of Emergency Medicaid for coverage of emergency medical conditions "by recent and undocumented immigrants."

It does not include the use of Emergency Medicaid by uninsured Americans for ER visits in NC over the four-year period.

Claiming otherwise only proves to everyone reading this that you are indeed an ignorant, lying troll.

And now, "Results: A total of 48,391 individuals received services reimbursed under Emergency Medicaid during the 4-year period
of this study."

And the study was focused soley on the use of Emergency Medicaid for coverage of emergency medical conditions "by recent and undocumented immigrants." Still wanna kick a dead tire, moron?

LMAO


And now this gem that proves you must be seriously retarded...
Nothing in that paragraph disputes the NYT's fact posted by you that 99% of the people crowding emergency rooms are illegal aliens.
LMAO

Once again, moron, the NY Times article does not mention any of that verbiage. What exactly are you smoking or ingesting that clearly prevents any rational thought from entering your retarded mind?


And you've completely ignored the recent JAMA study, which concluded that patients with health insurance were primarily responsible for the increase of emergency services over the past decade. The payment doctors receive for Medicare and Medicaid patients is arbitrarily set at absurdly low levels by CMS, which depresses the payment physicians receive from commercial insurers. So primary care physicians don't accept new patients if they have Medicare, Medicaid or any insurance plan whose payment schedule is based on the CMS model.

I essentially wrote about and highlighted these reasons in prior posts but you chose to ignore that part, which destroys your absurd claim that illegal aliens are the cause of overcrowding in our emergency rooms. You've claimed that the ER where you live is overcrowded with illegal aliens, therefore, all ERs are overcrowded with illegal aliens. This is beyond sheer stupidity, it's insane.

And, once again, Generic, you provided no irrefutable evidence to back up your idiotic conclusion.

Once again, you provided this: __________.
Since I have a real life, I did not take the time to read the rest of your absurd rant.
Written like a true troll that you've been proven repeatedly to be. Of course you don't read anything, you just keep repeating your delusional conclusions without providing any irrefutable evidence.

LMAO

Sorry for the continued humiliation, Generic. But you do put a smile on my face.

reply

Still kicking a dead tire, Generic Retard?

Results: A total of 48 391 individuals received services reimbursed under Emergency Medicaid during the 4-year period of this study. The patient population was 99% undocumented, 93% Hispanic, 95% female, and 89% in the 18- to 40-year age group.
"The patient population was 99% undocumented" refers to fact that in a scientific and/or statistical study (such as this study), there is a strong statistical probability for one or more persons in the study group to be counted outside the subject group as presented in the objective of the study. A case could have been that one or more patients were in the process of becoming an American citizen or became a citizen during the course of this four-year period. Thus statistically, the control group could not be 100%, but 99%. I don't expect you to be educated in statistics, but even a ten-year-old could grasp the meaning of this simple case study.

Apparently, you didn't read or still can't grasp the clear meaning of the Objective and Title of the Study. I'll refresh your retarded brain.

The title of the report is: Trends in Emergency Medicaid Expenditures for Recent and Undocumented Immigrants.

That, dear retard, excludes any U.S. citizens from participating at the onset of this study.

The Objective as clearly defined in the study: To describe Emergency Medicaid use by recent and undocumented immigrants including patient characteristics, diagnoses, and recent spending trends in North Carolina, a state with a rapidly increasing population of undocumented immigrants.

Again, dear retard, this excludes any U.S. citizens from participating at the onset of this study.

The study was focused soley on the use of Emergency Medicaid for coverage of emergency medical conditions "by recent and undocumented immigrants."

I'm sorry that your retarded, challenged and pathetic brain is having great difficulty understanding the rather simplistic title and objective of the study.

reply

This was how ollie's sock, "Generic," lost this "debate."
It was even close.

reply