MovieChat Forums > Lassie (2006) Discussion > What will America think of this movie?

What will America think of this movie?


Do many Americans out there understand that this movie is based upon the original book by Eric Knight, written in 1938? From the people I have spoke to (around five), no one had a clue that the story of lassie originated in England. The hollywood version did take off and changed the minds of it generation. But in what way! this story is completely different from the one portrayed by hollywood. I wonder how it will be rated across the pond.

reply

Movie critic Michael Wilmington gave it 3 1/2 stars and a glowing review in today's Chicago Tribune. He made a point of noting that it closely follows the book. I definitely want to see it based on the excellent review.

reply

Thanks for mentioning that review! So far I haven't read of any comparisons with the original book nor the 1943 movie. This movie does have a lot more in it than the earlier filmed version and I was wondering which was more accurate. This current release is the better one by far and does seem to include some original touches as well, i.e. the "Loch Ness scene".

reply

[deleted]

Unfortunately I think most Americans will not be able to understand the Yorkshire accents for a start. Especially the young boys! Maybe they will do a dub for US audiences, at least for the DVD. Don't think it is possible? Remember they dubbed Mel Gibson's aussie accent in MAD MAX all those years ago!!

reply

Dubbing--yuck. I don't mind subtitles, if I can't comprehend the voices, but I hate dubbing--would much rather hear the original, however hard to understand, and read along when I need to.

reply

Okay, I'm about as American as you get, went and saw it with my mom and little siblings. Those accents were so annoying!!!! On some people it was classy, but that little boy, I just wanted him to shut up. Just the saying of "Lassie" seemed so wrong. I had no idea lassie originated in England, it's such a huge part of American culture. It was heartwarming, but a lot of it was like "What the heck?" Even the opening scene was weird, guys peeing? Is that normal? Are parents that evil? People who beat up little people to get midget gold? The dog was beaten to death? It's biggest flaw and asset was the foreign time and place. It was charming, but in some ways kind of boring. Not that funny, very, very, very depressing, but it made you feel more emotions than most kids movies nowadays. At least the ending was happy, but my little siblings hated all of it except for the happy ending.

reply

In reply to actionromancefan:- I'm sure that most Americans will have no problems with the accents, just as most British, Irish, Australian, New Zealanders etc have no problem with American accents. You found that the accents were so annoying, especially the little boy’s. Not sure what you found so annoying, but children tend to have stronger accents than adults. As we grow older we tend to mix with more people from outside our own region, so we are understood more clearly our accents get softer. But have you ever thought that there maybe people from outside your own region who may find your accent annoying, but most people will be too polite to say so.

You say that Lassie is such a huge part of American culture. That may be the case but Hollywood has ‘borrowed’ so many stories that have their origins in the British Isles. Everything from Sherlock Holmes to Agatha Christie mysteries, from Shakespeare plays to Dickens novels, from works by Robert Louis Stevenson to works by Daniel Defoe, from the works of P. G. Wodehouse to the works of Oscar Wilde, from Jane Austen books to books by the Brontes, from Dracula to Frankenstein, from Robin Hood to Ivanhoe, from King Arthur to Queen Boadicea, from Wind in the Willows to Winnie-the-Pooh. Modern American films that are based on British stories include The Italian Job, Alfie, Fever Pitch, The Ladykillers, Get Carter, Lord of the Flies, The Wicker Man and The Jackal. American television companies buy up the rights to copy any half decent British sitcom. To my knowledge, over 60 British sitcoms have been Americanized, some more than once. Classic American sitcoms such as All in the Family, Three’s Company and Sanford & Son are all American versions of classic British sitcoms. Other American comedies such as Whose Line is it Anyway? and That Was The Week That Was are also American versions of British comedies. There used to be a time when the British use to copy American game and quiz shows, now the trend seems to be reversed. Fairly recent American game, quiz and talent shows such as American Idol, Dancing with the Stars, Who Wants to be a Millionaire? and The Weakest Link are all based on British formats. American television companies have also Americanized dramas, comedy-dramas, entertainment shows, reality shows, documentaries, children’s programmes etc from Britain. In fact, hundreds of Hollywood films and programmes have been ‘borrowed’ from not just the British Isles, but from many other countries too. Now I’m not saying that this is a good or bad thing, but remember that things that are part of modern American popular culture, could well be part of someone else’s culture also. All countries tend to ‘borrow’ ideas from other countries, but as Hollywood churns out hundreds of films and programmes a year, they seem to ‘borrow’ more than others.

reply

Also, "Life on Mars," another amazing show that never got the opportunity to find an American audience. Damn Yanks!

reply

THIS American loved it. I thought the accents were not unintelligible at all. I had no trouble understanding anyone. I've read several glowing reviews and one not so good one (from our rinky dink local paper, so who cares what HE thinks...I've decided he's an idiot, anyway). I think they need better publicity. We went on a Sunday afternoon one week after its release, and there were 8 people (our family of 4 and another family).

reply

It got generally positive reviews in the four local newspapers of Seattle and the accents sounded fine.

reply

agreed. I was shocked when I saw this only getting 6.8. The truth is, I really don't see many movies with dog stars getting good scores, from Benji to Lassie. Anyway, yeah this was one of my favorite moviews of the year. The kid actor was really good. Peter O' Toole played his part well, though not brilliantly, and the dog himself gives the movie four stars. I especially enjoyed the scenes with him and the dwarf. Oh and the accents were fine. Besides the kid and his family they weren't even that heavy.

reply

[deleted]

I, for one, LOVED it. I didn't have any problem with understanding the accents, on the contrary, I loved them. But then again I've never had problems like that with any movie.
I have a feeling that the older generation, who watched the American tv show and movies (but not the original movie) will not like it, but i think the younger generation will love it for what it is, because they won't have any comparison to make.

reply

I am American and I read the book by Eric Knight years before i saw any of the movies. I am looking forward to seeing a version faithful to the book.

reply

I read the plot summary for the original 1943 Lassie film "Lassie Come Home" on the Turner Classic Movies Database at the TCM website (http://www.tcm.com). The plot of the 1943 film is remarkably similar to this new "Lassie", and it is also set in England, so they have actually changed very little from the very first film.

This new "Lassie" does NOT follow the plot of any of the many "Lassie" sequels that followed, or the TV show. But it does have almost exactly the same plot as the 1943 film.

reply

Hollywood makes a lot of movies that originated from other countries. They also do a lot of remakes. Endless asian movie remake. What i hate the most is Quinton Terra Tino. He just puts subs on Asian movies and says the movies directed by him...

reply

[deleted]