Life of an American Fireman


Early on in this documentary clips are shown from Edwin Porter's Life of an American Fireman while Martin Scorsese generally goes on like he does about how the great intercutting of the different actions was the first great use of editing. The viewer is left to imagine how amazing this narratvie editing would have been to the audience in 1903. Great story.

Except none of it is true.

The Life of an American Firefighter is one fo the great hoaxes of cinema history.

Porter DID make Life of an American Firefighter in 1903, but at the time he hadn't really grasped the concept editing. So if you ever manage to see the original version, you'll see the entire story told from inside the house, then the film cuts to outside the house and you get to see the entire story again form the firefighters point of view. None of that fancy parallel editing that Scorsese was raving about.

Years later, Porter recut the film to the way most people have seen it, then cleverly presented it as the original cut, instantly (and retroactively) making him the first director to ever use linear narrative editing.

This documentary came out in 2004. This information isn't exactly new, I learned about it in film class years ago and it was hardly new information then. For a documentary about the history of editing, it didn't do a very good job.

reply

So what filmmakers used parallel editing prior to Porter's recut?

reply

Porter actually took the idea of "Life of An American Fireman" from James Williamson's film "Fire!".
Georges Melies was also using parallel editing at a similar time to Porter.

reply

Really? I go to film school and both the teacher and the textbooks say the same thing Scorcese said: that Porter pioneered parallel editing. So really you can't fault either Scorcese or the documentary that much, since this misinformation (I'm shocked to discover that it is indeed misinformation) is pretty much gospel even among the more learned film scholars.

Thanks for posting. It's very interesting.

Oh, no, I'm not tired. But my finger is!

reply

I thought there was something fishy here. In my Film History class the teacher showed us the original version. He said that Porter didn't figure out that you could cross cut, which is why he showed it from the inside, then the outside, out of sequence. Then we watched Great Train Robbery, where he did learn to crosscut.

reply

My professor explained it the same way :)

reply