i know anybody could write something better than this anybody but the people who wrote it
shareIt was a big disappointment. I was expecting a lot more based on the cast.
The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.~~ Einstein
I actually read something that described this as Woody Allen-esque...which is a stupid way to describe anything, much less a movie that is NOTHING like Woody Allen, except for the fact it's about several couples and takes place in New York. What a crappy movie. I can't imagine what would make anyone think this was clever or witty or well-written at all. It was totally made up of dozens of pieces of other lousy movies and shows. The only thing that made it watchable is the great cast.
http://moviesonthemind.blogspot.com/
Yeah, but the watchable cast wears thin quickly. In fact, it annoyed me even more that cast couldn't make it work.
Alot of the stuff looked like they could've ad libbed it anyway.
There were only a few good scenes---- David Duchovny showed up at the sex addict meeting and the one where Maggie G. told that guy to stop going down on her.
The characters were so flat, that I didn't give a s- about any of them.
The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.~~ Einstein
[deleted]
I thought it was a really good movie, I loved the cast and the story was interesting.
shareHey, me too. I liked it a lot
I only watched the movie for the cast. It had some moments but the ending was absolutely over the top and unbelievable (the sequence in the theater). For a moment I thought I was watching Pretty Woman again.
Dude means nice guy. Dude means a regular sort of person.
I liked it, but the last 20 minutes were lame.
I was a little disappointed too.
and i don't feel if you don't