MovieChat Forums > The Cutter (2006) Discussion > Norris fanboys keep this dinosaur going

Norris fanboys keep this dinosaur going


He is way past his due date in his chosen genre of action, especially martial
arts action.

Van Damme has a little dignity for his audience, he rarely fights in his movies, well kicks like he did, that's age folks. He is atleast aware of this.

Stupid Norris, blinded by his own superego, thinks his limited audience wants
to see a 67 year old doing chop socky on people half his age, who could easily
bash the old man with a flick to his groin.

By the look of his filmography, someone close and dear to him has 'bravely'
said retire, or youre becoming the TOm jones of your genre.


Loser.

reply

Despite his age, he still seems to be in great shape, and The Cutter was better than say any Seagal film in years.

"Stupid Norris, blinded by his own superego, thinks his limited audience wants
to see a 67 year old doing chop socky on people half his age"

Yes, we do want to see just that.

"who could easily bash the old man with a flick to his groin."

It's just a movie, enjoy it or don't.

"Loser."

Hey, he's not even making movies actively anymore, he has other things to do, he does what he wants, and that's great, that hardly makes him a loser.

reply

And he was actually "only" 64 when he did the movie and it was a lot better than some "newer" direct to DVD movies with younge actors I`ve seen recently...

reply

Yea sp shut the hell up. Chuck rules and your just a fool. Him and Bruce Lee are great. Van Damme? Seagal? Those two are just the worst.

reply

I like Seagal and Van Damme, but The Cutter was a fine direct to dvd action movie. Considering it was Norris Retirement movie(before being back in the expendables as a guest star) i say he did pretty fine. Daniel Bernhardt may not be an A-list actor, but he deserve his credit in the martial art gender and in 2005 was still not that old for a main vilain.

Norris did a fine job and the movie was entertaining. Sure it was direct to dvd stuff but as some said it was better than some Seagals, some Van Dammes and other DTV.

When it comes to Seagal and Van Damme, its either hit or miss, Seagal always goes on a kinda weird path... he produce his own movies, always make himself the star of them, and sometims i think it work fine and i enjoy the movie( Dangerous Man for exemple) and other times it dosen't. Last one i saw was Maximum Conviction wich is i think his last one, and it was nice, not SUPER GOOD, but definately nice, but Steve Austin put out most of the show.

Van Damme... he had a deep period, where most of his stuff was not that good, but in the latest years, seem like what he did was not that bad actually, quite entertaining. Maybe not Bloodsport/Lionheart quality, but still fun. Universal Soldier Regeneration was very fun, Assassination games a pretty good story with nice antion, 6 Bullets was a very nice little DTV movie overall. He was awesome in Expendables 2 as the vilain. Dragon Eyes was pretty much terrible but i blame the writers... as Mr Van Damme scene where very fine, and Cung Le fought well in it, the story was crap. Universal Soldier Day of Reckoning was sadly disapointing, but i also blame the writers, as i hated the story... Adkins acting was fine, his action scene(too few of them) where pretty good, and Van Damme was more or less just a guest star.

In any case i think Van Damme futur is ok, as long as we don't expect to see him again put out another bloodsport. He can still make decent DTV movies.

My biggest wish is to see a new generation bloodsport, not a remake per say, as it would need to fit this generation(wich is more MMA oriented) but Van Damme could be the professor, the old teacher showing the way and preparing a new champion of the kumite, still keeping the story of the first Bloodsport intact.

Alice is the worst character of all time, she need to die in the last movie. Chris/Jill are RE !!!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]